This Business of Internationalization: The Academic Experiences of 6 Asian MBA International Students at the University of Minnesota’s Carlson School of Management
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2001
This Business of Internationalization: The Academic Experiences of 6 Asian MBA International Students at the University of Minnesota’s Carlson School of Management
Conducted in the spring of 2000, this study looked at the academic experiences of 6 Asian international students at the University of Minnesota’s Carlson School of Management (CSOM). The research employed the case study methodology, with interviews, a classroom observation, and situational recall questionnaires as methods of data collection. The findings indicated culture shock, language barriers, and education shock as variables affecting the adjustment of these students, and are congruent with previous studies in this area. Students desired more preparation for academic expectations as well as the social environment before and during their studies at CSOM. They also asserted the need for increased international interest at CSOM.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Althen, G.
(1984). American ways: A guide for foreign students in the United States. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
2.
Ballard, B.
(1989). Social and cultural adjustment by foreign students: The Australian experience. In B. Ebuchi (Ed.), Foreign students and internationalization of higher education (pp. 160-172). Hiroshima, Japan: Research Institute for Higher Education.
3.
Bennett, M. J.
(1993). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In R. M. Paige (Ed.), Education for the intercultural experience (pp. 21-72). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
4.
Bornsztein, B. (1986). Why did they come? A study of the factors which influence the foreign student’s decision to apply for admission to selected graduate schools of education in the United States. Unpublished dissertation, University of Minnesota.
5.
Brown, S.
, & Masten, J. (1998). The role of a business school in an emerging country: The case of Ghana. Journal of Education for Business, 73, 308-313.
6.
Carlson School of Management
. (1998a). CSOM as the epicenter of a global educational network. Going global [Brochure]. Minneapolis, MN: CSOM International Programs.
7.
Carlson School of Management
. (1998b). Delivering excellence around the world. A new world of opportunities [Brochure]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
8.
Carlson School of Management. (n.d.). [Online]. Available: www.csom.umn.edu
9.
Clark, C. M.
, & Peterson, P. P. (1986). Teachers’thought processes. In M. Wittrock, Handbook of research on teaching (3rd Ed.). New York: Macmillan.
10.
Coalition for the Advancement of Foreign Languages and International Studies: Working Group on the Private Sector and International Education. (1989). Spanning the gap: Toward a better business and education partnership for international competence. Washington, DC: Coalition for the Advancement of Foreign Languages and International Studies.
11.
Daniel, C.
(1998). MBA: The first century. Cranbury, NJ: Associated University Press.
12.
Duke, C.
, & Victorova, I. (1998). Exploring joint programs across disciplines. Journal of Education for Business, 74(2), 99-102.
13.
Fasheh, M.
(1984). Foreign students in the United States: An enriching experience or a wasteful one?Contemporary Educational Psychology, 9, 313-321.
14.
Fischer, G.
(1979). American communication in a global society. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
15.
Gardener, B.
, & Korth, S. (1998). A framework for learning to work in teams. Journal of Business Education, 73(6), 28-33.
16.
Gutek, G. L.
(1986). Education in the United States. A historical perspective. Edgewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17.
Hoff, B. (1979). Classroom-oriented barriers to learning: International students in American higher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
18.
Hofstede, G.
(1984). Culture’s consequences. International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19.
Johnston, J. S.
, & Edelstein, R. (1993). Beyond borders—Profiles in international education. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and American Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business.
20.
Karasti, H. (1997). Using video to join analysis of work practice and system design: A study of an experimental teleradiology system and its redesign. Report from the University of Oulu, Finland, HCI & Group Technology Laboratory, Department of Information Processing Science.
21.
Kedia, B. L.
(1999). The CIBER agenda. In B. Toyne & D. Nigh (Eds.), International business, institutions and the dissemination of knowledge (pp. 65-84). Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
22.
Kerr, C.
(1975). Campus in transition. New York: Educational Facilities Laboratory.
23.
Ladd, P.
, & Ruby, R. (1999). Learning style and adjustment issues of international students. Journal of Education for Business, 74(4), 363-367.
24.
LaPidus, J.
