This article scrutinizes the impact of foreign bond ownership on market discipline, that is the mutual responsiveness of financial markets and sovereign borrowers. The empirical investigation covers 12 advanced economies during the Great Moderation (1981–2008). This article finds no evidence that foreign bond investors affect the sensitivity of bond spreads to fiscal policy. Reversely, results show that government responsiveness to market pressure is contingent on the make-up of its investor base. Bond spreads spur on fiscal consolidation. The larger the share of foreign bond investors, the bigger this effect.
AbbasSBlattnerLDe BroeckM, et al. (2014) Sovereign debt composition in advanced economies: A historical perspective. IMF Working Paper No. 14/162. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
2.
AdlerG (2012) Intertwined sovereign and bank solvencies in a model of self-fulfilling crisis. IMF Working Paper No. 12/178. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
3.
Allan and Scruggs (2004) Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies. American Journal of Political Science 48(3): 496--512.
4.
AlesinaAPerottiR (1995)
The political-economy of budget deficits. Staff Papers – International Monetary Fund42(1): 1–31.
5.
Andritzky (2010). Government bonds and their investors: What are the facts and do they matter? (No. 12-158). International Monetary Fund.
6.
AndritzkyJ (2012) Government bonds and their investors: What are the facts and do they matter? IMF Working Paper No. 12/158. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
7.
ArghyrouMGKontonikasA (2012)
The EMU sovereign-debt crisis: Fundamentals, expectations and contagion. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money22(4): 658–677.
8.
ArslanalpSPoghosyanT (2014) Foreign investor flows and sovereign bond yields in advanced economies. IMF Working Paper No. 14/27. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
9.
Arslanalp S and Takahiro T (2014) Tracking global demand for advanced economy sovereign debt. IMF Economic Review 62(3): 430--464.
10.
ArslanalpSTsudaT (2012) Demand for government debt of advanced economies: A new database. IMF Working Paper. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
11.
BanCGaborD (2016)
The political economy of shadow banking. Review of International Political Economy23(6): 901–914.
12.
Baum CF, Schaffer ME and Stillman S (2003) Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing. The Stata Journal 3(1): 1--31.
13.
Beck T, Clarke G, Groff A, et al. (2001) New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions. World Bank Economic Review 15: 165--176.
14.
BeltranDKretchmerMMarquezJ, et al. (2012) Foreign Holdings of U.S. Treasuries and U.S. Treasury Yields.
Washington, DC:
Federal Reserve Board.
15.
BowmanAErturkIFroudJ, et al. (2012)
Central bank-led capitalism. Seattle University Law Review36: 455.
16.
BraunBGaborD (2019) Central banking, shadow banking, and infrastructural power. In: Mader P, Mertens D, van der Zwan N (eds) International Handbook of Financialization. London: Routledge, pp.356--348.
17.
BreenMMcMenaminI (2013)
Political institutions, credible commitment, and sovereign debt in advanced economies. International Studies Quarterly57(1): 842–854.
CohenB (1998) The Geography of Money.
Ithaca:
Cornell University Press.
22.
CohenB (2003) The new geography of money. In: GilbertEHelleinerE (eds) Nation-States and Money: The past, Present and Future of National Currencies.
London:
Routledge, pp.122–142.
23.
CoxH (2016) The Market as God.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
24.
CulpepperPReinkeR (2014)
Structural power and bank bailouts in the United Kingdom and the United States. Politics & Society42(4): 427–454.
25.
CulpepperP (2015)
Structural power and political science in the post-crisis era. Business and Politics17(3): 391–409.
26.
DavisODempsterMWildavskyA (1966)
A theory of the budgetary process. American Political Science Review60(3): 529–547.
DeegRHardieI (2016)
What is patient capital and who supplies it?Socio-Economic Review14(4): 627–645.
29.
Dell’ErbaSMattinaTRoitmanA (2013) Pressure or prudence? Tales of market pressure and fiscal adjustment. IMF Working Paper No. 13/170. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
DiamondDRajanR (2011)
Fear of fire sales, illiquidity seeking, and credit freezes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics126(2): 557–591.
32.
DinasEGemenisK (2010)
Measuring parties’ ideological positions with manifesto data: A critical evaluation of the competing methods. Party Politics16(4): 427–450.
33.
DuttaS (2018)
Sovereign debt management and the globalization of finance: Recasting the City of London’s ‘Big Bang’. Competition & Change22(1): 3–22.
34.
FastenrathFSchwanMTrampuschC (2017)
Where states and markets meet: The financialisation of sovereign debt management. New Political Economy22(3): 273–293.
35.
FaveroCPaganoMVon ThaddenE (2010)
How does liquidity affect government bond yields?Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis45(1): 107–134.
36.
FriedmanT (2000) The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization.
New York, NY:
Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
37.
Gabor D (2016) The (impossible) repo trinity: the political economy of repo markets. Review of International Political Economy 23(6): 967-1000.
38.
GaborDVestergaardJ (2018)
Chasing unicorns: The European single safe asset project. Competition & Change22(2): 139–164.
39.
Garrett and Mitchell (2001) Globalization, government spending and taxation in the OECD. European Journal of Political Research 39(2): 145--177.
40.
GelpernA (2018) About government debt … who knows? Capital Markets Law Journal. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/cmlj/kmy017 (accessed 1 October 2018).
41.
GrabelI (2015)
The rebranding of capital controls in an era of productive incoherence. Review of International Political Economy22(1): 7–43.
42.
GravelleT (1999) Liquidity of the Government of Canada Securities Market: Stylized Facts and Some Market Microstructure Comparisons to the United States Treasury Market.
Ottawa, ON:
Bank of Canada.
43.
