RMIT Vietnam and Vietnam’s Development: Risk and Responsibility

Abstract

To help bridge the gap between demand and supply for tertiary education, Vietnam has opened to direct, foreign providers, and the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) International University Vietnam is the first of this category. By sponsoring a large project in a country that some see as risky, RMIT Vietnam needs to be triply viable. Financially, it relies on fees, so its programs must be effective and affordable. Environmentally, with its second campus in an estuarine environment near the centre of Ho Chi Minh City, it must demonstrate sustainable development and show new ways to develop learning and research environments. Socially and culturally, it must provide opportunities for the disadvantaged and engage with local communities. RMIT Vietnam is engaging directly in community partnerships and local projects, providing scholarships for disadvantaged students, and assisting with capacity building for local universities. In an emerging economy, such a market-reliant university can contribute to poverty alleviation and sustainable development.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asian Development Bank. (1994). Handbook for incorporation of social dimensions in projects. Manila, Philippines: Author.

Asian Development Bank. (1998a). Handbook on resettlement: A guide to good practice. Manila, Philippines: Author.

Asian Development Bank. (1998b). The bank’s policy of gender and development. Manila, Philippines: Author.

Asian Development Bank. (1999). Fighting poverty in Asia and the Pacific: The poverty reduction strategy. Manila, Philippines: Author.

Association of University Leaders for a Sustainable Future. (2002). Talloires Declaration resource kit: A guide to promoting and signing the Talloires Declaration. Washington, DC: Author.

Blöndal, S., Field, S., & Girouard, N. (2002). Investment in human capital through upper-secondary and tertiary education. OECD Economic Studies, 34, 41-90.

Bruntland, G. (Ed.). (1987). World Commission on Environment and Development: Our common future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Cernea, M. M. (Ed.). (1998). The economics of involuntary resettlement: Questions and challenges. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Cohen, M. (2003). Overseas bounty. Far Eastern Economic Review, 166(2), 48.

10.

Cowen, M., & Shenton, R. (1996). Doctrines of development. London & New York: Routledge.

11.

Dao, N. V. (1996). Higher education: A pivotal lever for socio-economic development in developing countries in the 21st century. In N. V. Dao & N. Xuan (Eds.), Conference proceedings higher education in the 21st century: Mission and challenge in developing countries (pp. 1-24). Hanoi, Vietnam: RMIT & Vietnam National University Hanoi.

12.

Government of Vietnam. (2000, March 6). Decree no. 06/ND-CP, 6 March/2000 of the government on investment co-operation with foreign entities in the fields of medical examination and treatment of diseases, education and training, and scientific research. Retrieved December 1, 2003, from http://www.dpi.hochiminhcity.gov.vn/invest/html/law3%20cu.htm#DEC-06

13.

Gutteridge, Haskins, & Davey Pty. Ltd. (2001, April). RMIT International University Vietnam resettlement action plan. Melbourne, Australia: World Bank & Asian Development Bank. Available at http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/IFCExt/spiwebsite1.nsf/2bc34f011b50ff6e85256a550073ff1c/7ac884c364db9c4b85256a2a00734c65?OpenDocument

14.

Hac, P. M. (1995). The educational system of Vietnam. In D. Sloper & L. T. Can (Eds.), Higher education in Vietnam: Change and response (pp. 41-61). Singapore: Institute for Southeast Asian Studies.

15.

Islam, R. (2002). Institutions to support markets. Finance and Development, 39(1), 48-51.

16.

Kelly, K. (2000, May). Higher education in Vietnam: Prospects for U.S. universities. Hanoi, Vietnam: Institute of International Education.

17.

Moock, P. R., Patrinos, H. A., & Venkataraman, M. (1998, January). Education and earnings in a transition economy: The case of Vietnam. Washington, DC: World Bank Vietnam Education Financing Sector Study.

18.

Official Development Assistance Partnership for Ho Chi Minh City. (2000). Resettlement in Ho Chi Minh City: Workshop report. Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: ODAP Support Office.

19.

Robinson, M., & Stueart, R. D. (Eds.). (2001). Systems and standards for libraries in Vietnam: Proceedings and outcomes of a workshop. Melbourne, Australia: RMIT International University Vietnam.

20.

Thu, N. X. (Ed.). (1994). Education in Vietnam: An overview. In Vietnamese studies in a multicultural world (pp. 230-252). Melbourne, Australia: Vietnamese Language and Culture Publications.

21.

Wolf, A. (2002). Does education matter? Myths about education and economic growth. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.

22.

World Bank. (1996). Vietnam education financing sector study: A sector report. Washington, DC: Author.

23.

World Bank. (2001). Vietnam 2010: Entering the 21st century—Partnerships for development. Hanoi, Vietnam: Author. Available at http://www.worldbank.org.vn

24.

World Bank. (2002). Constructing knowledge societies: New challenges for tertiary education. Washington, DC: Author.

25.

World Bank World Development Report. (2002). Building institutions for markets. Washington, DC: World Bank.

26.

Ziguras, C. (2001). Educational technology in transnational higher education in South East Asia: The cultural politics of flexible learning. Educational Technology and Society, 4(4), 8-18.