This review critically scrutinizes recent advancements in ceramic shaping and forming technologies, emphasizing their impact on the reliability and cost-effectiveness of advanced ceramics. Notably, the shift from traditional dry processing to innovative suspension wet techniques has enabled the fabrication of complex geometries, significantly expanding the potential applications of ceramics. Key methods, including aqueous injection molding, gelcasting, direct coagulation, freeze gelcasting, and geopolymer production, are analyzed for their effectiveness in producing near-net-shape porous and dense structures. Unlike existing reviews, this article not only outlines the latest trends but also provides a comparative analysis of the strengths and limitations of each technique, elucidating how these methods can meet evolving industry demands. By highlighting practical implications and offering insights into future directions, this review contributes a novel perspective on the optimization of ceramic manufacturing processes.
DatlaSRAllaRKAlluriVR, et al.Dental ceramics: part II-recent advances in dental ceramics. Am J Mater Eng Technol2015; 3: 19–26.
2.
SultanZKSheikhZSauroS. Dental materials (principles and applications. Paramount Book Publishers, May 2018.
3.
HallmannLGerngrossMD. Antibacterial ceramics for dental applications. Appl Sci2025; 15: 4553.
4.
LiM. Advancements in GelMA/ceramic composites for dental applications: integration with portable 4D bioprinting technologies. Int J Biol Macromol2025; 143993.
5.
Time Series Annual Survey of Manufactures: Statistics for Industry Groups and Industries, Data provided by United States Census Bureau, 2024.
6.
OtitojuTAOkoyePUChenG, et al.Advanced ceramic components: materials, fabrication, and applications. J Ind Eng Chem2020; 85: 34–65.
7.
MichaelisAScheithauerUMoritzT, et al.Advanced manufacturing for advanced ceramics. Procedia CIRP2020; 95: 18–22.
8.
LenkaRKPatroPKMahataT. Handbook on synthesis strategies for advanced materials. In Shape Forming and Sintering of Ceramics. Springer, 2022.
9.
NishadSAl-RaoushRI. Colloid retention and mobilization mechanisms under different physicochemical conditions in porous media: a micromodel study. Powder Technol2021; 377: 163–173.
10.
CarterCBNortonMG. Shaping and forming ceramic, materials: science and engineering. CHAPTER PREVIEW2013; 23: 423–437.
11.
ŻurowskiRZygmuntowiczJTomaszewskaJ, et al.Sustainable ZTA composites produced by an advanced centrifugal slip casting method. Ceram Inter2022; 48: 11678–11695.
12.
JorgeH. CIM - Ceramic Injection Moulding Manufacturing technology for advanced ceramic components Conference: Webinar organised by the European Cluster of Ceramics, 2020.
13.
ZhouPPWuGQTaoY, et al.Optimization of the injection molding process for development of high performance calcium oxide -based ceramic cores. Mater Res Express2018; 5: 025208.
14.
MeenaRMaliHSMeenaA, et al.Influence of alumina powder (Al2O3) on mechanical and tribological properties of injection molded polyoxymethylene composites. Mater Today Proc2023. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2023.05.174
15.
TadiSPKoppisettiDPalisettiVKT, et al.Polymer based binder materials for various metal injection molding processes: salient aspects and recent trends. J ManufProcesses2025; 133: 322–353.
16.
GalCWOhJWSongGW, et al.Rheological and thermal debinding behaviors of silicon nitride in powder injection molding. Ceram Inter2019; 45: 16982–16991.
17.
YangJHuangY. Aqueous colloidal injection molding of ceramics (CIMC) based on gelation. In: Novel colloidal forming of ceramics. Singapore: Springer Singapore., 2020, pp.1–16.
18.
LiYShenBYangH, et al.Alumina nanocrystalline ceramic by centrifugal casting. J Eur Ceram Soc2023; 43: 1590–1596.
19.
VicenteRCescaKViana da SilvaAF, et al.Hierarchical membrane by centrifugal casting and effects of incorporating activated carbon as pore-former. J Eur Ceram Soc2023; 43: 3447–3453.
