This article deals with the impact of foreign direct investment (FDI) on transformation processes in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). Our specific interest is in the effects of FDI on the organisation of work and labour relations at the enterprise level; in a more general sense we are concerned with the contribution of FDI to the creation of the microeconomic foundation essential to functioning market economies. We hold that there is a discernible process of selective harmonisation taking place between outside influences and existing domestic factors. In this context we postulate that the importance of FDI is further enhanced by the fact that it influences a broad array of societal transformation processes beyond the enterprise itself, thus contributing to a process which could develop into what we have labelled a European-style environment. Admittedly, the outcome can as yet only be rudimentarily defined, especially since a European-style environment, as a point of reference, is itself currently undergoing continuous change. But we hypothesise that it will be a process which reflects to varying degrees both the endogenous and exogenous sources of its making.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baethge, M. and Wolf, H. ( 1995) 'Continuity and change in the German model of industrial relations', in Locke, R., Kochran, T. and Piore, M. (eds.) Employment Relations in a Changing World, Cambridge/London, pp. 231-262.
2.
Bangert, D. and Poór, J. ( 1993) 'Foreign involvement in the Hungarian economy: its impact on human resource management', The International Journal of Human Resource Management, December 1993, pp. 817-840.
3.
Blanchard, O. et al. (1991) Reform in Eastern Europe, Cambridge, Mass.1991.
4.
Bluhm, K. ( 2000) 'East-West Integration and the Changing German Production Regime: A Firm-Centered Approach', Presentation at the Conference of Europeanists of the Council of European Studies. Chicago. March 30 - April 01.
5.
Boda, D. ( 1996) Tulajdonnal megerõsített munkavállalói poziciók. (Employee positions reinforced by ownership), Külgazdaság, 4.
6.
Bódis, L. ( 1997) 'Privatizáció, munkaszervezet és bérelosztási mechanizmusok egy nagyüzemi varrodában. I-II. [Privatization, work organisation and wage distributing mechanisms in the large sewing enterprise]', in Közgazdasági Szemle, No.8 és No.9.
7.
Bohle, D. ( 2000) 'Internationalisation - an issue neglected in path dependency approach to post communist transformation', in Dobry, M. (ed.) Democratic and capitalist transitions in Eastern Europe: Lessons for Social Sciences. Dordrecht, forthcoming
8.
Boyer, R. ( 1998) 'Hybridisation and models of production. geography, history and theory', in Boyer, R. et al. (eds.) (1998), pp. 23-56.
9.
Boyer, R. et al. (eds.) (1998) Between Imitation and Innovation. The Transfer and Hybridisation of Productive Models in the International Automobile Industry, Oxford.
10.
Burawoy, M. ( 1992) 'A view from production: The Hungarian transition from socialism to capitalism', in Smith, C. and Thompson, P. (eds.), Labour in Transition The Labour Process in Eastern Europe and China , London: Routledge, pp.180-200.
11.
Crozier, M. and Friedberg, E. ( 1979) Macht und Organisation. Die Zwänge kollektiven Handelns, Königstein/Ts.
12.
CSO (1997) Central Statistical Office, Statistical Yearbook 1996, Budapest.
13.
Desfosses, L.R. ( 1995) 'Stratégiaváltás az Ikarusz-nál - amerikai szemmel (Strategy Change at Ikarus)'Vezetéstudomány . 1995, 2, pp. 14-19.
14.
Dörrenbächer, C. et al (1995) Die Top 500 deutschen Tochter- und Beteiligungsgesellschaften in den Visegradländern. Berlin.
15.
Dörrenbächer, C. ( 1999) Between Global Market Constraints and National Dependencies. The Internationalisation of the World Leading Telecommunication Equipment Manufacturers 1980-1995, Paper for the ESRI Workshop: Economic Actors, National Systems and International Contexts , Copenhagen, 21-24.9.99.
16.
Dunning, J.H. ( 1979) 'Explaining patterns of international production: In defense of the eclectic theory', Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, pp. 269-295.
17.
Dunning, J.H. ( 1993) Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy , Wokingham et al.
18.
Durand, J.P et. al (eds.) (1999) L'Avenir de travail ou choice. Une comparison dans l'industrie automobile, Paris.
19.
Fligstein, N. ( 1990) The Transformation of Corporate Control, Cambridge, Mass
20.
Frege, C. and Tóth, A. ( 1999) 'Institutions matter: union solidarity in Hungary and East Germany', British Journal of Industrial Relations , Vol. 37, No.1, March, pp. 117-140.
