This study sought to better understand faculty members’ views of graduate international students through interviews with individuals from four academic departments at a top midwestern research university. Faculty members varied in the extent to which they perceived that international and domestic students had distinct academic and personal needs. They most commonly observed the following challenges that international students faced: functioning in English, achieving unique academic goals, adjusting culturally, and integrating with American students. Faculty members mentioned a variety of benefits that international students brought to their departments, including filling research assistant vacancies, helping them establish international ties, and providing American students with a more accurate perception of their life circumstances. Challenges that faculty members faced because international students were enrolled ranged from integrating domestic and international students to managing some faculty members’preferences for having American students in their research group.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agarwal, V. B., & Winkler, D. R. (1985). Migration of foreign students to the United States. Journal of Higher Education, 56(5), 509-522.
2.
Althen, G. (1990). Orientation of foreign students. Working Paper #13. Washington, DC: National Association of Foreign Student Affairs. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 330 297)
3.
Arthur, N. (1997). Counseling issues with international students. Canadian Journal of Counseling, 31, 259-274.
4.
Bailey, K. M. (1984). The “foreign TA problem.” In K. Bailey, F. Pialorsi, & J. Zukowski-Faust (Eds.), Foreign teaching assistants in U.S. universities (pp. 3-15). Washington DC: National Association for Foreign Student Affairs.
5.
Barber, E. G., & Morgan, R. P. (1984). Engineering education and the international student: Policy issues. Engineering Education, 74, 655-659.
6.
Barber, E. G., & Morgan, R. P. (1988). Boon or bane: Foreign graduate students in U.S. engineering programs (IIE Research Report Series No. 15). New York: Institute of International Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 295 542)
7.
Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 195-203.
8.
Bontrager, T., Birch, W. G., & Kracht, J. B. (1990). International students’concerns: Directions of supportive programming. College Student Affairs Journal, 10(2), 22-28.
9.
Chaffee, E. (1985). Three models of strategy. Academy of Management Review, 10, 89-98.
10.
Chen, C. P. (1999). Common stressors among international college students: Research and counseling implications. Journal of College Counseling, 2, 49-65.
11.
Cooper, K. J. (1983). Increasing the international relevance of U.S. education. In H. M. Jenkins & Associates (Eds.), Educating students from other nations: American colleges and universities in international educational interchange (pp. 277-294). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.
Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. W. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9, 284-295.
14.
Davis, T. M. (Ed.). (1995). Open doors 1994/1995: Report on international educational exchange. New York: Institute of International Education.
15.
Davis, T. M. (Ed.). (2000). Open doors 1999/2000: Report on international educational exchange. New York: Institute of International Education.
16.
Deressa, B., & Beaver, I. (1988). Needs assessment of international students in a College of Home Economics. Educational Research Quarterly, 12, 51-56.
17.
Dutton, J. E., & Ottensmeyer, E. (1987). Strategic issue management systems: Forms, functions and contexts. Academy of Management Review, 12, 355-365.
18.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
19.
Fallon, G., & Brown, R. B. (1999). What about the workers? Academic staff opinion about working with non-UK postgraduate students in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 23, 41-52.
20.
Fisher, M. (1985). Rethinking the “foreign TA problem”. In J. D. W. Andrews (Ed.), Strengthening the teaching assistant faculty (New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 22) (pp. 63-73). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
Goodwin, C. D., & Nacht, M. (1983). Absence of decision: Foreign students in American colleges and universities. New York: Institute of International Education.
22.
Il’Chenko, V. (1993). International education: The problem of integration. Russian Education and Society, 35(12), 81-95.
23.
Jacobs, L. C., & Friedman, C. B. (1988). Student achievement under foreign teaching associates compared with native teaching associates. Journal of Higher Education, 5, 551-563.
24.
Jenkins, H. M. (1983). Growth and impact of educational interchanges. In H. M. Jenkins & Associates (Eds.), Educating students from other nations (pp. 4-30). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
Kaplan, R. B. (1987). Foreign students: Developing institutional policy. The College Board Review, 143, 7-9, 28-30.
26.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Light, T. (1993). Erasing borders: The changing role of American higher education in the world. European Journal of Education, 28, 253-271.
28.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29.
Lulat, Y. G.-M., & Altbach, P. G. (1985). International students in comparative perspective: Toward a political economy of international study. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education handbook of theory and research (Vol. 1, pp. 439-495). New York: Agathon.
30.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Owie, I. (1982). Social alienation among foreign students. College Student Journal, 16, 163-165.
32.
Parr, G., Bradley, L., & Bingi, R. (1992). Concerns and feelings of international students. Journal of College Student Development, 33(1), 20-25.
33.
Penn, R. J., & Durham, M. L. (1978). Dimensions of cross-cultural interaction. Journal of College Student Personnel, 19, 264-267.
34.
Sarkodie-Mensah, K. (1998). International students in the U.S.: Trends, cultural adjustments, and solutions for a better experience. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 39, 214-222.
35.
Schneider, J. W., & De Meyer, A. (1991). Interpreting and responding to strategic issues: The impact of national culture. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 307-321.
36.
Selvadurai, R. (1992). Problems faced by international students in American colleges and universities. Community Review, 12(1/2), 27-32.
37.
Trice, A. G. (2002, October). Graduate international students’ isolation: Differing explanations from faculty and international students. Poster session presented at the annual Diversity and Learning Conference, Association of American Colleges and Universities, St. Louis, MO.
38.
Weick, K. E., & Daft, R. L. (1983). The effectiveness of interpretation systems. In K. S. Cameron & D. A. Whetten (Eds.), Organizational effectiveness: A comparison of multiple models (pp. 71-93). New York: Academic Press.