20.
de la RochaMRVirginieMKhodakovA, et al.Preparation of alumina based tubular asymmetric membranes incorporated with coal fly ash by centrifugal casting. Ceram Inter2021; 47: 4187–4196.
21.
ChenANWuJMLiuYX, et al.Fabrication of porous fibrous alumina ceramics by direct coagulation casting combined with 3D printing. Ceram Intern2018; 44: 4845–4852.
22.
XieZPChenYLHuangY. A novel casting forming for ceramics by gelatine and enzyme catalysis. J Euro Ceram Soc2000; 20: 253–257.
23.
BurgerWKerelAStockD, et al. (2000) Direct coagulation casting and gel-casting: two innovative ceramic forming technologies. In MuellerG (ed) EUROMAT'99, ceramics-processing, reliability, tribology and wear. Vol. 12, pp. 274–281.
24.
MoremoRFerrariB. Advanced ceramics via EPD of aqueous slurries. Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull2000; 79: 44–48.
25.
ZhangYXueYLiuY, et al.A novel rapid fabrication method and in-situ densification mechanism for ceramic matrix composite. Compos. B: Eng2025; 288: 111881.
26.
WangBCaiDXueC, et al.Preparation and mechanical properties of laminated B4C–TiB2/BN ceramics. Ceram Intern2021; 47: 31214–31221.
27.
BatiliHHamawandiBErgülA, et al.On the electrophoretic deposition of Bi2Te3 nanoparticles through electrolyte optimization and substrate design. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp2022; 649: 129537.
28.
BabashovVGVarrikNM. Gel casting method for producing ceramic materials: a review. Glass and Ceram2023; 80: 9–16.
29.
YuanLLiuZTianC, et al.Structure and properties of Al2O3-bonded porous fibrous YSZ ceramics fabricated by aqueous gel-casting. Ceram Intern2021; 47: 25408–25415.
30.
LiXLiSYinZ, et al.Chengliang ma, foam-gelcasting preparation and properties of high-strength mullite porous ceramics. Ceram Intern2023; 49: 6873–6879.
31.
PunugupatiGRaoCVeeresh KumarGB. Modeling and Optimization of Gelcast Ceramic Composites. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2021.
32.
HuangYZhangLJingR, et al.Lead zirconate titanate-based ceramics with high piezoelectricity and broad usage temperature range. Chem Eng J2023; 477: 147192.
33.
XuJLiDSongJ, et al.Hydrolysis behavior and mechanism of AlON powders. Mater Design2025; 256: 114338.
34.
WenhaoLXiaoyanZHanlinS, et al.Hydrolysis-induced simultaneous foaming and coagulation casting of secondary aluminum dross aqueous suspension. J Amer Ceram Soc2023; 106: 3364–3374.
35.
DongADuDXingH, et al.Precision Forming Technology of Large Superalloy Castings for Aircraft Engines: Advanced Adjusted Pressure Casting Process, springer link. 2021.
36.
ChenSWangLHeG, et al.Microstructure and properties of porous Si3N4 ceramics by gelcasting-self-propagating high-temperature synthesis (SHS). J Adv Ceram2022; 11: 172–183.
37.
RajuPKhanraABuchi SureshM, et al.Pressure slip cast processing of alumina (Al2O3) products and comparative evaluation of mechanical properties. Adv Appl Ceram2022; 121: 1–11.
38.
LvZLuMXiaoG, et al.A review of near-net shape forming by hot isostatic pressure technology. J Ame Ceram soc2025; 108: e19674.
39.
Alfaro CruzMRGaray-RodríguezLFLuévano-HipólitoE, et al.Sol-gel synthesis of advanced materials and their photocatalytic applications in North America. JSGST2025; 116: 1–36.
40.
ZygmuntowiczJTomaszewskaJJeleńJ, et al.Comprehensive analysis of the microstructure, properties and environmental performance of Al2O3-ZrO2 composites obtained via centrifugal slip casting. Chem Eng Sci2022; 263: 118086.
