This study examines decision-making determinants of microcredit expenditure by female self-help group (SHG) members in rural agricultural households of Gaya district, Bihar. SHG loans give women access to credit without collateral for 1% interest, compared to 5% by typical moneylenders. This study examines credit decision-making authority rather than loan repayment as a proxy for women’s empowerment. Unlike previous findings, poor agricultural households may struggle with repayment, but their female members can often make decisions. Male and female household members are included in the study, and females are considered decision-makers only when male members acknowledge their expenditure decisions. Loans in agricultural households are mainly used for consumption and farming, reflecting family priorities over personal empowerment. The descriptive statistics analysis and binary probit regression show that Scheduled Caste (SC) and Other Backward Class (OBC) women are more likely to participate in financial decisions than General caste and joint family women. Although SHG loans empower women as key financial agents in households where men lack equivalent credit access, the results show that women frequently hand over control of the loans to male family members, limiting their agency. The study shows that microcredit reduces poverty and improves household welfare, but does not empower women in patriarchal societies.
DAY-NRLM (Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana - National Rural Livelihoods Mission)datahttps://nrlm.gov.in/shgOuterReports.do?methodName=showShgreport on 9 January2025at 07:14 pmhttps://nrlm.gov.in/shgReport.do?methodName=showShgReportForDistrict&encd=05&stateName=BIHAR&reqtrack=q1eo1GAmfNXjY5g8JNyveAn91 on 9 January2025at 07:15 pm
2.
AlrefaeiN., AquinasP. G., & Al-MaamariO. A. (2023). Self-help group (SHG) in India: A path toward empowerment and poverty reduction. Social Work with Groups, 46(3), 249–263.
3.
AnjugamM., & RamasamyC. (2007). Determinants of women’s participation in self-help group (SHG)-led microfinance programme in Tamil Nadu. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 20(2), 283–298.
4.
ArbolinoR., CarlucciF., CiràA., YigitcanlarT., & IoppoloG. (2018). Mitigating regional disparities through microfinancing: An analysis of microcredit as a sustainability tool for territorial development in Italy. Land Use Policy, 70, 281–288.
5.
Arul SeeliL., & RengmaP. M. (2020). A study on empowerment of SHGs for addressing gender inequality in India—With special reference to women empowerment. Studies in Indian Place Names ISSN, 40(3), 1546–1557.
6.
ArunaM., & JyothirmayiM. R. (2011). The role of microfinance in women empowerment: A study on the SHG bank linkage program in Hyderabad (Andhra Pradesh). Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, 2(4), 78–95.
7.
BanerjeeA. V., & DufloE. (2011). Poor economics: A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty. Public Affairs.
8.
BasakD., & ChowdhuryI. R. (2024). Role of self-help groups on socioeconomic development and the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) among rural women in Cooch Behar District, India. Regional Sustainability, 5(2), 100140.
9.
BijuD. S., & TantiaV. (2024). Social capital in the form of self-help groups in India: A powerful resilient solution to reduce household financial vulnerability. Social Work with Groups, 47(3), 282–295.
10.
BrodyC., De HoopT., VojtkovaM., WarnockR., DunbarM., MurthyP., & DworkinS. L. (2015). Economic self-help group programs for improving women’s empowerment: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 11(1), 1–182.
11.
BrutonG. D., KhavulS., & ChavezH. (2011). Microlending in emerging economies: Building a new line of inquiry from the ground up. Journal of International Business Studies, 42, 718–739.
12.
ChantS. (1997). Women-headed households: Poorest of the poor?: Perspectives from Mexico, Costa Rica and the Philippines 1. IDS Bulletin, 28(3), 26–48.
13.
ChestonS., & KuhnL. (2002) Empowering women through microcredit. In HarrisS. D. (Ed.), Pathways out of poverty: Innovations in microcredit for the poorest families (pp. 167–228). Kumarian Press.
14.
