Evans (1998) “ What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal .” JAMA (280): 231-233http://www.ama-assn.org/public/peer/7_15_98/jpv71033.htm [accessed 10/12/02].
2.
Committee on Publication Ethics (1999) The COPE Report. http://www.publicationethics.org.uk/cope1999/gpp/gpp_peer.phtml [accessed 19/12/02]
3.
Goldbeck-Wood, S. (1998) “What makes a good reviewer of manuscripts? ” BMJ (316): 86.
4.
Harnad, S. (2000) “The Invisible Hand of Peer Review.” Exploit Interactive(5): http://www.exploit-lib.org/issue5/peer-review/ [accessed 19/12/02]. Müllner, M. (2002) “Peer review.” BMJ (324): 1283.
5.
van Rooyen, S., F. Godlee, S. Evans, N. Black and R. Smith (1999) “Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial.” BMJ (318): 23-27.
6.
van Rooyen, S., F. Godlee, S. Evans, R. Smith and N. Black (1998) “Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review.” JAMA (280): 224-237http://www.ama-assn.org/public/peer/7_15_98/jpv71017.htm [accessed 19/12/02].
