This paper contributes to the understanding of competition and industry evolution by analysing how submarket dynamics and agency influence the development of the emerging industrial field of Danish offshore wind energy. We argue that industry evolution is sensitive to the balance between integration, overlap and disintegration across submarkets. This balance depends on how strategic intent and behaviour influence submarket dynamics, leading to the conclusion that effects of agency and managerial intent should play a more prominent role in studies of industry evolution.
AbernathyWJUtterbackJM (1978) Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review80: 40–47.
2.
AndersenPHDrejerI (2008) Systemic innovation in a distributed network. Strategic Organization6: 13–46.
3.
AndersenPHDrejerI (2012) Denmark – The Wind Power Hub: Transforming the Supply Chain, Copenhagen: The Danish Wind Energy Association.
4.
AndersonPTushmanML (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly35: 604–633.
5.
ArthurWB (1988) Competing technologies: An overview. In: DosiGFreemanCNelsonR (eds) Technical Change and Economic Theory, London: Pinter Publishers.
6.
ArthurWB (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal99: 116–131.
7.
BennerMJTripsasM (2012) The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management Journal33: 277–302.
8.
BergekAOnufreyK (2013) Is one path enough? Multiple paths and path interaction as an extension of path dependency theory. Industrial and Corporate Change23: 1261–1297.
9.
BhaskarabhatlaAKlepperS (2014) Latent submarket dynamics and industry evolution: Lessons from the US laser industry. Industrial and Corporate Change23: 1381–1415.
10.
BilgiliMYasarASimsekE (2011) Offshore wind power development in Europe and its comparison with onshore counterpart. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews15: 905–915.
11.
BoschmaR (2015) Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Regional Studies49: 733–751.
12.
BuenstorfGKlepperS (2010) Submarket dynamics and innovation: The case of the U.S. tire industry. Industrial and Corporate Change19: 1563–1587.
13.
ChristensenJF (2011) Industrial evolution through complementary convergence: The case of IT security. Industrial and Corporate Change20: 57–89.
14.
DavidPA (1985) Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review75: 332–337.
15.
DobuschLSchüßlerE (2013) Theorizing path dependence: A review of positive feedback mechanisms in technology markets, regional clusters, and organizations. Industrial and Corporate Change22: 617–647.
16.
DosiG (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy11: 147–162.
17.
FaiF (2003) Corporate Technological Competence and the Evolution of Technological Diversifivation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
18.
FrenkenKVan OortFVerburgT (2007) Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies41: 685–697.
19.
FunkJ (2014) Industry architecture. The product life cycle and entrepreneurial opportunities: The case of the US broadcasting sector. Industrial and Corporate Change24: 65–91.
20.
GarudRKarnøeP (2003) Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy32: 277–300.
21.
GovaertG (2009) Data Analysis, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Hanneman R and Riddle M (2005) Introduction to Social Network Analysis. Riverside: University of California. Available at: http://faculty.ucr.edu/∼hanneman/nettext/ (accessed 11 January 2017).
24.
HoffmanAJ (1999) Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal42: 351–371.
25.
JensenIK (2003) Mænd i modvind – et dansk industrieventyr, Copenhagen: Børsens Forlag.
26.
KaplanSTripsasM (2008) Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Research Policy37: 709–805.
27.
KarnøeP (1991) Dansk vindmølleindustri; Om innovationer, industriudvikling og teknologipolitik: En overraskende international succes, Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
28.
KellerMRNegoitaM (2013) Correcting network failures: The evolution of US Innovation Policy in the wind and advanced battery industries. Competition and Change17(4): 319–338.
29.
KetchenDJShookCL (1996) The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: An analysis and critique. Strategic Management Journal17: 441–458.
30.
KlepperS (1997) Industry life cycles. Industrial and Corporate Change6: 145–181.
31.
KlepperS (2002) Firm survival and the evolution of oligopoly. RAND Journal of Economics33: 37–61.
32.
KlepperSThompsonP (2006) Submarkets and the evolution of market structure. RAND Journal of Economics37: 861–886.
33.
LeeTW (1999) Using Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
34.
MalerbaF (2007) Innovation and the evolution of industries. In: CantnerUMalerbaF (eds) Innovation, Industrial Dynamics and Structural Transformation: Schumpeterian Legacies, Berlin: Springer.
35.
MartinRSunleyP (2011) Conceptualizing cluster evolution: Beyond the Life Cycle Model?Regional Studies45: 1299–1318.
36.
MintzbergH (2007) Tracking Strategies. Toward a General Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
MitchellMSkrzypaczA (2015) A theory of market pioneers, dynamic capabilities, and industry evolution. Management Science61: 1598–1614.
38.
MooiESarstedtM (2011) A Concise Guide to Market Research, Berlin: Springer.
39.
PengMW (2003) Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review28: 275–296.
40.
PetersenFThorndahlJ (2014) Danske vindmøller til havs. Erhvervshistorisk Årbog63: 90–126.
41.
PoracJFThomasHWilsonF (1995) Rivalry and the Industry Model of Scottish knitwear producers. Administrative Science Quarterly40: 203–227.
42.
PorterME (2008) On Competiton, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing Company.
SnowCCThomasJB (1994) Field research methods in strategic management: Contributions to theory building and testing. Journal of Management Studies31(4): 457–480.
45.
StakeRE (2005) Multiple Case Study Analysis, New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
46.
SuárezFFUtterbackJM (1995) Dominant designs and the survival of firms. Strategic Management Journal16: 415–430.
47.
Ter WalALJBoschmaR (2011) Co-evolution of firms, industries and network in space. Regional Studies45: 919–933.
48.
VergneJPDurandR (2010) The missing link between the theory and empirics of path dependence: Conceptual clarification, testability issue, and methodological implications. Journal of Management Studies47: 736–759.
49.
YinRK (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
