Does Fulbright Make a Difference? The Turkish Perspective

Abstract

This article reports on the findings of a research project carried out by a team of faculties at the Middle East Technical University and the Fulbright Education Committee in Turkey. The project aimed to investigate the Fulbright program's professional, personal, and social impacts and its effectiveness from the perspectives of Turkish scholars. Data were collected by mail from 277 Fulbright scholars living in various regions of Turkey. All of the scholars agreed that their Fulbright experience in the United States had had positive effects on their professional, social, and personal lives. Scholars were especially satisfied with the effect on their personal lives. For example, the Fulbright experience broadened their world viewpoint in a flexible and international setting. These results suggest that Fulbright scholars contribute to the development of the country, because many of them hold high-ranking positions that allow them to develop and implement policies in different sectors. For the development of the Fulbright program, it is recommended that continuous follow-up studies be conducted to identify its strengths and weaknesses.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Archwametry, T. (1996). Perceptions of the impact of international education: Japanese vs. American students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, April 1996.

Arndt, R. (1987). Questioning the Fulbright experience. In Te Fulbright Experience 1946-1986: Encounters and Transformation. A. Dudden and R. Dynes , eds., New Brunswick, NJ.: Transaction Books, pp. 30-45.

Carlson, Jerry S. et. al. (1991). Study Abroad: The Experience of American Undergraduates in Western Europe and the United States. Occasional Papers on International Educational Exchange Research Series, ERIC NO. ED340322.

Heppner, P. P. (1988). Cross-cultural outcomes of a research Fulbright in Sweden. The Counseling Psychologist, 16, no. 2, pp. 297-302.

Immelman, A. and Schneider, P. (1998). Assessing students learning in study-abroad programs: A conceptual framework and methodology for assessing students learning in study-abroad programs. Journal of Studies in International Education, fall 1998, pp. 59-79.

Kuroda, K. (1995). Foreign study for development and dependency of developing countries? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April 1995, pp. 18-22.

Lindsay, B. (1989). Integrating international education and public diplomacy: Creative partnerships or ingenious propaganda? Comparative Education Review, 33, no. 4, pp. 423-436.

McWhirter, J. J. (1988). Implications of the Fulbright senior scholar program for counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 16, no. 2, pp. 307-310.

Underwood, D. G. (1994). Sometimes more is better: Development and implementation of a Graduate Alumni survey to increase response rates and evaluate strategic planning. Paper presented at the annual forum of the Association for Institutional Research, New Orleans, Louisiana, May 29-June 1, 1994.

10.

Uyeki, E. (1993). As others see us: A comparison of Japanese and American Fulbrighters, ERIC NO. ED365205.