41.
BuscagliaV. Introduction to functional ceramic materials: Structure: Properties & applications. Power point presentaion, 2025: 1–14.
42.
KalemtasA. Ceramic materials, power point lecture, 2015: 1–19.
43.
KumarA. Design of centrifugal casting experimental setup for fabrication of alumina tube. A thesis in the partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of bachelor of technology. 2013, pp. 1–35.
44.
AssegehegnGBrito-de la FuenteEFrancoJM, et al.The importance of understanding the freezing step and its impact on freeze-drying process performance. J Pharm Sci2019; 108: 1378–1395.
BoulesteixRGoldsteinAPerrièreC, et al.Transparent ceramics green-microstructure optimization by pressure slip-casting: cases of YAG and MgAl2O4. J Eur Ceram Soc2021; 41: 2085–2095.
47.
John Wiley &Sons. Advanced processing and manufacture technologies for nanostructured and multifuncational materials II, Book, Canada, v36 issuse, 2015.
48.
TallonCFranksGV. Recent trends in shape forming from colloidal processing: a review. JcerSJ2011; 119: 147–160.
49.
LiuRXuTWangCA. A review of fabrication strategies and applications of porous ceramics prepared by freeze-casting method. Ceram Inter2016; 42: 2907–2925.
50.
DevilleS. Freeze-Casting of porous ceramics: a review of current achievements and issues. Adv Eng Mate2008; 10: 155–169.
51.
ShaoGHanaorDAHShenX, et al.Freeze casting: from low-dimensional building blocks to aligned porous structures—A review of novel materials, methods, and applications. Advan Mater2020; 32: 1907176.
52.
VaishaliHPSDholuUSharmaS, et al.Effect of freezing systems and storage temperatures on overall quality of perishable food commodities. Pharma Innov2020; 9: 114–122.
53.
CarterCBNortonMG. Shaping and forming. In: Ceramic, materials: science and engineering. Chapter preview. Vol. 23. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, 2013, pp.423–437.
54.
AndersMJamesSMarcusK, et al.Latest in hot isostatic pressing for advanced ceramics. JSPM2025; 72: S1649–S1674.
55.
The design and operation of the freezing device can impact the conditions under 60. MoritzTLenkR. Current status of ceramic injection moulding, Historical review and introduction. Fraunhofer Institute for Ceramic Technologies and Systems, Winterbergstr, 28, 2009.
56.
WiesnerVL. Fabricating Complex-Shaped Components by Room-Temperature Injection Molding of Aqueous Ceramic Suspension Gels. Theses and Dissertations, the Faculty of Purdue, University of Valerie Wiesner, West Lafayette, Indiana, 2013.
57.
RiversRD. Method of injection molding powder metal parts U.S. Pat. No. 4113480. 1987.
58.
TongZBaozhenEXunweiW, et al.Research Progress on Optimization Methods of Powder Injection Molding Process Parameters. 2022.
59.
HéliJ. CIM - Ceramic Injection Moulding Manufacturing technology for advanced ceramic components. Conference: Webinar organised by the European Cluster of Ceramics2020.
60.
MiyamotoKMiyamotoHTakahashiY, et al.Preparation of Al2O3 ceramics by low pressure injection molding. Bulletin of the institute for chemical research. Kyoto Kyoto University1986; 64: 287–291.
61.
YavariRKhorsandH. Numerical and experimental study of injection step, separation, and imbalance filling in low pressure injection molding of ceramic components. J Euro Ceram Soc2021; 41: 6915–6924.
62.
BalzerBGaucklerJ. Noval colloidal forming technique: direct coagulation casting. In: Hand book of advanced ceramics. Zurich, Switzerland: ETH Zurich, Institute for Nonmetallic Materials, CH-8092, 2003, p.435.
63.
MoritzWTassiloM. Ceramic injuction modeling. Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering, 2021.
64.