GreenJLaveryS (2018)
After neoliberalisation? Monetary indiscipline, crisis and the state. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers43(1): 79–94.
44.
GuichardSKennedyMWurzelE, et al. (2007) What promotes fiscal consolidation? OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 553. Paris, France: OECD.
45.
HardieI (2012) Financialization and Government Borrowing Capacity in Emerging Markets.
Basingstoke:
Palgrave Macmillan.
HelgadóttirO (2016)
The Bocconi boys go to Brussels: Italian economic ideas, professional networks and European austerity. Journal of European Public Policy23(3): 392–409.
48.
HirschmanAO (1970) Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
49.
HübscherE (2015)
The politics of fiscal consolidation revisited. Journal of Public Policy36(4): 573–601.
IronsideK (2014)
Rubles for victory: The social dynamics of state fundraising on the Soviet home front. Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History15(4): 799–828.
53.
JaramilloLZhangY (2013) Real Money Investors and Sovereign Bond Yields. IMF Working Paper No. 13/254. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
54.
Jennifer HD (2001) Does Capital Mobility Cause Regulatory Convergence? In: Structure and Agency in International Capital Mobility (eds K Thomas and T Sinclair), pp. 27--53. London: Macmillian.
55.
JohnsonJBarnesA (2015)
Financial nationalism and its international enablers: The Hungarian experience. Review of International Political Economy22(3): 535–569.
56.
JonesE (1989) Budgets, Banks, and Belgium: Government Debt and its Captive Markets.
New York,NY:
mimeo.
KamikawaR (2013) Market-based Banking in Japan: From the Avant-Garde to Europe’s Future. In: HardieIHowarthD (eds) Market-Based Banking and the International Financial Crisis.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp.218–249.
59.
KarcherSSteinbergA (2013)
Assessing the causes of capital account liberalization: How measurement matters. International Studies Quarterly57(1): 128–137.
KnafoS (2010)
Critical approaches and the legacy of the agent/structure debate in international relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs23(3): 493–516.
62.
KorpiWPalmeJ (2003)
New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: Welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975–1995. American Political Science Review97(1): 425–446.
63.
Krishnamurthy and Vissing-Jorgensen (2007). The demand for Treasury debt (No. w12881). National Bureau of Economic Research.
McCarthyMSorsaVvan der ZwanN (2016)
Investment preferences and patient capital: Financing, governance, and regulation in pension fund capitalism. Socio-Economic Review14(4): 751–769.
72.
McKinnonR (1973) Money and Capital in Economic Development.
Washington, DC:
Brookings Institution.
73.
McMenamin I, Breen M and Muñoz-Portillo J (2015) Austerity and credibility in the Eurozone. European Union Politics 16(1): 45--66.
74.
McMenaminIBreenMMuñoz PortilloJ (2015)
Austerity and credibility in the Eurozone. European Union Politics16(1): 45–66.
75.
MassóM (2016)
The effects of government debt market financialization: The case of Spain. Competition & Change20(3): 166–186.
76.
MaxfieldS (1998) Gatekeepers of Growth: The International Political Economy of Central Banking in Developing Countries.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
MosleyL (2000)
Room to move: International financial markets and national welfare states. International Organization54(3): 737–773.
79.
MosleyL (2003) Global Capital and National Governments.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
80.
MolnarM (2012) Fiscal consolidation: Part 5, what factors determine the success of consolidation efforts? OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 936. Paris, France: OECD.
OrphanidesA (2017) ECB Monetary Policy and Euro Area Governance: Collateral Eligibility Criteria for Sovereign Debt. MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 5258-17. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
87.
ParenteauR (2005) The late 1990s’ US bubble: Financialization in the extreme. In: Epstein G (ed.) Financialization and the World Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.111–148.
88.
PelizzoR (2003)
Party positions or party direction? An analysis of party manifesto data. West European Politics26(2): 67–89.
SarkozyN (2012) Cited in Debrun X and Kinda T (2013) That Squeezing Feeling: the Interest Burden and Public Debt Stabilization. IMF Working Paper No. 13/125. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
97.
Sinclair T (2005) The new masters of capital: American bond rating agencies and the politics of creditworthiness. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
StreeckW (2014) Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism.
Brooklyn:
Verso.
101.
TiroleJ (2012)
Overcoming adverse selection: How public intervention can restore market functioning. American Economic Review102(1): 29–59.
102.
ToozeA (2018) Crashed: How a Decade of Financial Crises Changed the World.
New York:
Viking.
103.
TrampuschC (2019)
The financialization of the state: Government debt management reforms in New Zealand and Ireland. Competition & Change23(1): 3–22.
104.
TsebelisG (1995)
Decision making in political systems: Veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science25: 289–326.
Viral A and Sascha S (2013) Handbook on Systemic Risk. In: Analyzing systemic risk of the European banking sector (eds JP Fouque and J Langsam), pp. 247--282. Cambridge: Cambridge Univserity Press.
107.
Von HagenJSchuknechtLWolswijkG (2011)
Government bond risk premiums in the EU revisited: The impact of the financial crisis. European Journal of Political Economy27(1): 36–43.
108.
WagschalUWenzelburgerG (2008)
Roads to success: Budget consolidations in OECD countries. Journal of Public Policy28(3): 309–339.
109.
WarnockFWarnockV (2009)
International capital flows and U.S. interest rates. Journal of International Money and Finance28(6): 903–919.
WellhausenR (2015)
Bondholders vs. direct investors? Competing responses to expropriation. International Studies Quarterly59(4): 750–764.
112.
WoodruffD (2016)
Governing by panic: The politics of the Eurozone crisis. Politics & Society44(1): 81–116.
113.
ZellnerATheilH (1962)
Three-stage least squares: Simultaneous estimation of simultaneous equations. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society30(1): 54–78.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
