Restricted accessOtherFirst published online 2004-3
Vers un modèle d'évaluation de l'efficacité des interventions communautaires en promotion de la santé : compte-rendu de quelques développements Nord-américains récents1
Aguirre-Molina, M., & Gorman, D.M. (1996). Community-based approaches for the prevention of alcohol, tobacco and other drug use. Annual Review of Public Health, 17, 337-358.
2.
Best, A., Stokols, D., Green, L.W., Leischow, S., Holmes, B., & Buchholz, K. (2003). An integrative framework for community partnering to translate theory into effective health promotion strategy. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18(2), 168-176.
3.
The COMMIT Research Group. (1995a). Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT): I. Cohort results from a four-year community intervention. American Journal of Public Health, 85(2), 183-192.
4.
The COMMIT Research Group. (1995b). Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT): II. Changes in adult cigarette smoking prevalence. American Journal of Public Health, 85(2), 193-200.
5.
Dahler-Larson, P. (2001). From programme theory to constructivism: On tragic, magic and competing programmes. Evaluation, 7(3), 331-349.
6.
Dixon-Woods, M., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2001). Qualitative research in systematic reviews has established a place for itself. British Medical Journal, 323, 765-766.
7.
Fisher, E.B., Jr. (1995). The results of the COMMIT trial. Community intervention trial for smoking cessation. American Journal of Public Health , 85(159-160).
Heron, J. (1996). Co-operative inquiry: Research into the human condition. London: Sage Publications .
10.
Hills, M., & Mullett, J. (2000). Methodologies and methods for community-based research and evaluation. Victoria, BC: University of Victoria, Community Health Promotion Coalition.
11.
Hills, M.O'Neill, M.Carroll, S.MacDonald, M. (2004); Effectiveness of Community Initiatives to Promote Health: An Assessment Tool; Research report submitted to Health Canada on behalf of the Canadian Consortium of Health Promotion Research; 223 pages.
12.
Holder, H.D. (2001). Prevention research and its actual application to health services. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 28(2), 118-130.
13.
Israel, B.A., Schulz, A.J., Parker, E.A., & Becker, A.B. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173-202.
14.
Kemmis, D. (1990). Community and the Politics of Place. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press .
15.
Labonte, R. (1996). Community health promotion strategies. In Paho (Ed.), Health Promotion: An anthology (pp. 138-148). Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization.
16.
Merzel, C., & D'Afflitti, J. (2003). Reconsidering community-based health promotion: Promise, Performance, and Potential. American Journal of Public Health, 93(4), 557-575.
17.
Minkler, M., Thompson, M., Bell, J., & Rose, K. (2001). Contributions of community involvement to organizational-level empowerment: The Federal Healthy Start Experience. Health Education and Behavior, 28(6), 783-807.
18.
Paho. (2003). Participatory evaluation of healthy municipalities: A practical resource kit for action (Draft): PAHO .
19.
Pawson, R. (2002a). Evidence-based policy: In search of a method. Evaluation, 8(2), 157-181.
20.
Pawson, R. (2002b). Evidence-based policy: The promise of `realist synthesis'. Evaluation, 8(3), 340-358.
21.
Petticrew, M. (2003). Why certain systematic reviews reach uncertain conclusions. British Medical Journal, 326:756-758.
22.
Potvin, L., & Richard, L. (2001). Evaluating community health promotion programmes . In I. Rootman & M. Goodstadt & B. Hyndman & D. V. McQueen & L. Potvin & J. Springett & E. Ziglio (Eds.), Evaluation in health promotion: Principles and perspectives. Copenhagen: WHO Europe.
23.
Richard, L., Potvin, L., Kishchuk, N., Prlic, H., & Green, L.W. (1995). Assessment of the intergration of the ecological approach in health promotion programs. American Journal of Health Promotion, 10, 318-328.
24.
Rose, G. (1985). Sick individuals and sick populations. International Journal of Epidemiology, 14, 32-38.
25.
Roussos, S., & Fawcett, S.B. (2000). A review of collaborative partnership as a strategy for improving community health. Annual Review of Public Health , 21, 369-402.
26.
Schwartz, S., Susser, E., and Susser, M. (1999). A future for epidemiology? Annual Review ofPublic Health, 20, 15-33.
27.
Sorensen, G., Emmons, K., Hunt, M.K., & Johnston, D. (1998). Implications of the results of Community Intervention Trials. Annual Review of Public Health, 19 (1), 379-417.
28.
Susser, M. (1995). Editorial: The tribulations of trials- Intervention in communities. American Journal of Public Health, 85 (2), 156-158.
29.
Susser, M., & Susser, E. (1996a). Choosing a future for epidemiology: I. eras and paradigms. American Journal of Public Health, 86 (5), 668-674.
30.
Susser, M., & Susser, E. (1996b). Choosing a future for epidemiology: II. from black box to Chinese boxes and eco-epidemiology. American Journal of Public Health, 86 (5), 674-678.
31.
Thompson, B., Coronado, G., Snipes, S.A., & Puschel, K. (2003). Methodological advances and ongoing challenges in designing community-based health promotion programs. Annual Review of Public Health, 24, 315-340.
32.
Tones, K., & Tilford, S. (1994). Health promotion: Effectiveness, efficiency and equity. London: Chapman and Hall .
33.
Vingilis, E., & Pederson, L. (2002). Using the right tools to answer the right questions: The importance of evaluative research techniques for health services evaluation research in the 21st century. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 16 (2), 1-26.
34.
Wandersman, A., & Florin, P. (2003). Community interventions and effective prevention . American Psychologist, 58 (6,7), 441-447.
35.
Whitehead, A.N. (1967). Adventures of ideas (originally written in 1933)Free Press Edition.
