Trade union legitimacy at national level is increasingly coming under pressure due to the new social challenges arising from the shifting of decision making from national to both international and decentralised levels. In this article we discuss representative opinion research on the social differences perceived by Dutch citizens and the priorities on which trade unions should focus. This allows us to relate the emerging criticisms of the unbalanced composition of Dutch trade union membership to issues of ‘positive’ coordination and policy-making legitimacy in light of internal trade union democracy and the representation of younger labour market cohorts.
BaccaroL. (2001) ‘Union democracy revisited: decision-making procedures in the Italian labour movement’, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 22 (2), 183201.
2.
BaccaroL. (2006) ‘Civil society meets the state: towards associational democracy’, Socio-Economic Review, 4 (2), 185208.
3.
CrouchC. (1983) ‘Pluralism and the new corporatism: a rejoinder’, Political Studies, 31 (3), 452460.
4.
DølvikJ. E. (1997) Redrawing the boundaries of solidarity?, Oslo: Arena/FAFO.
5.
GrapperhausF. B. J. (2002) ‘De wenselijkheid van een nieuwe regeling voor de ver-houding van niet-gebonden werknemers tot een CAO’, Sociaal Recht, 6, 184.
6.
KlandermansP. G., and VisserJ. (1995) De vakbeweging na de welvaartsstaat, Assen: van Gorcum.
7.
LaxD. A., and SebeniusJ. K. (1985) ‘The power of alternatives or the limits to negotiation’, Negotiation Journal, 1 (2), 163179.
8.
Quality of Life in Europe (2004) First European Quality of Life Survey 2003, Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
9.
ScharpfF. W. (1997) Games real actors play. Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research, Boulder Co.: Westview.
10.
ScharpfF. W. (1999) Governing in Europe: effective and democratic?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
SchmitterP. (1974) ‘Still the century of corporatism?’, Review of Politics, 36 (1), 85111.
12.
SCP (Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau) (2007) De sociale staat van Nederland 2007, Den Haag: SCP.
13.
StreeckW., and SchmitterP. C. (1999) ‘The organisation of business interests: studying the associative action of business in advanced industrial societies, MPIfG Discussion Paper, No 99/1.
14.
StreeckW., and VisserJ. (1997) ‘The rise of the conglomerate union’, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 3 (3), 30532.
Van der MeerM., and VisserJ. (2005) ‘Shifting positions and hidden resources - the tortuous negotiation of the Autumn Agreement of 2004 in the Netherlands’, New Governance Project, The Emergence and Evolution of Social Pacts - Country Papers, Florence: European University Institute.
17.
Van der MeerM., VisserJ. and WilthagenT. (2005) ‘Adaptive and reflexive governance: the limits of organised decentralisation’, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 11 (3), 347365.
18.
Van de VallM. (1970) Labor organizations: A macro- and micro-sociological analysis on a comparative basis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Van OorschotW. (2006) ‘Making the difference in social Europe: deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states’, Journal of European Social Policy, 16 (1), 2342.
20.
VisserJ. (2000) ‘The Netherlands’, in EbbinghausB., and VisserJ. (eds.) Trade unions in Western Europe since 1945, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 429510.
21.
VisserJ., and HemerijckA. (1997) A Dutch miracle? Job growth, welfare reform and corporatism in the Netherlands, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
22.
VisserJ., and WiltsA. (2006) ‘Reaching out and fitting in: Dutch business associations at home (and) in Europe’, in StreeckW., GroteJ., SchneiderV. and VisserJ. (eds.) Governing interests. Business associations facing internationalization, London: Routledge,2148.
23.
WRR (2006) De verzorgingsstaat herwogen. Over verzorgen, verzekeren, verheffen en verbinden, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