ZygmuntowiczJTomaszewskaJŻurowskiR, et al.Zirconia-Alumina composites obtained by centrifugal slip casting as attractive sustainable material for application in construction. Materials (Basel2021; 14: 50.
65.
KujawaJGłodekMLiG, et al.Highly effective enzymes immobilization on ceramics: requirements for supports and enzymes. Sci Total Environ2021; 801: 149647.
66.
GauckerLJGrauleTJBaaderFH, et al.Enzyme catalysis of alumina forming. Key Eng Mater1999; 159–160: 135–150.
67.
ChenKArnoldFH. Engineering new catalytic activities in enzymes. Nat Catal2020; 3: 203–213.
68.
JinlongYYongH. Novel Colloidal Forming of Ceramics. 2020.
YangJHuangY. Novel in-situ coagulation casting of ceramic suspensions. In: Novel colloidal forming of Ceramics. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020, pp.405–548.
71.
YuYZouBWangX, et al.Rheological behavior and curing deformation of paste containing 85wt% Al2O3 ceramic during SLA-3D printing. Ceram Inter2022; 48: 24560–24570.
72.
LiwuWFritzA. Near-Net shape forming of advanced ceramics. Adv Eng Mater2000; 2: 110–11379.
73.
SigmundWM. Novel powder-processing methods for advanced ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc2000; 83: 1557–1574.
74.
MengXXuJZhuJ, et al.Porous yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramics with low thermal conductivity via a novel foam-gelcasting method. Mater. Sci2020; 55: 15106–15116.
75.
ZawrahMFKhattabRMGirgisLG, et al.Effect of CTAB as a foaming agent on the properties of alumina ceramic membranes. Ceram Inter2014; 40: 5299–5305.
76.
ZawrahMFKhattabRMGirgisLG, et al.Synthesis of anatase nano wire and its application as a functional top layer for alumina membrane. Ceram Inter2017; 43: 17104–17110.
77.
ChenYWangNOlaO, et al.Porous ceramics: light in weight but heavy in energy and environment technologies. Mat Sci Eng R2021; 143: 100589.
78.
ZawrahMFKhattabRMSaadEA, et al.Sinterability, microstructure and mechanical properties of gelcasted alumina ceramic. Interceram2010; 59: 22–27.
79.
ZawrahMFKhattabRMGirgisLG. Effect of Fe2O3 and MgO on gelcasting and sinterability of alumina ceramics. Interceram2013; 62: 204–210.
80.
KröllEPaulFVadalàM, et al.High porosity hafnia ceramics by freeze casting. Open Ceramics2024; 18: 100577.
81.
DengZLiuR. Research on the gel casting process and flexuraL strength of high-stability alumina ceramics. J. Phys Conf Ser2023; 2566: 012038.
82.
ZawrahMFKhttabRMGirgisLG, et al.The role of nano-TiO2 insintering and properties of alumina ceramics materials. Interceram2010; 59: 14–18.
83.
JanneyMAOmateteOOWallsCA, et al.Development of low-toxicity gelcasting systems. J. Am. Ceram. Soc1988; 81: 581–591.
84.
ZhangXZhangKZhangL, et al.Additive manufacturing of cellular ceramic structures: from structure to structure–function integration. Mate Design2022; 215: 110470.
85.
WanYLiXMaJ. Mullite porous ceramics with high strength for high-temperature thermal insulation. JMR&T2023; 27: 5692–5700.
86.
TrzepiecińskiT. Recent developments and trends in sheet metal forming. Metals (Basel)2020; 10: 779.
87.
LiXLiDZhouS, et al.Freeze-Casting of alumina and permeability analysis based on a 3D microstructure reconstructed using generative, adversarial networks. Materials (Basel)2024; 17: 2432.
88.
ArakiKHalloranJW. Porous ceramic bodies with interconnected pore channels by a novel freeze casting technique. J. Am. Ceram. Soc2005; 88: 1108–1114.
89.
