Challenged by globalization (especially the General Agreement on Trade in Services [GATS]) and by European developments (the Bologna process), the Netherlands will introduce program accreditation as a new form of quality assurance. Other, sometimes similar initiatives are found in other countries and at the international level. How Dutch and other (European) proposals reply to the challenges is the topic of this article. Combining GATS and the Bologna process, four design rules for quality assurance systems are derived. It is concluded that “open accreditation systems” as introduced in some countries answer the European challenges well, but it is doubted if the Bologna process itself is a sufficient reaction to the wider international developments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adelman, C. (1992). Accreditation. In B. R. Clark & G. Neave (Eds.), The encyclopedia of higher education (Vol. 1, pp. 1313-1318). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
2.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (R. Nice, Trans., 2nd rev. ed.). London: Sage Ltd.
3.
Brennan, J., El-Khawas, E. H., & Shah, T. (1994). Peer review and the assessment of higher education quality: An international perspective. London: Open University.
4.
Brennan, J., Goedegebuure, L. C. J., Shah, T., Westerheijden, D. F., & Weusthof, P. J. M. (1992). Towards a methodology for comparative quality assessment in European higher education: A pilot study on economics in Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. London: Council for National Academic Awards.
5.
Campbell, D. T. (1975). On the conflicts between biological and social evolution and between psychology and moral tradition. American Psychologist, 30, 1103-1126.
6.
Commissie Accreditatie Hoger Onderwijs. (2001). Prikkelen presteren profileren: Eindrapport [Activate, achieve and advance: Final report]. Amsterdam: Van de Bunt.
7.
Council for Higher Education Accreditation. (1999). CHEA almanac of external quality review 1999. Washington, DC: Council for Higher Education Accreditation.
8.
Curran, P. J. (2000). Competition in UK higher education: Competitive advantage in the research assessment exercise and Porter's diamond model. Higher Education Quarterly, 54, 386-410.
9.
Elton, L. R. B. (2000). The UK research assessment exercise: Unintended consequences. Higher Education Quarterly, 54, 274-283.
10.
European Ministers of Education. (1999, June 19). Bologna declaration. Bologna, Italy: Author. Retrieved from http://www.unige.ch/eua
11.
European Ministers of Education. (2001, May 19). Towards the European higher education area [Communiqué of the meeting of European ministers in charge of higher education in Prague]. Prague: Author. Retrieved from http://www.unige.ch/eua
12.
Evaluation-report: Cross border quality assessment in physics (Lehre an Hochschulen, 24/2001). (2001). Hannover, Germany: Central Evaluation and Accreditation Agency.
13.
Frazer, M. (1997). Report on the modalities of external evaluation of higher education in Europe: 1995-1997. Higher Education in Europe, 12, 349-401.
14.
Friedman, M. (1953). Essays in positive economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Goedegebuure, L. C. J., Maassen, P. A. M., Phillips, T., & Smits, M. (1993). Dutch engineering programs in a European context: Vol. 1: Peer review report and major conclusions. Zoetermeer: Ministry of Education and Science.
16.
Harvey, L., & Knight, P. T. (1996). Transforming higher education. Buckingham, UK: Society for Research Into Higher Education & Open University Press.
17.
Henkel, M., & Little, B. (Eds.). (1999). Changing relationships between higher education and the state. London: Jessica Kingsley.
18.
Klemperer, A., van der Wende, M., & Witte, J. (2002). The introduction of bachelor- and master programmes in German higher education institutions. Güutersloh, Germany: Centre for Higher Education Development.
19.
Kokosalakis, N. (1999). Non-official higher education in the European Union: Synthesis document. In D. G. Tsaoussis (Ed.), Non-official higher education in the European Union (pp. 15-48). Athens: Gutenberg.
20.
Larsen, K., Morris, R., & Martin, J. P. (2001). Trade in educational services: Trends and emerging issues (Working paper CERI/CD/RD[201]6). Paris: Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development.
21.
Lenn, M. P., & Campos, L. (Eds.). (1998). Multinational discourse on professional accreditation, certification and licensure: Bridges for the globalizing professions. Washington, DC: Center for Quality Assurance in International Education.
22.
Mace, J. (2000). The RAE and university efficiency. Higher Education Review, 32(2), 17-35.
23.
Machado dos Santos, S. (2000). Introduction to the theme of transnational education. Paper presented at the conference of the Directors General for Higher Education and Heads of the Rectors” Conferences of the European Union, Aveiro.
24.
Marshall, J. (2002, January 4). UNESCO plays quality umpire. The Times Higher.
25.
McNay, I. (1997). The impact of the 1992 research assessment exercise in English universities. Higher Education Review, 29(2), 34-43.
26.
McNay, I. (1999). The paradoxes of research assessment and funding. In M. Henkel & B. Little (Eds.), Changing relationships between higher education and the state (pp. 191-203). London: Jessica Kingsley.
27.
Popper, K. R. (1980). The logic of scientific discovery (Rev. ed.). London: Hutchinson.
28.
Recognition of equivalency of accredited engineering education programs leading to the engineering degree. (1989). Washington, DC: Author.
29.
Sursock, A. (2001). Towards accreditation schemes for higher education in Europe? Final project report. Geneva, Switzerland: CRE Association of European Universities.
30.
Talib Ameen, A. (2000). The RAE and publications: A review of journal editors. Higher Education Review, 33, 32-40.
31.
