This paper examines the impact of renewable energy policies as well as three renewable energy policy instruments (demand pull, technology push and systemic) and their interactions on renewable energy innovation in 15 European Union member states for the period 1995–2014. We first develop a conceptual framework and hypotheses, and then we test these by employing a unique and comprehensive data set. We find that renewable energy policies as a whole as well as demand pull and technology-push instruments affect renewable energy innovation positively and significantly. The impact of interactions between instruments on renewable energy innovation is also positive and significant, but that of specific pairs of instrument interaction is contingent on the specification used. We discuss reasons for these findings, implications for public policy, as well as limitations and opportunities for further research.
AguayoFGallagherKHekkertMet al. (2012) Chapter 24: Policies for the energy technology innovation system (ETIS). In: JohanssonTBPatwardhanANakicenovicNet al. (eds) Global Energy Assessment.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, pp.1665–1743.
2.
ArnoldEFarlaKKolarzPet al. (2014) The Case for Public Support of Innovation: At the Sector, Technology and Challenge Area Levels.
London:
Crown.
3.
AtkinsonABStiglitzJE (1980) Lectures on Public Economics. 2nd ed.
Oxford:
Princeton University Press.
4.
BaileyDCowlingK and TomlinsonP (eds) (2015) New Perspectives on Industrial Policy for a Modern Britain.
Oxford:
OUP.
5.
BeckFMartinotE (2004) Renewable energy policies and barriers. In: ClevelandCJ (ed) Encyclopedia of Energy.
Boston:
Elsevier, pp.365–383.
6.
BledaMdel RíoP (2013)
The market failure and the systemic failure rationales in technological innovation systems. Research Policy42: 1039–1052.
7.
BlundellRGriffithRvan ReenenJ (1995)
Dynamic count data models of technological innovation. Economic Journal105: 333–344.
8.
Böhringer C, Cuntz A, Harhoff D, et al. (2014) The Impacts of Feed-in Tariffs on Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Germany. Munich: CESifo Group, CESifo Working Paper Series 4680.
9.
BootsM (2003)
Green certificates and carbon trading in the Netherlands. Energy Policy31: 43–50.
10.
Boots M, Schaeffer G, De Zoeten-Dartenset C, et al. (2001) The Interaction of Tradable Instruments in Renewable Energy and Climate Change Markets – Final Report (ECN-C-01-048). The Netherlands: Energy research Centre of the Netherlands.
11.
BrunnermeierSBCohenMA (2003)
Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management452: 278–293.
12.
Campos J, Ericsson NR and Hendry DF (2005) General-to-Specific Modeling: An Overview and Selected Bibliography. International Finance Discussion Papers – Number 838, 1–92.
13.
CantnerUGrafHHerrmannJet al. (2016)
Inventor networks in renewable energies: The influence of the policy mix in Germany. Research Policy45: 1165–1184.
14.
CherniJAKentishJ (2007)
Renewable energy policy and electricity market reforms in China. Energy Policy35(7): 3616–3629.
15.
ChristensenJLDrejerIAndersenPHet al. (2016)
Innovation policy: How can it best make a difference?Industry and Innovation23(2): 135–139.
16.
CIEEM (2015) EU Environmental Legislation and UK Implementation.
Hampshire:
Chartered Institute of Ecological and Environmental Management.
17.
CoenenLTrufferB (2012)
Places and spaces of sustainability transitions: Geographical contributions to an emerging research and policy field. European Planning Studies20(3): 367–374.
18.
CohenWMLevinthalDA (1990)
Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly35(1): 128–152.
19.
CostantiniVCrespiFMartiniCet al. (2015)
Demand-pull and technology-push public support for eco-innovation: The case of the biofuels sector. Research Policy44(3): 577–595.
20.
DechezleprêtreAGlachantM (2014)
Does foreign environmental policy influence domestic innovation? Evidence from the wind industry. Environmental and Resource Economics58(3): 391–413.
21.
