Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Repeated crises have proven credit rating agency (CRA) models/methods erroneous and “business-as-usual” unsustainable. Nevertheless, considerable dubious “default risk” management and technoscientific capitalist expertise remain unchanged. Unpacking sovereign ratings, we appreciate how “debt sustainability analysis” (DSA) distortions underpin expertocratic CRA (default) anomaly. Their neoliberal “politics of limits” performance helps market (shareholder) imperatives trump those of democratic (stakeholder) politics. Given surging inflation and debt (distress) to remedy Covid-19-induced shocks, ratings aid constitute and (re)validate the subjectivities/affinities and organizational conditions advancing a “self-equilibrating,” “self-generative” agencement political economy of creditworthiness (PEC). Antagonizing sustainable budgetary government’s programmatic/expertocratic and operational/democratic asymmetry, econophysics ratings diminish fiscal sovereignty. Universal PEC management through hybrid credit risk/uncertainty qualculation mitigates negative externality contestation shielding CRAs from serious reform. Ratings procyclicality and contagion reinforce this precarious sociotechnical agencement PEC as the status quo.

Keywords

credit ratings risk/uncertainty management democracy sovereign debt expertocracy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Afonso

Gomes

Taamouti

(2014) Sovereign credit ratings and financial markets volatility. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 76: 20–33.

Beckert

(2016) Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics. Cambridge, UK: HUP.

Best

(2014) Governing Failure: Provisional Expertise and the Transformation of Global Development Finance. Cambridge, UK: CUP.

Beunza

Stark

(2012) From dissonance to resonance: Cognitive interdependence in quantitative finance. Economy and Society 41(3): 383–417.

Binici

Hutchison

Miao

(2020) Market price effects of agency sovereign debt announcements. International Review of Economics & Finance 69: 769–787.

Birch

Muniesa

(2020) Assetization: Turning Things into Assets in Technoscientific Capitalism. London, UK: MIT Press.

Black

Scholes

(1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy 81(3): 637–654.

Callon

(2016) Revisiting marketization: From interface-markets to market-agencements. Consumption Markets & Culture 19(1): 17–37.

Callon

Muniesa

(2005) Economic markets as calculative collective devices. Organization Studies 26(8): 1229–1250.

10.

Carruthers

(2013) From uncertainty toward risk: Case of credit ratings. Socio-Economic Review 11(3): 525–551.

11.

Cochoy

(2008) Calculation, qualculation, calqulation. Marketing Theory 8(1): 15–44.

12.

Coffee

(2006) Gatekeepers: The Professions and Corporate Governance. New York, NY: OUP.

13.

de Goede

(2005) Virtue, Fortune, and Faith: A Genealogy of Finance. Minneapolis, USA: University of Minnesota Press.

14.

Deville

(2016) Debtor publics: Tracking the participatory politics of consumer credit. Consumption Markets & Culture 19(1): 38–55.

15.

Dittrich

(2007) The Credit Rating Industry: Competition and Regulation. Morrisville: Lulu Press.

16.

Dorn

(2012) Knowing markets: Would less be more? Economy and Society 41(3): 316–334.

17.

Duffie

Singleton

(2003) Credit Risk Pricing, Measurement, and Management. Princeton, USA: PUP.

18.

Eijffinger

(2012) Rating agencies: Role and influence of their sovereign credit risk assessment in the eurozone. Journal of Common Market Studies 50(6): 912–921.

19.

ESMA (2020) ESMA Supervision – Annual Report 2019 and Work Programme 2020. Paris, France: ESMA.

20.

European Commission (2021) Debt Sustainability Monitor 2020. Brussels: EU.

21.

Fitch Ratings (2014) Sovereign rating criteria. New York, NY: Fitch Ratings.

22.

Gaillard

(2012) A Century of Sovereign Ratings. New York, NY: Springer.

23.

Gapen

Gray

Lim

, et al. (2008) Measuring and analyzing sovereign risk with contingent claims. IMF Staff Papers 55(1): 109–148.

24.

Garland

(2003) The rise of risk. In: Ericson

Doyle

(eds), Risk and morality. Toronto, USA: UofT Press, pp. 48–86.

25.

Gärtner

Griesbach

Jung

(2011) PIGS or lambs? The European sovereign debt crisis and the role of rating agencies. International Advances in Economic Research 17(3): 1–12.

26.

Graeber

(2011) Debt: The First 5,000 Years. Brooklyn, USA: Melville House.

27.

Helleiner

(2014) The Status Quo Crisis: Global Financial Governance after the 2008 Meltdown. New York, NY: OUP.

28.

IMF (2010) Global Financial Stability Report: Sovereigns, Funding, and Systemic Liquidity. Washington, DC: IMF.