WangKMengQZhaoK, et al.Freeze casting fabrication of porous ZrC/SiC decorated with SiC whiskers using polymeric precursors. Mater Lett2022; 3: 132362.
90.
DevilleSSaizETomsiaAP, et al.Freeze casting to engineer gradient porosity in hydroxyapatite-boron nitride nanotube composite scaffold for improved compressive strength and osteogenic potential. JMBBM2024; 150: 106283.
91.
ChenRWangCHuangY, et al.Ceramics with special porous structures fabricated by freeze- gelcasting: using tert-butyl alcohol as a TemplateJ. Am. Ceram. Soc2007; 90: 3478–3484.
92.
PottatharaYBVuhererTMaverU, et al.Morphological, mechanical, and in-vitro bioactivity of gelatine/ collagen/hydroxyapatite-based scaffolds prepared by unidirectional freeze-casting. Polym Test2021; 102: 107308.
93.
ZawrahMFBadrHAKhattabRM, et al.Fabrication and characterization of non-foamed and foamed geopolymers from industrial waste clays. Ceram Inter2021; 47: 29320–29327.
94.
ZawrahMFSadekHEHNgidaREA, et al.Effect of low-rate firing on physico-mechanical properties of unfoamed and foamed geopolymers prepared from waste clays. Ceram Intern2022; 48: 11330–11337.
95.
ZawrahMFAbo SawanSENgidaREA, et al.Effect of TiO2 nanofiber content on compressive strength of geopolymers fabricated from waste clay. J Mate Eng Perfor2024; 20: 12719–12730.
96.
HosseinHAEl-KheshenAAZawrahMF. Influence of silica-fume’s addition technique and curing conditions on microstructure, physical and mechanical properties of geopolymer. Sci Rep2025; 15: 1–17.
97.
ZawrahMFAtaMBHAbdelrahmanHS. Effect of acid concentration and curing conditions on microstructure, mechanical and electrical properties of phosphate geopolymers. Next Materials2025; 9: 100990.
98.
BarbareyMSEl-Sayed SelemanMEl KheshenAA, et al.Utilization of ladle furnace slag for fabrication of geopolymer: its application as catalyst for biodiesel production. Const Build Mater2024; 411: 134226.
99.
PauziAH. Experimental study on the kinetics of geopolymer’s solidification.2013.
100.
Abo SawanSEZawrahMFKhattabRM, et al.Fabrication sinterabilty and characterization of non-colored and colored geopolymers with improved properties. Mater Res Express2019; 6: 075205.
101.
Abo SawanSEZawrahMFKhattabRM, et al.In-situ formation of geopolymer foams through addition of silica fume: preparation and sinterability. Mater Chem Phy2020; 239: 121998.
102.
KanagarajBAnandNRajRS, et al.Techno-socio-economic aspects of Portland cement, geopolymer, and limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) composite systems: a-state-of-art-review. Const BuildMater2023; 398: 132484.
103.
SicilianoUCZhaoJTrindadeACC, et al.Influence of curing temperature and pressure on the mechanical and microstructural development of metakaolin-based geopolymers. Const Build Mater2024; 424: 135852.
104.
KazeCRNanaANanaGLL, et al.Thermal behaviour and microstructural evolution of metakaolin and meta-halloysite-based geopolymer binders: a comparative study. J Therm Anal Calorim2022; 147: 2055–2071.
105.
Al BakriAMMKamarudinHBinHussainM, et al.The effect of curing temperature on physical and chemical properties of geopolymers. Phys Procedia2011; 22: 286–291.
106.
TrinugrohoSNingrumRS. Optimum compressive strength of geopolymer concrete in variations comparison of ingredients and mixing time. J Phys Conf Ser2021; 1858: 012054.
107.
DwibedySParhiSKPandaS, et al.Performance of precursor characteristics in the realisation of geopolymer concrete: a review. Mag Concr Res2024; 76: 1404–1423.
108.
SoreSONshimiyimanaPMessanA, et al.Chemical and mineralogical characterizations of different kaolinitic clays from Burkina Faso: feasibility for the synthesis of geopolymer binders. Geosci2025; 15: 230.