De VriesFPWithagenC (2005) Innovation and environmental stringency: The case of sulphur dioxide abatement. CentER Discussion Paper Series No. 2005-18.
22.
del RioP (2014)
On evaluating success in complex policy mixes: The case of renewable energy support schemes. Policy Sciences47: 267–287.
23.
del RioPKlessmannCWinkelTet al. (2013) Interactions Between EU GHG and Renewable Energy Policies – How Can They be Coordinated? Spain: European IEE project beyond2020 (work package 7, deliverable 7.2).
24.
EC COM 130 final/2 (2014) Taking Stock of the Europe 2020 Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth.
Brusseld:
European Commission.
25.
EdlerJGeorghiouL (2007)
Public procurement and innovation: Resurrecting the demand side. Research Policy36(7): 949–963.
26.
EEA (2016) Renewable Energy in Europe 2016: Recent Growth and Knock-on Effects (Report No 4/2016).
Luxembourg:
Publications Office of the European Union.
27.
European Commission (1997) Energy for the Future: Renewable Sources of Energy. White Paper for a Community Strategy and Action Plan, COM(97) 599 Final.
Luxembourg:
European Commission.
28.
European Commission (2001) Directive 2001/77/EC.
Luxembourg:
European Commission.
29.
European Commission (2009) Directive 2009/30/EC Amending Directive 98/70/EC and Directive 1999/32.
Luxembourg:
European Commission.
FouquetD (2013)
Policy instruments for renewable energy – From a European perspective. Renewable Energy49: 15–18.
33.
FurmanJLPorterMESternS (2002)
The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy31: 899–933.
34.
GheorghiouLEdlerJUyarraEet al. (2014)
Policy instruments for public procurement of innovation: Choice, design and assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change86: 1–12.
35.
GoulderLH (2013)
Climate change policy's interactions with the tax system. Energy Economics40: S3–S11.
36.
GreeneWH (1994) Accounting for Excess Zeros and Sample Selection in Poisson and Negative Binomial Regression Models.
New York:
Stern School of Business.
37.
GrobaFBreitschopfB (2013) Impact of Renewable Energy Policy and Use on Innovation: A Literature Review.
Berlin:
Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung. [Discussion Papers 1318].
38.
GrotenhuisMTThijsP (2015) Dummy variables and their interactions in regression analysis: Examples from research on body mass index. Available at: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1511/1511.05728.pdf (accessed 5 March 2018).
39.
GuerzoniMRaiteriE (2015)
Demand-side vs. supply-side technology policies: Hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix. Research Policy44: 726–747.
40.
GunninghamNSinclairD (1998) Designing Smart Regulation.
Paris:
OECD/International Energy Agency.
41.
HelmD (2010)
Government failure, rent-seeking, and capture: The design of climate change policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy26(2): 182–196.
HodsonMMarvinS (2010)
Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were?Research Policy39: 477–485.
44.
HoppmannJPetersMSchneiderMet al. (2013)
The two faces of market support – How deployment policies affect technological exploration and exploitation in the solar photovoltaic industry. Research Policy42: 989–1003.
45.
HorbachJRammerCRenningsK (2012)
Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact – The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics78: 112–122.
46.
Howlett MP and Rayner J (2013, 30 May) Patching vs Packaging: Complementary Effects, Goodness of Fit, Degrees of Freedom And Intentionality in Policy Portfolio Design. Lille: ESEE Meetings.
47.
JacobssonSBergekA (2003) Transforming the energy sector: The evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology. In: JacobKBinderMWieczorekA (eds) Governance for Industrial Transformation.
Berlin:
Environmental Policy Research Centre, pp.208–236.
48.
JaffeABPalmerK (1996)
Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study. Review of Economics and Statistics 79(4): 610–619.
49.
JaffeABNewellRGStavinsRN (2005)
A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy. Ecological Economics54(2-3): 164–174.
50.
JohnstoneNHaščičIPoppD (2008)
Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: Evidence based on patent counts. Environmental and Resource Economics451: 133–155.