29.

IMF (2022) World Economic Outlook: Rising Caseloads, Disrupted Recovery, and Higher Inflation. Washington, DC: IMF.

30.

International Organization of Securities Commissions (2020) Sustainable Nance and the Role of Securities Regulators and IOSCO. Madrid: IOSCO.

31.

Jarrow

Turnbull

(1995) Pricing derivatives on financial securities subject to credit risk. Journal of Finance 50(1): 53–85.

32.

Kiff

Kisser

(2020) Rating through-the-cycle: Implications for rating stability and accuracy? Washington, DC: IMF Working Paper.

33.

Krippner

(2011) Capitalizing on Crisis: Political Origins of the Rise of Finance. Cambridge, UK: HUP.

34.

Langley

(2014) Liquidity Lost: Governance of the Global Financial Crisis. Oxford, UK: OUP.

35.

Lépinay

(2011) Codes of Finance: Engineering Derivatives in a Global Bank. Princeton, USA: PUP.

36.

Löffler

(2013) Can rating agencies look through the cycle? Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 40(4): 623–646.

37.

Lowe

(2002) Credit Risk Measurement and Procyclicality. Basel, Switzerland: BIS. Working Paper No. 116.

38.

MacKenzie

(2006) An Engine, Not a Camera. Cambridge, UK: MIT Press.

39.

MacKenzie

(2011) Credit crisis as a problem in the sociology of knowledge. American Journal of Sociology 116: 1778–1841.

40.

Maurer

(2002) Repressed futures: Financial derivatives’ theological unconscious. Economy and Society 31(1): 15–23.

41.

Merton

(1973) Theory of rational option pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 4: 141–183.

42.

Mikes

(2009) Risk management and calculative cultures. Management Accounting Research 20: 18–40.

43.

Moody’s, Analytics (2010) CDS-I-EDF credit metrics in European bank and sovereign markets. New York, NY: Moody’s Analytics.

44.

Moody’s, Analytics (2013) Portuguese sovereign market risk measures undergo correction. New York, NY: Moody’s Analytics.

45.

Moody’s Investors Service (2008/2019) Moody’s Rating Methodology: Sovereign Bond Rating. New York, NY: MIS.

46.

Moody’s Investors Service (2012) Moody’s Downgrades Italy’s Bond Rating Baa2 from A3. New York, NY: MIS.

47.

Moody’s Investors Service (2018). Spain and Portugal are better placed than Italy for transition to post-QE environment. New York, NY: MIS.

48.

Moody’s Investors Service (2020a). Rating symbols and definitions. New York, NY: MIS.

49.

Moody’s Investors Service (2020b) The Causes of Sovereign Defaults. New York, NY: MIS.

50.

OECD (2021) Sovereign Borrowing Outlook. Paris, France: OECD.

51.

Partnoy

(2006) How and why credit rating agencies are not like other gatekeepers. In: Yasuyuki

Litan

(eds), Financial Gatekeepers: Can They Protect Investors.Washington, DC: Brookings Institute, pp. 59–99.

52.

Pasquale

(2015) The Black Box Society: Secret Algorithms that Control Money and Information. Cambridge, UK: HUP.

53.

Paudyn

(2014) Credit Ratings and Sovereign Debt: The Political Economy of Creditworthiness through Risk and Uncertainty. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

54.

Paudyn

(2015) The struggle to perform the political economy of creditworthiness. Journal of Cultural Economy 8(6): 655–672.

55.

Preda

(2009) Framing Finance: Boundaries of Markets and Modern Capitalism. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.

56.

PRI (2022). ESG in credit risk and ratings. Available at www.unpri.org (accessed 21 May 2022).

57.

Reinhart

Rogoff

(2010) Growth in a time of debt. American Economic Review 100(2): 573–578.

58.

Sinclair

(2005) The New Masters of Capital: American Bond Rating Agencies and the Politics of Creditworthiness. London, UK: Cornell University Press

59.

Standard and Poor’s (2017) Sovereign Rating Methodology. New York, NY: S&P.

60.

Standard and Poor’s (2021a) Default, Transition, and Recovery: 2020 Annual Sovereign Default Study and Rating Transitions. New York, NY: S&P.

61.

Standard and Poor’s (2021b) Global Ratings Definitions. New York, NY: S&P.

62.

Stiglitz

Heymann

(eds), (2014). Life after Debt: The Origins and Resolutions of Debt Crisis. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

63.

Svetlova

(2018) Financial Models and Society: Villains or Scapegoats? Cheltenham, USA: Edward Elgar.

Financially engineering a “self-generative” political economy of creditworthiness: Expertocratic exemption problems for sustainable debt and democracy

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References