21.
Girndt, R. ( 1995) 'Hungary's trade unions: division and decline' , Labour Focus on Eastern Europe, No. 55, Autumn, pp. 47-59.
22.
Haraszti, M. ( 1989 [1979]) Darabbér.Egy munkás a munkásállamban [Piece-wage. A Worker in a Worker's State] , Budapest, Téka K.
23.
Héthy, L. and Makó, Cs. ( 1978) Munkások, Érdekek, Érdekegyeztetés (Workers, Interests, Interest Reconciliation), Budapest .
24.
Héthy, L. and Makó, Cs. ( 1972) Munkásmagatartások és a gazdasági szervezet (Workers' Behaviour and Economic Organisation), Budapest.
25.
Hu, Y. ( 1995) 'The international transferability of the firm's advantage' , California Management Review, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 73-88.
26.
Janky B. ( 1996) 'Övé a gyár - magadnak épited! (His is the factory - you're building it for yourself!)', in Szociológiai Szemle3-4, pp 223-248.
27.
Jürgens, U. and Naschold, F. ( 1994) 'Arbeits- und industriepolitische Entwicklungsengpässe der deutschen Industrie in den 90er Jahren', in Zapf, W. and Dierkes, M. (eds.) Institutionendynmaik und Institionenvergleich (WZB Jahrbuch 1994), Berlin, pp. 239-270.
28.
Katzenstein, PJ. (1989) (ed.) Industry and Politics in West Germany, Ithaca/London.
29.
Kemény, I. ( 1985) Ouvriers hongrois. Paris.
30.
Kern, H. and Sabel, C. ( 1994) 'Verblaßte Tugenden: Zur Krise des deutschen Produktionsmodels' , in Beckenbach, N. and van Teeck, W (eds.) Umbrüche gesellschaftlicher Arbeit, Göttingen, pp. 605-624.
31.
Keune, M. and Tóth, A. ( 2000) The role of foreign investment in regional development in North-West Hungary. Paper for the conference 'Local Development in Central and Eastern Europe', 15-16 June 2000, Department of Economics, University ofAncona.
32.
Könözsy. L. ( 1995) Az 1993. és 1995. évi ÜT. választások eredményeinek összesítése konföderációk szerint. Kézirat. Érdekvédelmi Tanácsadó Szolgálat.
33.
Kurz, C. / Wittke, V. ( 1998) 'Using industrial capacities as a way of integrating the Central and East European Economies', in Zysman, J. / Schwartz, A. (eds.), Enlarging Europe: the industrial foundations of a new political reality , Research Series99 , Berkeley , pp. 63 - 95.
34.
Lipset, S.M. ( 1959) 'Some social requisites of democracy: economic development and political legitimacy', American Political Science Review , Vol. 53, reprinted in Lipset, S.M. ( 1980) Political Man, Baltimore, pp. 459-476.
35.
Moore, B. ( 1966) Soziale Ursprünge von Diktatur und Demokratie, Frankfurt .
36.
Murrell, P. ( 1992) 'Evolution in economics and in the economic reform of the centrally planned economies', in Clague, C. and Rausser, G.C. (eds.) The Emergence of Market Economies in Eastern Europe, Oxford, pp. 35-54.
37.
Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. ( 1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge/London .
38.
Neumann, L. ( 1997) 'Circumventing trade unions in Hungary: old and new channels of wage bargaining', European Journal of Industrial Relations , Vol. 3., No. 2.
39.
Neumann, L. ( 1998) Towards a more consolidated collective bargaining in Hungary. (The case of electricity industry), SASE Conference , Vienna.
40.
Neumann, L. ( 2000) Decentralized Collective Bargaining in Hungary , International Journal of Labour Law and Industrial Relations , Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 113-128.
41.
Nielsen, K., Jessop, B. and Hausner, J. ( 1995) 'Introduction', in Hausner, J., Jessop, B. and Nielsen, K. (eds.) Strategic Choice and Path Dependency in Post Socialism. Institutional Dynamism in the Transformation Process, Aldershot, pp. 3-46.
42.
North, D. ( 1990) Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, Cambridge, Mass.
43.
O'Donnell, G. and Schmitter, Ph. ( 1986) Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies, Baltimore.
Prugberger, T. and Ploetz, M. ( 1992) Összehasonlitó munkajog. A magyar munkajog reformja az európai államok jogi szabályozása tükrében (Comparative Labour Law. The Reform of the Hungarian Labour Law in the context of the European Member States' Practices), Bonn .
