This paper explores the transformation of the German employment and industrial relations model from a political economy approach. Using the IAB Establishment Panel, the evolution of atypical employment and the coverage of the dual system of industrial relations is analysed in different groups of firms. Additionally, using a shift-share technique, we estimate the impact of the change in the employment structure on this process. The results reveal that once institutional constraints were relaxed, firms across the whole economy increased their use of flexible work and individualized the wage bargaining. Moreover, our findings suggest that structural change played a minor role in the process.
AddisonJ (2017) The demise of a model? The state of collective bargaining and worker representation in Germany. Economic and Industrial Democracy38(2): 193–234.
2.
AddisonJTeixeiraPPahnkeAy, et al. (2016) Is the erosion thesis overblown? Alignment from without in Germany. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society55(3): 414–443.
3.
AddisonJTeixeiraPZwickT (2011) German work councils and the anatomy of wages. Industrial and Labor Relations Review63(2): 247–270.
4.
Baccaro L and Howell C (2017) Trajectories of Neoliberal Transformation: European Industrial Relations Since the 1970s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BaccaroLBenassiC (2017) Throwing out the ballast: Growth models and the liberalization of German industrial relations. Socio-Economic Review15(1): 85–115.
6.
BaccaroLHowellC (2011) A common neoliberal trajectory: The transformation of industrial relations in advanced capitalism. Politics & Society39(4): 521–563.
7.
BenassiC (2016) Liberalization only at the margins? Analysing the growth of temporary work in German core manufacturing sectors. British Journal of Industrial Relations53(3): 533–555.
8.
BenassiCDorigattiL (2015) Straight to the core – Explaining union responses to the casualization of work: The IG Metall campaign for agency workers. British Journal of Industrial Relations54(3): 597–622.
9.
CarlinWSoskiceD (2009) German economic performance: disentangling the role of supply-side reforms, macroeconomic policy and coordinated economy institutions. Socio-Economic Review7(1): 67–99.
10.
De AvillezR (2012) Sectoral contributions to labour productivity growth: Does the choice of decomposition formula matter?International Productivity Monitor (24): 97–117.
11.
DoellgastVGreelI (2007) Vertical disintegration and the disorganization of German industrial relations. British Journal of Industrial Relations45(1): 55–76.
12.
DustmannCLudsteckJSchönbergU (2009) Revisiting the German wage structure. Quarterly Journal of Economics124(2): 843–881.
13.
EichhorstW (2015) The unexpected appearance of a new German model. British Journal of Industrial Relations53(1): 49–69.
14.
EichhorstWMarxP (2011) Reforming German labour market institutions: A dual path for flexibility. Journal of European Social Policy21(1): 73–87.
15.
EichhorstWTobschV (2015) Not so standard anymore? Employment duality in Germany. Journal for Labour Market Research48: 81–95.
16.
EllguthPGernerHDStegmaierJ (2014a) Wage effects of works councils and opening clauses: The German case. Economic and Industrial Democracy35(1): 95–113.
17.
EllguthPKohautSMöllerI (2014b) The IAB Establishment Panel – Methodological essentials and data quality. Journal for Labour Market Research47(1–2): 27–41.
18.
FernándezRPalazuelosE (2012) European Union Economies Facing ‘Baumol’s Disease’ within the Service Sector. Journal of Common Market Studies50(2): 231–249.
19.
FischerGJanikFMüllerD, et al. (2009) “The IAB Establishment Panel: Things users should know”. Schmollers Jahrbuch129(1): 133–148.
20.
FrankeRKalmbachP (2005) Structural change in the manufacturing sector and its impact on business-related services: An input-output study for Germany. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics16: 467–488.
21.
FreemanRBLazearEP (1995) An economic analysis of work councils. In: Rogers J and Streeck W (eds) Work Councils. Consultation, Representation and Cooperation in Industrial Relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp.27–52.
22.
FrenchS (2000) The impact of unification on German industrial relations. German Politics9: 195–216.
23.
GlynA (2007) Capitalism Unleashed: Finance, Globalization, and Welfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
GoldschmidtDSchmiederJF (2017) The rise of domestic outsourcing and the evolution of the German wage structure. The Quarterly Journal of Economics132(3): 1165–1217.
25.
HaipeterT (2013) Erosion, exhaustion or renewal? New forms of collective bargaining in Germany in K.V.W. stone. In: Arthurs H (ed) Rethinking Workplace Regulation: Beyond the Standard Contract of Employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp.115--134.
