Right-wing populist approaches to employment and social policy have become increasingly prevalent in recent years; such ideas stigmatise ‘others’ such as immigrants and the unemployed, while advocating the transfer of resources to favoured groups. In this article, based on a study of Poland and the United Kingdom, we contend that such developments are indicative of illiberal forms of dualisation and assess the relationship of trade unions with these processes. In conclusion, we discuss ways in which future investigations might develop more understanding of this concept.
AlesinaAGlaeserESacerdoteB (2001) Why doesn’t the US have a European-style welfare system?Brookings Papers on Economic Activity2: 187–254.
2.
AmableB (2014) Who wants the contrat de travail unique? Social support for labor market flexibilization in France. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society53(4): 636–662.
3.
AndersenJG (1992) Denmark: The Progress Party - populist neo-liberalism and welfare state chauvinism. In: HainsworthP (ed.) The Extreme Right in Europe and the USA. London: Pinter, pp. 193–205.
4.
BantingKKymlickaW (2004) Do multiculturalism policies erode the welfare state? In: Van ParijsP (ed.) Cultural Diversity versus Economic Solidarity. Brussels: De Boeck, pp. 227–284.
5.
BohleDGreskovitsB (2012) Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
6.
CBOS (2016) Komunikat z badań CBOS nr 140/2016, Opinie o obniżeniu wieku emerytalnego. Warsaw: CBOS, p. 3.
DudekA (2013) Historia polityczna Polski 1989–2012. Krakow: Znak.
9.
EmmeneggerP (2009) Barriers to entry: Insider/Outsider politics and the determinants of job security regulations. Journal of European Social Policy19(2): 131–146.
10.
EmmeneggerPHäusermannSPalierB. (2012) How we grow unequal. In: EmmeneggerPHäusermannSPalierBSeeleib-KaiserM (eds) The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–26.
11.
Esping-AndersenGReginiM (2000) Why Deregulate Labour Markets?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
FordRGoodwinM (2017) A nation divided. Journal of Democracy28(1): 17–30.
13.
FuchsC (2016) Neoliberalism in Britain: From Thatcherism to Cameronism. Triple C: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society14(1): 163–188.
14.
GoodhartD (2004) Too diverse?Prospect95(30): 7.
15.
GrimshawD (2015) Britain’s social model: Rapid descent from ‘liberal collectivism’ to a ‘market society’. In: Vaughan-WhiteheadD (ed.) The European Social Model in Times of Economic Crisis and Austerity. Cheltenham and Geneva: Edward Elgar and ILO, pp. 553–613.
16.
KriesiHPappasTS (eds) (2015) European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession. Colchester: ECPR Press.
17.
LindbeckASnowerDJ (1987) Efficiency wages versus insiders and outsiders. European Economic Review31(1–2): 407–416.
18.
MacLeavyJ (2011) A ‘new politics’ of austerity, workfare and gender? The UK coalition government’s welfare reform proposals. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society4(3): 355–367.
PalierBThelenK (2010) Institutionalizing dualism: Complementarities and change in France and Germany. Politics & Society38(1): 119–148.
22.
PearceN (2004) Diversity versus solidarity: A new progressive dilemma. Renewal, A Journal of Labour Politics12(3): 79–87.
23.
ReedAJr (2013) Marx, race, and neoliberalism. New Labor Forum22(1): 49–57.
24.
RuedaD (2007) Social Democracy Inside Out: Partisanship and Labour Market Policy in Advanced Industrialized Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van der WaalJAchterbergPHoutmanD. (2010) ‘Some are more equal than others’: Economic egalitarianism and welfare chauvinism in the Netherlands. Journal of European Social Policy20(4): 350–363.
31.
Van Der WaalJDe KosterWVan OorschotW (2013) Three worlds of welfare chauvinism? How welfare regimes affect support for distributing welfare to immigrants in Europe. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice15(2): 164–181.
