Abstract
This paper suggests a framework for rational evaluation of changes in the rules and practice of sport competitions. The framework is based on an articulation of certain fundamental, intuitive ideals viewed as latent in the sport culture. It is thus seen as an expression of a particular ludic rationality of competitive games. Through the discussion of an actual case from the sport of orienteering, it is demonstrated how such ludic rationality can be realized in practice. Firstly, three general ideal norms for sport competitions are articulated. Secondly, these norms are specified to the sport in question. Thirdly, a rational solution in the case under consideration is sought. It is argued that critical reflection on significant changes in competitive sport based on ludic rationality is of primary importance for the realization of sport as a meaningful cultural practice in the future.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