109.
SujithaVSRajaSRushoMA, et al.Advances and developments in high strength geopolymer concrete for sustainable construction – A review. Case Studies in Constr Mater2025; 22: e04669.
110.
Abo SawanSEZawrahMF. Fabrication of geopolymer from fly ash: its performance as fire-resistant material and dye removal from aqueous solution. J Mate Eng Perfor2025; 34: 27254–27266.
111.
MokhtariPLinJNumkiatsakulP, et al.Valorization of mine tailings for sustainable geopolymer production. IJCES2025; 7: e70014.
112.
ZawrahMFAbo SawanSE. Recycling of Cyclones’ waste clay for production of green and thermally stable geopolymers. Inter J Enviro Sci Tech2023; 20: 12719–12730.
113.
Taborda-BarrazaMde AzevedoNHGleizePJP, et al.Comparative analysis of mechanical properties of geopolymers incorporating SiC nanowhiskers and TiO2 nanoparticles. Charact Appl Nanomater2022; 22: 286–291.
114.
ZawrahMFAbo SawanSE. Hardened and fired geopolymer mortars fabricated from cyclone’s waste clay and submicron sand: a comparative study. Const Build Mater2023; 364: 129998.
115.
KahilKWeinerSAddadiL, et al.Ion pathways in biomineralization: perspectives on uptake, transport, and deposition of calcium, carbonate, and phosphate. J Amer Chem Soc2021; 143: 21100–21112.
116.
ShaoGHanaorDAShenX, et al.Freeze casting: from low-dimensional building blocks to aligned porous structures—a review of novel materials, methods, and applications. Adv Mater2020; 32: 1907176.
117.
MalekiHShahbaziMAMontesS, et al.Mechanically strong silica-silk fibroin bioaerogel: a hybrid scaffold with ordered honeycomb micromorphology and multiscale porosity for bone regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2019; 11: 17256–17269.
118.
PutzAMIvankovOIKuklinAI, et al.Ordered mesoporous silica prepared in different solvent conditions: application for cu(II) and pb(II) adsorption. Gels2022; 8: 443.
119.
PutzAMIvankovOIKuklinAI, et al.Ordered mesoporous silica prepared in different solvent conditions: application for cu (II) and pb (II) adsorption. Gels2022; 8: 443.
120.
DuxsonPFernández-JiménezAProvisJL, et al.Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art. J Mate Sci2007; 42: 2917–2933.
121.
Huamán-MamaniFAMayta-PonceDLRodríguez-GuillénGP. Fabrication and evaluation of the mechanical behavior of geopolymer compounds using waste from the mining and construction industry. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering2021; 1054: 012002.
122.
WangYQuYWangC, et al.Enhanced flame retardancy of silica fume-based geopolymer composite coatings through in-situ formed boron phosphate from doped zinc phytate and boric acid. 2025.
123.
LiuYHuXDuY, et al.A review on high-temperature resistance of geopolymer concrete. J Build Eng2024; 98: 111241.
124.
SastryKGKSahityaPRavithejaA. Influence of nano TiO2 on strength and durability properties of geopolymer concrete. Mater Today Proc2021; 45: 1017–1025.
125.
MohammedFAKassemNNKisharEA, et al.Comparative analysis of foamed and non-foamed MK/GGBFS geopolymers for sorptive removal of manganese and cadmium ions. IJEST2025; 22: 14225–14244.
126.
ShiJLiuYWangE, et al.Physico-mechanical, thermal properties and durability of foamed geopolymer concrete containing cenospheres. Constr Build Mater2022; 325: 126841.
127.
LekshmiSSudhakumarJThomasS. Application of clay in geopolymer system: a state-of-the-art review. Material Today2023.
128.
JeremiahJJAbbeySJBoothCA, et al.Geopolymers as alternative sustainable binders for stabilisation of clays, A review. Geotechnics2021; 1: 439–459.
129.
