This article builds on Whitley's comparison of the business systems and global commodity chains approaches to the study of economic organization within and across nations and regions. My objective is to provide a fuller exposition of the logic and evidence underlying the emergence, evolution, and variation in buyer-driven and producer-driven commodity chains. While there are clearly national differences within commodity chains, the idea that nations matter more than industrial sectors in generating contrasting forms of economic organization in global capitalism remains debatable. One of the central propositions of the commodity chains perspective is that globalization tends to diminish the influence of national origins on business systems. The way firms do business in the international economy thus is determined to an increasing extent by their position in global commodity chains, not their national origins. Nonetheless, because they highlight different units and levels of analysis, the business systems and commodity chains approaches are best viewed as complementary (rather than competing) theoretical frameworks.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AppelbaumR.P.GereffiG. (1994), “Power and Profits in the Apparel Commodity Chain,” pp. 42–62 in Bonacich (eds.) Global Production: The Apparel Industry in the Pacific Rim, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
2.
BainJ. (1968), Industrial Organization, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
3.
BonacichE.ChengL.ChinchillaN.HamiltonN.OngP. (eds.) (1994), Global Production: The Apparel Industry in the Pacific Rim, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
4.
ChengL-L.GereffiG. (1994), “The Informal Economy in East Asian Development,”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 18(2), 194–219.
5.
DruckerP. (1992), “The Economy's Power Shift,”Wall Street Journal, September 24.
6.
EvansP. (1995), Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
GereffiG. (1983), The Pharmaceutical Industry and Dependency in the Third World, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
GereffiG. (1990), “Big Business and the State,” pp. 90–109 in GereffiG.WymanD. L. (eds.) Manufacturing Miracles: Paths of Industrialization in Latin America and East Asia, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
GereffiG. (1994), “The Organization of Buyer-Driven Global Commodity Chains: How U.S. Retailers Shape Overseas Production Networks,” pp. 95–122 in GereffiG.KorzeniewiczM. (eds.) Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism, Westport, CT: Praeger.
10.
GereffiG. (1995), “Global Production Systems and Third World Development,” pp. 100–142 in StallingsB. (ed.) Global Change, Regional Response: The New International Context of Development, New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
GereffiG. (1996), “Commodity Chains and Regional Divisions of Labor in East Asia,”Journal of Asian Business, 12(1), 75–112.
12.
GereffiG.KorzeniewiczM. (1990), “Commodity Chains and Footwear Exports in the Semiperiphery,” pp. 45–68 in MartinWilliam G. (ed.) Semiperipheral States in the World-Economy, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
13.
GereffiG.KorzeniewiczM. (eds.) (1994), Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism, Westport, CT: Praeger.
14.
GereffiG.PanM-L. (1994), “The Globalization of Taiwan's Garment Industry,” pp. 126–146 in Bonacich (eds.) Global Production: The Apparel Industry in the Pacific Rim, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
15.
GriecoJ. (1984), Between Dependency and Autonomy: India's Experience with the International Computer Industry, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
16.
HarrisonB. (1994), Lean and Mean, New York: Basic Books.
17.
HoffmanK.RushH. (1988), Micro-Electronics and Clothing: The Impact of Technical Change on a Global Industry, New York: Praeger.
18.
HumphreyJ. (ed.) (1995), Special issue of World Development (Vol. 23, No. 1, January) on “Industrial Organization and Manufacturing Competitiveness in Developing Countries,”Oxford: Pergamon.
19.
Japan Textile News (1996), “Japan's Distribution and Retail Industry,”JTN Quarterly, 2(2), 14–30.
20.
KitscheltH. (1991), “Industrial Governance Structures, Innovation Strategies, and the Case of Japan: Sectoral or Cross-National Comparative Analysis?”International Organization, 45, 4(Autumn), 453–493.
LevyB.KuoW-J. (1991), “The Strategic Orientations of Firms and the Performance of Korea and Taiwan in Frontier Industries: Lessons from Comparative Case Studies of Keyboard and Personal Computer Assembly,”World Development, 19(4), 363–374.
23.
NewfarmerR. (ed.) (1985), Profits, Progress and Poverty: Case Studies of International Industries in Latin America, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
24.
OETH (L'Observatoire Européen du Textile et de l'Habillement) (1995), The EU Textile and Clothing Industry 1993/94, Brussels: OETH.
25.
PioreM.J.SabelC.F. (1984), The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity, New York: Basic Books.
26.
PorterM.E. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: Free Press.
27.
PrahaladC.K.HamelG. (1990), “The Core Competence of the Corporation,”Harvard Business Review, 90(3), 79–93.
28.
PykeF.BecattiniG.SengenbergerW. (eds.) (1990), Industrial Districts and Inter-firm Cooperation in Italy, Geneva: International Institute for Labor Studies.
29.
PykeF.SengenbergerW. (eds.) (1992), Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration, Geneva: International Institute for Labor Studies.
30.
SchefferM. (1994), The Changing Map of European Textiles: Production and Sourcing Strategies of Textile and Clothing Firms, Brussels: L'Observatoire Européen du Textile et de l'Habillement.
ShaferD.M. (1994), Winners and Losers: How Sectors Shape the Developmental Prospects of States, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
33.
StorperM.WalkerR. (1989), The Capitalist Imperative: Territory, Technology, and Industrial Growth, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
34.
U.S. Office of Technology Assessment (1987), The U.S. Textile and Apparel Industry: A Revolution in Progress, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment.
35.
WestneyD.E. (1993), “Institutionalization Theory and the Multinational Corporation.” pp. 53–76 in GhoshalS.WestneyD. E. (eds.) Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation, New York: St. Martin's Press.
36.
WhitleyR.D. (1992a), Business Systems in East Asia: Firms, Markets and Societies, London: Sage.
37.
WhitleyR.D. (ed.) (1992b), European Business Systems, London: Sage.
38.
WhitleyR.D. (1994), “Dominant Forms of Economic Organisation in Market Economies,”Organization Studies, 15(2), 153–182.
39.
WhitleyR.D. (1996), “Business Systems and Global Commodity Chains: Competing or Complementary Forms of Economic Organization?”Competition & Change, 1(4), 415–425.