51.
Johnstone N, Hascic I and Kalamova M (2010) Environmental policy characteristics and technological innovation. Economia Politica 275–299.
52.
KauttoNArastoASijmJet al. (2012)
Interaction of the EU ETS and national climate policy instruments – Impact on biomass use. Biomass and Bioenergy38: 117–127.
53.
KernFHowlettM (2009)
Implementing transition management as policy reforms: A case study of the Dutch energy sector. Policy Sciences42: 391–408.
54.
KimKKimY (2015)
Role of policy in innovation and international trade of renewable energy technology: Empirical study of solar PV and wind power technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews44: 717–727.
55.
KlevorickAKLevinRCNelsonRRet al. (1995)
On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy24(2): 185–205.
56.
KnightE (2012)
The economic geography of financing clean energy technologies. Competition and Change16(2): 77–90.
57.
LandiniFLeeKMalerbaF (2017)
A history-friendly model of the successive changes in industrial leadership and the catch-up by latecomers. Research Policy46(2): 431–446.
58.
LangsdorfS (2011) EU Energy Policy: From the ECSC to the Energy Roadmap 2050.
Brussels:
Green European Foundation.
59.
LanjouwJOModyA (1996)
Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology. Research Policy254: 549–571.
60.
LeeKLeeS (2013)
Patterns of technological innovation and evolution in the energy sector: A patent-based approach. Energy Policy415–432.
61.
LuukkonenT (2000)
Additionality of EU framework programmes. Research Policy29: 711–724.
62.
MabeeWESaddlerJN (2007) Forests and Energy in OECD Countries.
OCED:
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
63.
MagroEWilsonJR (2013)
Complex innovation policy systems: Towards an evaluation mix. Research Policy42: 1647–1656.
64.
MarquesACFuinhasJA (2012)
Are public policies towards renewables successful? Evidence from European countries. Renewable Energy44: 109–118.
65.
MartinBR (2016)
R&D policy instruments – a critical review of what we do and don’t know. Industry and Innovation23(2): 157–176.
66.
MattiCConsoliDUyarraE (2016)
Multi level policy mixes and industry emergence: The case of wind energy in Spain. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space1–23.
67.
MazzucatoM (2013) The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths.
London:
Anthem Press.
68.
MichalenaEHillsJM (2012)
Renewable energy issues and implementation of European energy policy: The missing generation?Energy Policy45: 201–216.
NelsonAJ (2009)
Measuring knowledge spillovers: What patents, licenses and publications reveal about innovation diffusion. Research Policy38: 994–1005.
72.
NelsonRR (ed) (1993) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis.
New York:
Oxford University Press.
73.
NemetGF (2009)
Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change. Research Policy38: 700–709.
74.
NestaLVonaFNicolliF (2014)
Environmental policies, competition and innovation in renewable energy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management67(3): 396–411.
75.
OECD (1996) The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities (Oslo Manual).
Paris:
DSTI, OECD.
76.
OECD (2001)
Using patent counts for cross-country comparisons of technology outputs. STI Review27: 129–146.
77.
OECD (2011a) Interactions between Emission Trading Systems and Other Overlapping Policy Instruments.
Paris:
General Distribution Document, Environment Directorate.
OikonomouV (2004) A Qualitative Analysis of White, Green Certificates and EU CO2 Allowances. Phase II of the White and Green Project (Draft Report).
Utrecht:
Utrecht University.
80.
OikonomouVJepmaCJ (2008)
A framework on interactions of climate and energy policy instruments. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change13: 131–156.
81.
OltraV (2008) Environmental Innovation and Industrial Dynamics: The Contributions of Evolutionary Economics.
France:
Cahiers du GREThA n° 2008-28.
82.
PesaranMH (1974)
On the general problem of model selection. Review of Economic Studies41(2): 153–171.
83.
