As complex challenges like climate change and inequality become increasingly salient, eco-social policies are emerging as suitable public policy instruments to pursue integrated environmental and social objectives. However, despite their rising relevance, a descriptive – and hence empirically applicable – definition is still lacking in the reference literature, currently dominated by normative studies. Therefore, building on a critical assessment of the state of the art, this article proposes a framework for conceptualising eco-social policies, calling for an output-based definition with policy integration as its core element. The article also proposes a typology to differentiate various eco-social policies along two dimensions: the direction of policy integration and the link to economic growth. This typology allows us to elaborate on the possible roles that the welfare state can play vis-à-vis environmental challenges and policies, for instance in the context of decarbonisation: reactive or preventive; protection- or investment-oriented.
AsaraVOteroIDemariaFet al. (2015) Socially sustainable degrowth as a social–ecological transformation: repoliticizing sustainability. Sustainability Science10(3): 375–384.
2.
BohnenbergerK (2020) Money, vouchers, public infrastructures? A framework for sustainable welfare benefits. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland)12(2): 596.
3.
BrandlJZielinskaI (2020) Reviewing the Smart City Vienna Framework Strategy’s potential as an eco-social policy in the context of quality of work and socio-ecological transformation. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland)12(3): 859.
4.
BüchsM (2021) Sustainable welfare: How do universal basic income and universal basic services compare?Ecological Economics189. Epub 22 July. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoecon.2021.107152. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092180092100210X (accessed 1 September 2022).
5.
BüchsMBardsleyNDuweS (2011) Who bears the brunt? Distributional effects of climate change mitigation policies. Critical Social Policy31(2): 285–307.
6.
BüchsMKochM (2019) Challenges for the degrowth transition: The debate about wellbeing. Futures: The Journal of Policy, Planning and Futures Studies105: 155–165.
7.
CandelJJL (2017) Holy Grail or inflated expectations? The success and failure of integrated policy strategies. Policy Studies38(6): 519–552.
8.
DryzekJ (2013) The Politics of the Earth. Environmental Discourses. 3rd edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
DuitAFeindtPHMeadowcroftJ (2015) Greening Leviathan: The rise of the environmental state?Environmental Politics25(1): 1–23.
10.
EkinsP (1993) ‘Limits to growth’ and ‘sustainable development’: Grappling with ecological realities. Ecological Economics8(3): 269–288.
11.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. New York, NY: Polity Press.
12.
European Commission (2019) The European Green Deal. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2019) 640 final, 11 December 2019, Brussels.
FitzpatrickTCahillM (eds) (2002) Environment and Welfare: Towards a Green Social Policy. Hampshire, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
FletcherRRammeltC (2017) Decoupling: A key fantasy of the post-2015 sustainable development agenda. Globalizations14(3): 450–467.
16.
GalgócziB (2019) Phasing out coal: A just transition approach. Working Paper 2019.04. Brussels: ETUI.
17.
González-EguinoM (2015) Energy poverty: An overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews47(C): 377–385.
18.
GoughI (2011) Climate Change and Public Policy Futures. London: British Academy.
19.
GoughI (2015) Climate change and sustainable welfare: The centrality of human needs. Cambridge Journal of Economics39(5): 1191–1214.
20.
GoughI (2016) Welfare states and environmental states: A comparative analysis. Environmental Politics25(1): 1–24.
21.
GoughI (2017) Heat, Greed and Human Need: Climate Change, Capitalism and Sustainable Wellbeing.1st edn. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
22.
GoughI (2019) Necessities and luxuries: How to combine redistribution with sustainable consumption. In: MeadowcroftJBanisterDHoldenEet al. (eds) What Next for Sustainable Development? Our Common Future at Thirty. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 138–158.
23.
GoughIMeadowcroftJDryzekJet al. (2008) JESP symposium: Climate change and social policy. Journal of European Social Policy18(4): 325–344.
24.
GranagliaE (2012) Trade-off. In: BesussiA (ed.) A Companion to Political Philosophy: Methods, Tools, Topics. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, pp. 123–133.
25.
GugushviliDOttoA (2021) Determinants of public support for eco-social policies: A comparative theoretical framework. Social Policy and Society. Epub ahead of print 15 September 2021. DOI: 10.1017/S1474746421000348.
26.
HeffronRJMcCauleyD (2018) What is the “just transition”?Geoforum88: 74–77.
27.
HelneTSalonenAO (2016) Ecosocial food policy: Improving human, animal and planetary well-being. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy12(2): 1–11.
28.
HirvilammiTHelneT (2014) Changing paradigms: A sketch for sustainable wellbeing and ecosocial policy. Sustainability6(4): 2160–2175.
International Labour Organisation (2015) Guidelines for a Just Transition Towards Environmentally Sustainable Economies and Societies for all. Geneva: International Labour Organisation.
31.
IPCC (2021) Summary for policymakers. In: Masson-DelmotteVPZhaiAPiraniSLet al. (eds) Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–34.
32.
JahnD (2014) The three worlds of environmental politics. In: DuitA (ed.) State and Environment: The Comparative Study of Environmental Governance. Boston, MA: MIT Press, pp. 81–110.
33.
