KentD.L., LarsonE.B.Disease, level of impact, and quality of research methods. Three dimensions of clinical efficacy assessment applied to magnetic resonance imaging.Invest Radiol1992; 27(3): 245–54.
2.
PerezC.A.Methodology of research and practice for the third millennium: evidence-based medicine.Rays2000; 25(3): 285–308.
3.
PhillipsD.P., ChristenfeldN., GlynnL.M.Increase in US medication - error deaths between 1983 and 1993.Lancet1998; 351(9103): 643–44.
4.
SozaH.Reducing medical errors through technology.Cost Qual2000; 6(3): 24–5.
5.
CutlerD.M., McClellanM.The productivity of cancer care; 2001. (Unpublished paper, Harvard University).
6.
CutlerD.M., MearaE.The technology of birth: Is it worth it?Frontiers in Health Policy Research, Vol. 3 ed. A Garber (Cambridge, Maa.: MIT Press) 2000: 33–67.
JohnsonE., DeboldV.P., ChuangD.Telemedicine: an annotated bibliography: part I.Telemed J1996; 1(2): 155–65.
9.
DonabedianA.Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring, Vol I: The Definition of Quality and Approaches to its Assessment.Ann Arbor: Health Adm. Press. 1980, pp 163.
10.
BrickJ.E., BashshurR.L., BrickJ.F.Public knowledge, perception, and expressed choice of telemedicine in rural West Virginia.Telemed J1997; 3(2): 159–72.
11.
PenchanskyR., ThomasJ.W.The concept of access: definition and relation to consumer satisfaction.Med Care1981; 19(2): 127–40.
12.
StarfieldB.Is US healthcare really the best in the world?JAMA2000; 284(4): 483–5.
13.
BlendonR.J., BensonJ., DonelanK.Who has the best health care system? A second look.Health Aff (Millwood)1995; 14(4): 221–30.
14.
RogersE.M.Diffusion of Innovations.New York: Free Press. 4th ed, 1995.
15.
LevySandraSurvey says: DTC advertising, R&D driving up drug costs.Drug Topics; Oradell; April 1, 2002.
16.
HillmanB.J., JosephC.A., MabryM.R.Frequency and costs of diagnostic imaging in office practice - comparison of self referring and radiologist-referring physicians.N Engl J Med1990; 323(23): 1604–8.
17.
WoolfS.H., KamerowD.B.Testing for uncommon conditions: the heroic search for positive test results.Arch Intern Med1990; 150(12): 2451–8.
18.
DeKayM.L., AschD.A.Is the defensive use diagnostic tests good for patients, or bad?Med Decis Making1998; 18(1): 19–28.
19.
DeyoR.A.Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumber spine.Terrific test or tar baby? N Engl J Med1994; 331(2): 115–6.
20.
JarvikJ.G.Deyo RA. Imaging of lumbar intervertebral disk degeneration and aging, excluding disk herniations. Radiol.Clin North Am2000; 38(6): 1265–6.
21.
OsterweisM., KleinmanA., MechanicD., eds. Pain and Disability: Clinical, Behavioral and Public Policy Perspective.Washington, DC: Natl. Academy, 1951, pp 204.
22.
BlackW.C., WelchH.G.Advances in diagnostic imaging and overestimation of disease prevalence and the benefits of therapy.N Engl J Med1993; 328(17): 1237–43.
23.
EspelandA., BaerheimA., AlberkstenG.Patients' views on importance and usefulness of plain radiography for low back pain.Spine2001; 26(12): 1356–63.
24.
FrybackD.G., ThornburyJ.R.The efficacy of diagnostic imaging.Med Decis Making1991; 11(2): 88–94.
25.
RonaldR LongA little technology goes a long way.Healthcare Financial Management; Dec, 2001.
26.
HuninkM.G.Outcomes research and cost-effectiveness analysis in Radiology.Eur Radiol1996; 6(5): 615–20.
27.
PhilbinE.F., McCulloughP.A., DisalvoT.G.Under use of Invasive procedures among Medicaid patients with acute myocardial infarction.Am J Public Health2001; 91(7): 1082–8.