CortijoM. J., & KabeerN. (2004). The wider social impacts of microfinance in Andhra Pradesh: A case study of SHARE Microfinance Ltd. Draft paper, Imp-Act Programmes.
15.
Daley-HarrisS., & LaegreidL. (2006). State of the microcredit summit campaign: Report 2006. Microcredit Summit Campaign.
16.
DattaU. (2015). Socio-economic effects of a self-help group intervention: Evidence from Bihar, India. The World Bank.
17.
DuttaA., & BanerjeeS. (2018). Does microfinance impede sustainable entrepreneurial initiatives among women borrowers? Evidence from rural Bangladesh. Journal of Rural Studies, 60, 70–81.
18.
GarikipatiS. (2008). The impact of lending to women on household vulnerability and women’s empowerment: Evidence from India. World development, 36(12), 2620–2642.
19.
GarikipatiS. (2013). Microcredit and women’s empowerment: Have we been looking at the wrong indicators?Oxford Development Studies, 41(supp. 1), S53–S75.
20.
GoetzA. M., & GuptaR. S. (1996). Who takes the credit? Gender, power, and control over loan use in rural credit programs in Bangladesh. World Development, 24(1), 45–63.
21.
HadiA. (2001). Promoting health knowledge through micro-credit programmes: Experience of BRAC in Bangladesh. Health Promotion International, 16(3), 219–227.
22.
HashemiS. M., SchulerS. R., & RileyA. P. (1996). Rural credit programs and women’s empowerment in Bangladesh. World Development, 24(4), 635–653.
23.
HossainF. (2002). Small loans, big claims. Foreign Policy, (132), 79.
24.
HussainJ., MahmoodS., & ScottJ. (2019). Gender, microcredit and poverty alleviation in a developing country: The case of women entrepreneurs in Pakistan. Journal of International Development, 31(3), 247–270.
25.
IslamA., NguyenC., & SmythR. (2015). Does microfinance change informal lending in village economies? Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Banking & Finance, 50, 141–156.
26.
JohnsonS., & KidderT. (1999). Globalization and gender-dilemmas for microfinance organizations. Small Enterprise Development, 10, 4–15.
27.
KabeerN. (1999). From feminist insights to an analytical framework: An institutional perspective on gender inequality. In KabeerN. & SubrahmanianR. (Eds.), Institutions, relations, and outcomes: A framework and case studies for gender aware planning (pp. 3–46). Zubaan.
28.
KabeerN. (1994). Reversed realities: Gender hierarchies in development thought. Verso.
29.
KabeerN. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464.
30.
KabeerN. (2001). Conflicts over credit: Re-evaluating the empowerment potential of loans to women in rural Bangladesh. World Development, 29(1), 63–84.
31.
KabeerN. (2005). Is microfinance a ‘magic bullet’ for women’s empowerment? Analysis of findings from South Asia. Economic & Political Weekly, 40(44/45), 4709–4718.
32.
KabeerN., & NoponenH. (2005). Social and economic impacts of PRADAN’s self-help group microfinance and livelihoods promotion program: Analysis from Jharkhand, India(Working Paper No. 11). Imp-Act Programme, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
33.
KarmakarK. G. (1999). Rural credit and self-help groups: Micro-finance needs and concepts in India (pp. 374). Sage Publications.
34.
KhandkerS. R. (1998). Fighting poverty with microcredit: Experience in Bangladesh. Oxford University Press.
35.
LeachF., & SitaramS. (2002). Microfinance and women’s empowerment: A lesson from India. Development in Practice, 12(5), 575–588.
36.
MalhotraA., & SchulerS. R. (2005). Women’s empowerment as a variable in international development. Measuring Empowerment: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, 1(1), 71–88.
37.
MayouxL. (1999). Questioning virtuous spirals: Micro-finance and women’s empowerment in Africa. Journal of International Development, 11(7), 957.
38.
