The recent financial crisis has once again highlighted the precarious situation of trade unions: austerity measures have targeted unions’ traditional institutional ally, the welfare state, as well as their last organizational stronghold, the public sector. The purpose of this article is to examine how trade unions have responded to reductions in welfare provision, due either to reform or to state inaction, and how state retrenchment can provide a silver lining for unions via the enhancement of unions’ bargaining responsibilities. We argue that, apart from retrenchment and privatization, there is a third road to welfare reform which involves unions’ ‘collectivization’ of social risks through the take-up of marginalized policies in bargaining agreements. Presenting evidence from a most-likely (the Netherlands) and least-likely (Greece) case, we identify instances where unions have acted as pivotal political substitutes to the state in the realm of welfare provision.
BonoliG (2007) Time Matters. Postindustrialization, New Social Risks, and Welfare State Adaptation in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Comparative Political Studies40(5): 495–520.
3.
CellaG (2012) The representation of non-standard workers. Theory and culture of collective bargaining. Transfer18(2): 171–184
4.
ClaytonRPontussonJ (1998) Welfare-State Retrenchment Revisited: Entitlement Cuts, Public Sector Restructuring, and Inegalitarian Trends in Advanced Capitalist Societies. World Politics51(1): 67–98.
5.
CoxR (2001) The Social Construction of an Imperative: Why Welfare Reform happened in Denmark and the Netherlands and Not in Germany. World Politics53(3): 463–498.
6.
CrouchC (2000) The Snakes and Ladders of Twenty-First-Century Trade Unionism. Oxford Review of Economic Policy16(1): 70–83.
7.
DemetriadesS (2002) The role of the social partners in vocational training. The International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations18(3): 281–298.
8.
EbbinghausBHasselA (2000) Striking deals: concertation in the reform of continental European welfare states. Journal of European Public Policy7(1): 44–62.
9.
EIRR (1995) Netherlands: the 1994 bargaining round. European Industrial Relations ReviewNo. 250.
10.
FlandersA (1970) Management and Unions. London: Faber and Faber.
11.
GrugulisI (2009) Training and Development. In: RedmanTWilkinsonA (eds) Contemporary Human Resource Management: Text and Cases. FT/Prentice Hall, pp.117–137.
12.
HackerJ (2004) Privatizing Risk without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States. American Political Science Review98(2): 243–260.
13.
HemerijckA (1995) Corporatist immobility in the Netherlands. In: CrouchCTraxlerF (eds) Organized Industrial Relations in Europe: What Future?Aldershot/Avebury: Ashgate, pp.183–226.
14.
HemerijckA (2003) A paradoxical miracle: The politics of coalition government and social concertation in Dutch welfare reform. In: JochemSSiegelNA (eds) Konzertierung, Verhandlungsdemokratie und Reformpolitik im Wohlfahrtsstaat. Opladen: Leske + Budrich, pp.232–266.
HymanR (2004) Varieties of Capitalism, National Industrial Relations Systems and Transnational Challenges. In: HarzingAWvan RuysseveldtJ (eds) International Human Resource Management. London: Sage, pp.411–432.
17.
JohnstonAKornelakisARodriguez d’AcriC (2011) Social partners and the welfare state: Recalibration, privatization or collectivization of social risks?European Journal of Industrial Relations17(4): 349–364.
18.
MarshallTH (1950/1992) Citizenship and Social Class. London: Pluto Press.
19.
PiersonP (2001) The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
ReginiMRegaliaI (1997) Employers, unions and the state: The resurgence of concertation in Italy?West European Politics20(1): 210–230.
21.
RhodesM (2001) The Political Economy of Social Pacts: ‘Competitive Corporatism’ and European welfare reform. In: PiersonP (ed.) The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.165–195.
22.
RothsteinB (1992) Labor market institutions and working-class strength. In: SteinmoSThelenKLongstrethF (eds) Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.33–56.
23.
ScruggsLAllanJ (2004) Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies. American Journal of Political Science48(3): 496–512.
24.
SilviaS (1997) German Unification and Emerging Divisions within German Employers’ Associations. Cause or Catalyst?Comparative Politics29(2): 187–208.
25.
SimmsMCharlwoodA (2010) Trade Unions: Power and Influence in a Changed Context. In: CollingTTerryM (eds) Industrial Relations: Theory and Practice. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp.125–148.
26.
SoskiceD (1993) Social Skills from Mass Higher Education: Rethinking the Company-based Initial Training Paradigm. Oxford Review of Economic Policy9(3): 101–113.
27.
SpencerD (2009) The Political Economy of Work. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
28.
StreeckWSchmitterP (1985) Community, market, state – and associations?European Sociological Review1(2): 119–138.
29.
TrampuschC (2007a) Industrial Relations as a Source of Social Policy: A Typology of the Institutional Conditions for Industrial Agreements on Social Benefits. Social Policy & Administration41(3): 251–270.
30.
TrampuschC (2007b) Industrial Relations as a Source of Solidarity in Times of Welfare State Retrenchment. Journal of Social Policy36(2): 197–215.
31.
VisserJ (2012) The rise and fall of industrial unionism. Transfer18(2): 129–141.
32.
YerkesMTijdensK (2010) Social risk protection in collective agreements: Evidence from the Netherlands. European Journal of Industrial Relations16(4): 369–383.