JohnsonDLAmbroseSHBassettTJet al. (1997) Meanings of environmental terms. Journal of Environmental Quality26(3): 581–589.
34.
KhanJHildingssonRGartingL (2020) Sustainable welfare in Swedish cities: Challenges of eco-social integration in urban sustainability governance. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland)12(1): 383.
35.
KlarinT (2018) The concept of sustainable development: From its beginning to the contemporary issues. Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business21(1): 67–94.
36.
KochMFritzM (2014a) Building the eco-social state: Do welfare regimes matter?Journal of Social Policy43(4): 679–703.
37.
KochMFritzM (2014b) Potentials for prosperity without growth: Ecological sustainability, social inclusion and the quality of life in 38 countries. Ecological Economics108(2014): 191–199.
38.
KochMGullbergATSchoyenMAet al. (2016) Sustainable welfare in the EU: Promoting synergies between climate and social policies. Critical Social Policy36(4): 704–715.
39.
KoehlerG (2016) Assessing the SDGs from the standpoint of eco-social policy: Using the SDGs subversively. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy32(2): 149–164.
40.
LaurentE (2015) Social-Ecology: Exploring the missing link in sustainable development. Documents de Travail de l’OFCE, n. 2015-07. Paris: Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques.
41.
LaurentEJouzelJ (2018) The Well-Being Transition: Measuring What Counts to Protect What Matters. Sciences Po publications, n. 35. Paris: Sciences Po.
42.
LaurentEPochetP (2015) Towards a Social-Ecological Transition. Solidarity in the Age of Environmental Challenge. Brussels: ETUI.
43.
McGannMMurphyM (2021) Income Support in an Eco-Social State: The Case for Participation Income. Social Policy and Society. Epub ahead of print 21 September 2021. DOI: 10.1017/S1474746421000397.
44.
MandelliMSabatoSJessoulaM (2021) EU economic governance and the socio ecological transition: Towards a more sustainable European Semester?Politiche Sociali 3/2021: 619–638.
45.
MatthiesA-L (2017) The conceptualisation of ecosocial transition. In: MatthiesA-LNärhiK (eds) The Ecosocial Transition of Societies: The Contribution of Social Work and Social Policy. London: Routledge, pp. 17–35.
46.
MeadowcroftJ (2005) From welfare state to ecostate. In: BarryJEckersleyR (eds) The State and the Global Ecological Crisis. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 3–23.
47.
MeadowsDHMeadowsDLRandersJet al. (1972) The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York, NY: Universe Books.
48.
MorelNPalierBPalmeJ (2012) Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges. Bristol: Policy Press.
49.
O’ConnorM (2007) The ‘Four Spheres’ framework for sustainability. Ecological Complex3(4): 285–292.
50.
PradhanPCostaLRybskiDet al. (2017) A systematic study of sustainable development goal (SDG) interaction. Earth’s Future5(11): 1169–1179.
51.
PurvisBMaoYRobinsonD (2019) Three pillars of sustainability: In search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science14(3): 681–695.
52.
RaworthK (2017) Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st Century Economist. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
53.
RaynerJHowlettM (2009) Introduction: Understanding integrated policy strategies and their evolution. Policy and Society28(2): 99–109.
54.
RidleyM (2010) The Rational Optimist: How Prosperity Evolves. London: Fourth Estate.
55.
RockströmJSteffenWNooneKet al. (2009) Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society14(2): 32.
56.
SabatoSMandelliM (2018) The EU’s potential for promoting an eco-social agenda. Report prepared for the project ‘Sustainable welfare societies: Assessing linkages between social and environmental policies’. Oslo; Brussels: NOVA Norwegian Social Research, European Social Observatory.
57.
SchneiderFKallisGMartinez-AlierJ (2010) Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production18(6): 511–518.
58.
SchoyenMHvindenBDotterud LeirenM (eds) (2022) Towards Sustainable Welfare States in Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
59.
SchweikertAEspinetXChinowskyP (2018) The triple bottom line: Bringing a sustainability framework to prioritize climate change investments for infrastructure planning. Sustainability Science13(2): 377–391.
60.
SovacoolBKHessDJCantoniR (2021) Energy transitions from the cradle to the grave: A meta-theoretical framework integrating responsible innovation, social practices, and energy justice. Energy Research & Social Science 75. Epub 26 March. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102027. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214629621001201 (accessed 1 September 2022).
61.
StevisDMorenaEKrauseD (2020) Introduction: The genealogy and contemporary politics of just transitions. In: MorenaEKrauseDStevisD (eds) Just Transitions: Social Justice in the Shift Towards a Low-Carbon World. London: Pluto Press, pp. 1–31.
62.
TreinPMeyerIMaggettiM (2019) The integration and coordination of public policies: A systematic comparative review. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice21(4): 332–349.
63.
United Nations (1987) Our common future. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. New York, NY: United Nations.
64.
United Nations (2015) Paris Agreement. New York, NY: United Nations.
65.
UršičMDeželanTMaksutiA (2014) The potentials of normative sustainability. An analysis of sustainable development strategies on global, supranational and national levels. European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities3(2): 34–49.
66.
WalkerG (2012) Environmental Justice: Concepts, Evidence, and Politics. London: Routledge.