PetersMSchneiderMGriesshaberTet al. (2012)
The impact of technology-push and demand-pull policies on technical change – Does the locus of policies matter?Research Policy41: 1296–1308.
84.
PitelisCNTeeceDJ (2009)
The (new) nature and essence of the firm. European Management Review6(1): 5–15.
85.
PoppD (2006)
International innovation and diffusion of air pollution control technologies: The effects of NOX and SO2 regulation in the US, Japan, and Germany. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management51(1): 46–71.
86.
RawlinsMAllalH (2003) Renewable Energy Technologies and Kyoto Protocol Mechanisms.
Belgium:
European Commission.
87.
REN21 (2015) Renewables 2015: Global Status Report. France: RE21.
88.
RenningsK (2000)
Redefining innovation – Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics32: 319–332.
89.
RoggeKReichardtK (2016)
Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis. Research Policy45(8): 1620–1635.
90.
RomerP (1990)
Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy98: S71–S102.
91.
RosenbergN (1974)
Science, invention and economic growth. EconomicJournal84(333): 90–108.
92.
RosenbergN (1990)
Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)?Research Policy19(2): 165–174.
93.
ScarlatNDallemandJ-FMonforti-FerrarioFet al. (2015)
Renewable energy policy framework and bioenergy contribution in the European Union – An overview from national renewable energy action plans and progress reports. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews51: 969–985.
94.
SchoonhovenCB (1981)
Problems with contingency theory: Testing assumptions hidden within the language of “theory”. Administrative Science Quarterly26: 349–377.
95.
SchumpeterJ (1934) The Theory of Economic Development.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
96.
SijmJPvan DrilAW (2003) The Interaction between the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and Energy Policy Instruments in the Netherlands. Netherlands: ECN-C–03-060 - Interaction in EU Climate Policy (INTERACT).
97.
Simões I, Huppes G and Seixas J (2005) A tangled web: assessing overlaps between energy and environmental policy instruments in place along electricity systems. In S Attali and K Tillerson (eds) Energy Savings: What Works and Who Delivers? ECEEE Summer Study Proceedings V 1-3. Sweden: European Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
98.
SmithK (2004) Chapter 6: Measuring innovation. In: FagerbergJMoweryDCNelsonRR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp.478–178.
99.
SmithsRKuhlmannS (2004)
The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy1: 4–32.
100.
Sorrell S, Boemare C, Betz R, et al. (2003) Interaction in EU Climate Policy … final report to DG research under the framework V project ‘Interaction in Climate Policy’. University of Sussex, Brighton: Science and Technology Policy Research.
101.
SterkWDienstCHarmelingSet al. (2007) Renewable Energy and the Clean Development Mechanism: Potential, Barriers and Ways Forward – A Guide for Policy-Makers.
Berlin:
Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) - Public Relations Division.
102.
SternN (2006) The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review.
Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
103.
Stoneman P (ed) (1995) Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell Publishers.
VenkatramanN (1989)
The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. The Academy of Management Review14(3): 423–444.
108.
WagnerM (2007) The Link between Environmental Innovation, Patents, andEnvironmental Management. Copenhagen: DRUID Working Papers, n°07-14.
109.
WanglerLU (2013)
Renewables and innovation: Did policy induced structural change in the energy sector effect innovation in green technologies. Environmental Planning Management56: 211–237.
110.
WeberMKRohracherH (2012)
Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy41(6): 1037–1047.
111.
WieczorekAJHekkertMP (2012)
Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: A framework for policy makers and innovation scholars. Science and Public Policy39: 74–87.
112.
World Bank (2010) World Development Report: Development and Climate Change.
Washington:
The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
113.
WüstenhagenRMenichettiE (2012)
Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: Conceptual framework and opportunities for further research. Energy Policy40: 1–10.
114.
WustenhagenRWolsinkMBurerMJ (2007)
Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy35: 2683–2691.
115.
ZhaoJJiarongA (1998) Study of China's Economic Incentive Policies for Renewable Energy Development.
China:
China Environmental Sciences Publishing House.