Paz-GómezDCVilarinhoISPérez-MorenoSM, et al.Immobilization of hazardous wastes on one-part blast furnace slag-based geopolymers. Sustainability2021; 13: 13455.
130.
AmranMAl-FakihAChuSH, et al.Long-term durability properties of geopolymer concrete: an in-depth review. Case Stud Constr Mater2021; 15: e00661.
131.
CongPChengY. Advances in geopolymer materials: a comprehensive review. J Traffic Transp Eng2021; 8: 283–314.
132.
GaneshACMuthukannanM. Development of high performance sustainable optimized fiber reinforced geopolymer concrete and prediction of compressive strength. J Clean Prod2021; 282: 124543.
133.
HanQZhangPWuJ, et al.Comprehensive review of the properties of fly ash-based geopolymer with additive of nano-SiO2. Nanotechnol Rev2022; 11: 1478–1498.
134.
NurruddinMFSaniHMohammedBS, et al.Methods of curing geopolymer concrete: a review. Int J Adv Appl Sci2018; 5: 31–36.
135.
ShehataNMohamedOSayedET, et al.Geopolymer concrete as green building materials: recent applications, sustainable development and circular economy potentials. Sci Total Environ2022; 836: 155577.
136.
LuharSLuharI. Additive manufacturing in the geopolymer construction technology: a review. Open Constr Build Technol J2020; 14: 150–161.
137.
CuiYWangD. Effects of water on pore structure and thermal conductivity of fly ash-based foam geopolymers. Adv Mater Sci Eng2019; 1: 3202794.
138.
LuharILuharS. A comprehensive review on fly ash-based geopolymer. J Compos Sci2022; 6: 219.
139.
RalliZGPantazopoulouSJ. State of the art on geopolymer concrete. Int J Struct Integr2021; 12: 511–533.
140.
ChenJTongBLinJ, et al.Tailoring the chemical heterogeneity of mn-modified 0.75BiFeO3-0.25BaTiO3 ceramics for piezoelectric sensor applications. J EuroCeram Soc2022; 42: 3857–3864.
141.
ZaidiFHAAhmadRAbdullahMMAB, et al.Assessment of geopolymer concrete for underwater concreting properties. Arch Metall Mater2022; 2: 677–684.
142.
KamalHMKadhimMJHasanLM. Impact of nanoparticles on the performance of metakaolin-based geopolymer composites. J Mech Behav Mater2025; 34: 20250072.
143.
LuharSLuharIShaikhFUA. A review on the performance evaluation of autonomous self-healing bacterial concrete: mechanisms, strength, durability, and microstructural properties. J Compos Sci2022; 6: 23.
144.
XiaRChenJLiangR, et al.The positive effect of A-site nonstoichiometry on the electrical properties of Sr2Nb2O7 ceramics for high temperature piezoelectric sensor application. Ceramic International2022; 48: 22500–22508.
145.
LiuKLiuFZhangW, et al.Design and development of outstanding strain properties in NBT-based lead-free piezoelectric multilayer actuators by grain-orientation engineering. Acta Materials2023; 246: 118696.
146.
FanPLiuKMaW, et al.Progress and perspective of high strain NBT-based lead-free piezoceramics and multilayer actuators. J Materiomics2020; 7: 508–544.
147.
KabakovPKimTChengZ, et al.The versatility of piezoelectric composites. Annu Rev Mater Res2023; 53: 165–193.
148.
LuHCuiHLuG, et al.3D Printing and processing of miniaturized transducers with near-pristine piezoelectric ceramics for localized cavitation. Nat Communn2023; 14: 2418.
MukherjeeBPatelPMukherjeeJ. A review of the recent advances in dielectric resonator antennas. J Electromagn Waves Appl2020; 34: 1095–1158.
151.
WangXGaoXZhangZ, et al.Advances in modifications and high-temperature applications of silicon carbide ceramic matrix composites in aerospace: a focused review. J Euro Ceram Soc2021; 41: 4671–4688.