(1994). Why foreign students attend U.S. graduate schools. In T.M. Davis (Ed.), Open doors 1993/94: Report on international educational exchange. New York: Institute of International Education. Also available online: www.opendoorsweb.org/lib%20pages/For20%studs/jules_b_lapidus.htm
25.
Leder, G.
(1998). Do teachers favor high achievers?Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 315-320.
26.
Lee, M. Y.
, Abd-Ella, M., & Burke, L. (1981). Needs of foreign students from developing nations at U.S. colleges and universities. Washington, DC: National Association for Foreign Student Affairs.
27.
Locke, R.
(1999). International management education in Western Europe, the United States, and Japan: A historian’s view. In B. Toyne & D. Nigh (Eds.), International business education (pp. 25-44). Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
28.
Marshall, C.
, & Rossman, G. (2000). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
Merriam, S.
(1997). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30.
Morine-Dershimer, G.
(1987). Practical examples of the practical argument: A case in point. Educational Theory, 37, 395-407.
31.
Morrison, J. L.
(1998). An international perspective for the next millennium— Business education for the seamless economy. Journal of Education for Business, 73 (6), 325-326.
32.
Mungazi, D. A.
(1993). Educational policy and national character: Africa, Japan, the United States, and the Soviet Union. Westport, CT: Praeger.
33.
Open Doors Report (2001). [Online]. Available: http://www.opendoorsweb.org
34.
Paige, R. M.
(1990). International students, cross-cultural psychological perspectives. In R. W. Brislin (Ed.), Applied cross-cultural psychology (pp. 161-185). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35.
Patton, M. Q.
(1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36.
Porter, R.
, & Samovar, L. A. (1997). An introduction to intercultural communication. In R. Porter & L. A. Samovar (Eds.), Intercultural communication, a reader (pp. 5-26). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
37.
Purdie, N. M.
, & Hattie, J. (1996). Cultural differences in the use of strategies for self-regulated learning (Japanese and Australian students). American Educational Research Journal, 33, 845-871.
38.
Rowan, R. (1993). The attitudes and opinions of international students studying in the College of Education at the University of Minnesota. Unpublished Plan B, University of Minnesota.
39.
Ruben, B. D.
, & Kealey, D. J. (1979). Behavioral assessment of communication competency and the prediction of cross-cultural adaptation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 3(1), 133-133.
40.
Scott, J.
(1999). Developing cultural fluency: The goal of international business communication instruction in the 21st century. Journal of Education for Business, 74(3), 140-143.
41.
Smith, M.
, & Steward, J. F. (1999). Communication for a global economy. Business Education Forum, 54(2), 24-27.
42.
Stake, R.
(1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
Stecklein, J. E.
(with the University of Minnesota Bureau of Institution Research). (1971). Attitudes of foreign students toward educational experiences at the University of Minnesota. Minneapolis: Bureau of Institutional Research, University of Minnesota.
44.
Stefani, L. A.
(1997). The influence of culture on classroom communication. In L. A. Samovar & R. E. Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communication, a reader (pp. 349-364). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
45.
Steglitz, I. (1993). Intercultural perspective-taking: The impact of studying abroad. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
46.
Storti, C.
(1989). The art of crossing cultures. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
47.
Tannen, D.
(1998). The argument culture: What other ways are there? Listening to another culture. New York: Random House.
48.
Thomas, K.
, & Althen, G. (1989). Counseling foreign students. In P. B. Pedersen, J. G. Draguns, W. J. Lonner, & J. E. Trimble (Eds.), Counseling across cultures (pp. 205-241). Honolulu: University of Hawaii.
49.
Ting-Toomey, S.
(1998). Intercultural conflict competence. In J. N. Martin, T. K. Nakayama, & L. A. Flores (Eds.), Readings in cultural contexts (pp. 401-414). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
50.
Toyne, B.
, & Nigh, D. (1999). International business, institutions and the dissemination of knowledge. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
51.
White, D. S.
, & Griffith, D. A. (1998). Graduate international business education in the U.S.—Comparisons and suggestions. Journal of Education for Business, 74(2), 103-115.