Talib Ameen, A. (2001). The continuing behavioural modification of academics since the 1992 research assessment exercise. Higher Education Review, 33(3), 30-46.
32.
Thomas, H. G. (2001). Funding mechanism or quality assessment: Responses to the research assessment exercise in English institutions. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 23, 171-179.
33.
U.S. Delegation. (1998). Education services (S/C/W/55). World Trade Organization Council for Trade in Services. Retrieved from http://www.docsonline.wto.org
34.
U.S. Delegation. (2000). Higher (tertiary) education, adult education, and training (S/CSS/W/23). World Trade Organization Council for Trade in Services. Retrieved from http://www.docsonline.wto.org
35.
Van Damme, D. (2002, January 24). Quality assurance in an international environment: national and international interests and tensions. Paper presented at the Council for Higher Education Accreditation International Seminar, San Francisco.
36.
van der Wende, M. C. (2000). The Bologna declaration: Enhancing the transparency and competitiveness of European higher education. Higher Education in Europe, 25, 305-310.
37.
van der Wende, M. C. (2002). Hoger onderwijs globaliter: Naar nieuwe kaders voor onderzoek en beleid [Higher education globally: Towards new frameworks for research and policy]. Enschede: Universiteit Twente.
38.
van der Wende, M. C., & Lub, A. (2001). De Beleidsontwikkeling en implementatie van het bachelor-master systeem in het Nederlandse hoger onderwijs: Een vervolgonderzoek inzake de invoering van een bachelor-master structuur in het Nederlandse hoger onderwijs [Policy development and implementation of the bachelor-master system in Dutch higher education]. Enschede: Center for Higher Education Policy Studies.
39.
van Vught, F. A. (1994). Intrinsic and extrinsic aspects of quality assessment in higher education. In D. F. Westerheijden, J. Brennan, & P. A. M. Maassen (Eds.), Changing contexts of quality assessment: recent trends in West European higher education (pp. 31-50). Utrecht: Lemma.
40.
van Vught, F. A., van der Wende, M. C., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2002). Globalization and Internationalization: Policy Agendas Compared. In O. Fulton & J. Enders (Eds.), Higher education in a globalizing world. International trends and mutual observations (pp. 103-120). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
41.
van Vught, F. A., & Westerheijden, D. F. (1994). Towards a general model of quality assessment in higher education. Higher Education, 28, 355-371.
42.
van Vught, F. A., & Westerheijden, D. F. (1996). Institutional evaluation and management for quality: The CRE programme: Background, goals and procedures. CRE-Action, 107, 9-40.
43.
Vroeijenstijn, T. I., Waumans, B. L. A., & Wijmans, J. (1992). International programme review electrical engineering. Utrecht: Association of Dutch Universities.
44.
Westerheijden, D. F. (1990). Peers, performance, and power: Quality assessment in the Netherlands. In L. C. J. Goedegebuure, P. A. M. Maassen, & D. F. Westerheijden (Eds.), Peer review and performance indicators: Quality assessment in British and Dutch higher education (pp. 183-207). Utrecht: Lemma.
45.
Westerheijden, D. F. (1997). Quality assessment in Dutch higher education: Balancing improvement and accountability. European Journal for Education Law and Policy, 1, 81-90.
46.
Westerheijden, D. F. (2000, November 22-23). Public and private providers of knowledge: Prolegomena to research on changing images of Dutch Higher education in a globalising context. Paper presented at the Netherlands Institute of Government Conference “From Government to Governance,” Enschede.
47.
Westerheijden, D. F. (2001). Ex oriente lux? National and multiple accreditation in Europe after the fall of the wall and after Bologna. Quality in Higher Education, 7, 65-75.
48.
Westerheijden, D. F. (2003). Movements towards a European dimension in quality assurance and accreditation. In D. F. Westerheijden & M. Leegwater (Eds.), Working on the European dimension of quality (pp. 16-41). Zoetermeer: Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschappen.
49.
Westerheijden, D. F., & Leegwater, M. (Eds.). (2003). Working on the European dimension of quality. Zoetermeer: Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschappen.
50.
Westerheijden, D. F., & Lugthart, E. (1999). Banen naar techniek: Een vergelijking van technische opleidingen in Vlaanderen en Nederland [Trajectories toward engineering: Comparison of engineering study programmes in Flanders and the Netherlands]. In Hoger Instituut voor de Arbeid & Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (Eds.), Banen naar en in techniek: Vergelijking van opleidingen en arbeidskansen in techniek in Vlaanderen en Nederland. Rapport voor de ministeries van onderwijs van Vlaanderen en Nederland in het kader van het project Opleidingen en arbeidskansen van ingenieurs [Trajectories toward and jobs in engineering: Comparison of study programs and job perspectives in engineering in Flanders and the Netherlands. Report for the ministries of education of Flanders and the Netherlands in the framework of the project study programs and job perspectives of engineers.]. Leuven: Hoger Instituut voor de Arbeid.
51.
Westerheijden, D. F., & van der Wende, M. (2001, March 19-22). Who says B also has to say A? From Bologna to accreditation: Design requirements for quality assurance in Europe. Paper presented at the international network of quality assessment agencies conference, Bangalore.
52.
World Trade Organization Trade Policy Review Body. (2001). Overview of developments in the international trading environment: Annual report by the director-general (WT/TPR/OV/7). Retrieved from http://www.docsonline.wto.org
53.
Young, K. E., & Associates. (1983). Understanding accreditation: Contemporary perspectives on issues and practices in evaluating educational quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