Microcredit Summit. (1997). The Microcredit Summit: Declaration and plan of action. https://rfd.org.ec/biblioteca/pdfs/LG-136.pdf
39.
MohapatraS., & SahooB. K. (2016). Determinants of participation in self-help groups (SHG) and its impact on women empowerment. Indian Growth and Development Review, 9(1), 53–78.
40.
MontgomeryR., BhattacharyaD., & HulmeD. (1996). Credit for the poor in Bangladesh. Finance Against Poverty, 2, 94–176.
41.
NaderY. F. (2008). Microcredit and the socio-economic well-being of women and their families in Cairo. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(2), 644–656.
42.
NITI Aayog. (2023). National multidimensional poverty index: A progress review2023. Government of India. https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2023-08/India-National-Multidimentional-Poverty-Index-2023.pdf
43.
NyarkoS. A., BeislandL. A., & MerslandR. (2025). Lending to women and credit risk in microfinance institutions: The moderating effects of patriarchy and female leadership. The Journal of Development Studies, 61(4), 614–637.
44.
PandhareA., BellampalliP. N., & YadavaN. (2024). Transforming rural women’s lives in India: The impact of microfinance and entrepreneurship on empowerment in self-help groups. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 62.
45.
PittM. M., & KhandkerS. R. (1998). The impact of group-based credit programs on poor households in Bangladesh: Does participants’ gender matter?Journal of Political Economy, 106(5), 958–996.
46.
PittM. M., KhandkerS. R., & CartwrightJ. (2006). Empowering women with microfinance: Evidence from Bangladesh. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 54(4), 791–831.
47.
PuhazhendiV., & BadatyaK. C. (2002, November). SHG-Bank linkage programme for rural poor: An impact assessment. Seminar on SHG Bank Linkage Programme at New Delhi, Micro Credit Innovations Department, Nabard, Mumbai.
48.
RaghunathanK., KannanS., & QuisumbingA. R. (2019). Can women’s self-help groups improve access to information, decision-making, and agricultural practices? The Indian case. Agricultural Economics, 50(5), 567–580.
49.
RahmanR. I. (1986). Impact of Grameen Bank on the situation of poor rural women (No. 1). Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies, Agriculture and Rural Development Division.
50.
RahmanA. (1999). Micro-credit initiatives for equitable and sustainable development: Who pays?World Development, 27(1), 67–82.
51.
SankaranM. (2005). Micro credit in India: An overview. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 91–100.
52.
SapkotaA., & BistaN. B. (2022). Role of microfinance on women empowerment: A case of Kathmandu valley. Sustainability A Way Forward, 134–147.
53.
SchulerS. R., HashemiS. M., & BadalS. H. (1998). Men’s violence against women in rural Bangladesh: Undermined or exacerbated by microcredit programmes?Development in Practice, 8(2), 148–157.
54.
SchulerS. R., HashemiS. M., RileyA. P., & AkhterS. (1996). Credit programs, patriarchy and men’s violence against women in rural Bangladesh. Social Science & Medicine, 43(12), 1729–1742.
55.
SowmyaB. V., & ReddyR. (2022). Impact of microfinance in the empowerment of women workers—A case study. UGC Care Group I Journal, 82(12), 1–16.
56.
ToddH. (2001). Paths out of poverty: The impacts of SHARE Microfin Ltd. in Andhra Pradesh. Imp-Act Report.
57.
VeallM. R., & ZimmermannK. F. (1996). Pseudo-R2 measures for some common limited dependent variable models. Journal of Economic Surveys, 10(3), 241–259.
58.
VinodhiniR. L., & VaijayanthiP. (2016). Self-help group and socio-economic empowerment of women in rural India. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(27), 67–89.
59.
YunusM. (1999). The Grameen Bank. Scientific American, 281(5), 114–119.
60.
ZhaoE. Y., & WryT. (2016). Not all inequality is equal: Deconstructing the societal logic of patriarchy to understand microfinance lending to women. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 1994–2020.