26.
HallPASoskiceD (eds) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
HasselA (1999) The erosion of the German system of industrial relations. British Journal of Industrial Relations37(3): 483–505.
28.
HasselA (2014) The paradox of liberalization – understanding dualism and the recovery of the German political economy. British Journal of Industrial Relations52(1): 57–81.
29.
JürgensU (2004) An elusive model – Diversified quality production and the transformation of the German automobile industry. Competition & Change8(4): 411–423.
30.
KädtlerJSperlingHJ (2002) After globalization and financialization: Logics of bargaining in the German automotive industry. Competition & Change6(2): 149–168.
31.
KellerBSeifertH (2013) Atypical employment in Germany. Forms, development, patterns. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research19(4): 457–474.
32.
MarxPStarkeP (2017) Dualization as a destiny? The political economy of the German minimum wage reform. Politics & Society45(4): 559–584.
33.
MöllerJ (2015) Did the German model survive the labor market reforms?Journal for Labour Market Research48: 151–168.
34.
Müller S and Stegmaier J (2020) Why is there resistance to work councils in Germany? An economic perspective. Economic and Industrial Democracy 41(3): 540--561.
35.
OberfichtnerMSchnabelC (2019) The German model of industrial relations: (Where) does it still exist?Jahrbücher Für Nationalökonomie Und Statistik239(1): 5–37.
36.
PalierBThelenK (2010) Institutionalizing dualism: Complementarities and change in France and Germany. Politics & Society38(I): 119–148.
37.
ProsserT (2016) Dualization or liberalization? Investigating precarious work in eight European countries. Work, Employment and Society30(6): 949–965.
38.
PulignanoVMeardiGDoerflingerN (2015) Trade unions and labour market dualisation: a comparison of policies and attitudes towards agency and migrant workers in Germany and Belgium. Work, Employment and Society29(5): 808–825.
39.
ReisenbichlerAMorganKJ (2012) From ‘sick man’ to ‘miracle’: Explaining the robustness of the German labor market during and after the financial crisis 2008–09. Politics & Society40(4): 549–579.
40.
RuedaD (2007) Social Democracy inside out: Partisanship and Labour Market Policy in Advanced Industrialized Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
SeifertHMassa-WirthH (2005) Pacts for employment and competitiveness in Germany. Industrial Relations Journal36(3): 217–240.
42.
SharpeA (2009) The paradox of market-oriented public policy and poor productivity growth in Canada. In: A Festschrift in honour of David Dodge’s contributions to Canadian public policy (Conference held by the Bank of Canada), pp.135–191.
43.
SilviaS (1997) German unification and emerging divisions within German Employers’ Associations. Cause or catalyst?Comparative Politics29(2): 187–208.
44.
SilviaSSchroederW (2007) Why are German associations declining? Arguments and evidence. Comparative Political Studies40(2): 1433–1459.
45.
SchultenT (2018) The role of extension in German collective bargaining. In: Hayter S and Visser J (eds) Collective Agreements: Extending Labour Protection. Geneva: ILO Publications, pp.65–92.
46.
SchultenTBispinckR (2018) Varieties of decentralisation in German collective bargaining. In: Leonardi S and Pedersini R (eds) Multi-employer bargaining under pressure. Decentralisation trends in five European Countries, ETUI, pp.105–149. Brussels: ETUI.
47.
StreeckW (1997) German capitalism: Does it exist? Can it survive?New Political Economy2(2): 237–256.
48.
StreeckW (2009) Re-Forming Capitalism. Institutional Change in the German Political Economy. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
49.
StreeckW (2010) Taking capitalism seriously: Towards an institutionalist approach to contemporary political economy. Socio-Economic Review9: 137–167.
50.
StreeckWThelenK (2005) Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In: Streeck W and Thelen K (eds) Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.1–39.
51.
ThelenK (2009) Institutional change in advanced political economies. British Journal of Industrial Relations47(3): 471–498.
52.
ThelenK (2014) Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
53.
TraxlerF (1996) Collective bargaining and industrial change: A case of disorganization? A comparative analysis of eighteen OECD countries. European Sociological Review12(3): 271–287.
54.
Umkehrer M (2017) Combining the waves of the IAB Establishment Panel: a do-file for the basic data preparation of a panel data set in stata. FDZ Methodenreport 201712_en, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
55.
VitolsS (2004) Continuity and change. Making sense of the German model. Competition & Change8(4): 331–337.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