46.
Ruigrok, W. and van Tulder, R. ( 1995) The Logic of International Restructuring, London/New York.
47.
Sachs, J. ( 1993) Poland's Jump to the Market Economy, Cambridge, Mass.
48.
Sally, R. ( 1995) States and Firms. Multinational Enterprises in Institutional Competition, London.
49.
Schlecht, O. ( 1994) 'Soziale Marktwirtschaft für das ganze Europa' , in Herrmann-Pillath, C., Schlecht, O. and Wünsche, H.F. (eds.) Marktwirtschaft als Aufgabe, Stuttgart et al., pp. 789-803.
50.
Somorai, L. ( 1994) 'Az 1993. évi üzemi, közalkalmazotti tanács választások' in.: Kurtán, S.-Sándor, P.-Vass, L. (eds.) Magyarország Politikai Évkönyve 1994. Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány: Budapest. pp.188-198.
51.
Soskice, D. ( 1997) 'Technologiepolitik, Innovation und nationale Institutionengefüge in Deutschland', in Naschold, F. et al. (eds.) Ökonomische Leistungsfähigkeit und institutionelle Innovation (WZB Jahrbuch 1997), Berlin, pp. 319-348.
52.
Stark, D. ( 1992) 'Path Dependence and Privatization Strategies in East Central Europe', East European Politics and Societies , Vol.6, No.1.Winter.
53.
Streeck, W. ( 1995) 'German Capitalism: Does it Exist? Can it Survive?' , MPIfG Discussion Paper 95/5, November, Cologne .
54.
Thompson, P. and Smith, C. ( 1992) 'Socialism and the labour process in theory and practice' , in Smith, C. and Thompson, P. (eds.) Labour in Transition The Labour Process in Eastern Europe and China, London: Routledge, pp.3-36.
55.
Tóth, A. ( 1996a) 'Suzuki in Ungarn: Depression statt Kompromißsuche' , in Deppe, R. and Tatur, M.Ökonomische Transformation und gewerkschaftliche Umbruchprozesse in Polen und Ungarn auf Branchenebene, Schriftenreihe Hans-Böckler Stiftung, pp. 171-207.
56.
Tóth, A. ( 1996b) 'GM-Hungary: Eine Gewerkschaft in der Zwickmühle zwischen Management und Betriebsrat', in Deppe, R. and Tatur, M.Ökonomische Transformation und gewerkschaftliche Umbruchprozesse in Polen und Ungarn auf Branchenebene, Schriftenreihe Hans-Böckler Stiftung, pp. 208-241.
57.
Tóth, A. ( 1997) 'Works councils invented in Hungary', European Journal of Industrial Relations. 1997 July, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 161-182.
58.
Tóth, A. ( 1999) The Audi Hungária Kft., Background paper for ILO/MULTI .
59.
Tóth, A. ( 2000) 'Hungary: Attempts to reform a workers' movement - without a mass workers' movement', in Hoffman, R. /Waddington, J. (eds.) Trade Union Reform in Europe, Brussels.
60.
Tóth, G. ( 1995) Tájékoztató a középszintö valamint a gazdálkodó szerveknél kötött megállapodásokról (Information about the Multi-Employer Collective Agreements), Mimeo, Készült az ÉT Információs Bizottsága Számára .
61.
Unctad (1996) World Investment Report 1996. Investment, Trade and International Policy Arrangements, New York/Geneva.
62.
Unctad (1999) World Investment Report 1999. FDI and the Challenge of Development, New York /Geneva.
63.
Voszka, É. ( 1997) A dinoszauruszok esélyei: nagyvállalati szerkezetváltás és privatizáció. [Chances of dinosaurs: restructuring and privatisation of large enterprises]Pénzügykutató Rt., Budapest.
64.
Whitley, R. and Czaban, L. ( 1998) 'Ownership, control and authority in emergent capitalism: changing supervisory relations in Hungarian industry', The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9:1, February 1998, pp. 99-115.
65.
Womack, J.P. et. al. (1990) The Machine that Changed the World, New York .
66.
Wortmann, M. ( 2000) 'What is new about "global" MNCs?', in WZB Discussion Paper (forthcoming), Berlin .
67.
Zysman, J. and Schwartz, A. ( 1998) 'Enlarging Europe: The industrial foundation of a new political reality', in Zysman, J. and Schwartz, A.Enlarging Europe: The Industrial Foundation of a New Political Reality, pp. 1-24.
