Sport appears to be particularly geared to test out contradictory results in status crystallization research as it allows the identification of conditioning variables with a high level of specificity (Malewski). The potentials of extending crystallization theory and research to rank crystallization, i.e. within group/team ranks, is outlined but not followed in the present analysis. Results based on samples of adults and of athletes in 6 different individual and team sports show that participants in sport up to age 32 are lower in status crystallization with a tendency of lower crystallization by level of sport (recreational, competitive, top sport). Regression analysis for the age group of 27-32 shows that the low status crystallization of athletes, of and those at the top in particular, is mainly to be explained by the interaction of and not the singularly tested major effects, although the latter show some power of explanation as well.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, S., 1953: Status Congruence as a Variable in Small Group Performance . Social Forces32: 16-22.
2.
Bachleitner, R., 1988: Soziale Schichtung im Sport. Sportwissenschaft18: 237-53.
3.
Blalock, H.M., 1966: The Identification Problem and Theory Building: the Case of Status Inconsistency. American Sociological Review31: 52-61.
4.
Bourdieu, P., 1978: Sport and Social Class. Science Information17: 819-4U.
5.
Brown, W.C., Cretser, G.A. and Laswell, T.E., 1988: Measuring Status Inconsistency: More Trouble than it's Worth? Sociological Perspectives31: 213-37.
6.
Cartwright, D. & Zander, A., 1961: Group DynamicsEvanston, IL : Row Peterson.
7.
Esser, H., 1986: Theoretical and Methodological Problems in Status Inconsistency Research. Pp. 103-17 in Strasser and Hodge, op.cit.
8.
Geschwender, J.A., 1970: Status Discrepancy and Prejudice Reconsidered. American Journal of Sociology75: 863-65.
9.
Gruneau, R., 1983: Class, Sports and Social Development. Amherst: University of Massachussetts Press .
10.
Jackson, E.F. & Curtis, R.F., 1972: Effects of Vertical Mobility and Status Inconsistency: A Body of Negative Evidence. American Sociological Review37: 701-13.
11.
Landecker, W.S., 1970: Status Congruence, Class Crystallization, and Social Cleavage . Sociology and Social Research54: 343-55.
12.
Landecker, W.S., 1981: Class CrystallizationNew Brunswick : Rutgers University Press.
13.
Landers, D. & Lüschen, G.1974: Team Performance and the Cohesiveness of Competitive Coacting Groups. Int. Review Sport Sociology8: 57-71.
14.
Lenski, G.E., 1954: Status Crystallization: A Non-Vertical Dimension of Social Status. American Sociological Review19: 405-13.
15.
Lenski, G.E., 1956: Social Participation and Status Crystallization . American Sociological Review21: 458-64.
16.
Lenski, G.E., 1967: Status Inconsistency and the Vote: A Four Nation Test . American Sociological Review32: 288-301.
17.
Lüschen, G., 1984: Status Crystallization, Social Class, Integration and Sport. Int. Review Sociology Sport19: 283-94.
18.
Lüschen, G., 1986: Status Crystallization and Sport: Results of a Pilot Study with some Explanatory Problems for the Theory. Pp. 493-507 in Strasser and Hodge, op.cit.
19.
Lüschen, G., 1986: The Practical Uses of Sociology of Sport: Some Methodological Issues. Pp. 245-54 in C. R. Reed and A. W. Miracle.Sport and Social Theory. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics .
20.
Lüschen, G., Thissen, G., Kraus, G. and Rütten, A., 1989: Die Fußballer und die Struktur ihrcr Mannschaft . Unp. Research Report for the German Soccer Federation (DFB).
21.
Lüschen, G. & Rütten, A., 1991: Sport als Explorationsfeld soziologischer Kristallisationsforschung . Theoretische Entwürfe und empirische Ergebnisse. Forthcoming in Winkler/Weis.
22.
Malewski, A., 1965: The Degree of Status Incongruence and Its Effects . Pp. 303-8 in R. Bendix and S. M. Lipset. Class, Status and Power. New York: Free Press (orig. Polish Soc. Bulletin1963/7).
23.
Malewski, A., 1964: Verhalten und InteraktionOpladen : Westdeutscher Verlag (orig. Polish).
24.
Meding, M., 1989: Zum Zusammenhang zwischen Kohäsion und Erfolg bei Sportmannschaften . Sportwissenschaft19: 247-71.
25.
Mitchell, R.E.1964: Methodological Notes on a Theory of Status Crystallization . Public Opinion Quarterly28: 315-30.
26.
Renson, R., 1976: Social Status Symbolism of Sport Stratification . Hermes10: 433-33.
27.
Rütten, A., 1985: Status Crystallization, Status Combinations, and Differential Processes in Sport. Paper at ICSS-Meetings in Prague .
28.
Rütten, A., 1989: Strukturmodelle und Methoden in der Kristallisationstheorie . Sportwissenschaft19: 297-310.
29.
Rütten, A., 1989b: Statuskristallisation und psychischer Streß. Pp. 97-104 in G. Lüschen et al. Health and Illness in America and Germany. Munich: Oldenbourg.
30.
Spady, W.: Lament for the letterman. American Journal Sociology75: 680-702.
31.
Strasser, H., 1986: Renewing the Concept of Status Inconsistency. Paper at 1986 World Congress of Sociology in Delhi.
32.
Strasser, H. & Hodge, R.W., 1986: Status Inconsistency in Modern SocietyDuisburg: Sozialwissenschaftliche Kooperative .
33.
Taylor, I., 1987: Putting the Boot into Working Class Sport: British Soccer after Bradford and Brussels. Sociology of Sport Journal4: 171-91.
34.
Treiman, D., 1977: Occupational Prestige in Comparative PerspectiveNew York: Academic Press.
35.
Vernon, S.W. & Buffler, P.A., 1988: The Status of Status Inconsistency. Epidemiological Review10: 65-86.
36.
Wuggenig, U., 1982: Die Operationalisierung von objektiver und subjektiver Statusinkonsistenz. University of Hannover.
37.
Wuggenig, U., 1990: Eine strukturelle Version der Theorie der Statusinkonsistenz . Pp. 37-69 in K. D. Opp and R. Wippler.Empirischer Theorienvergleich. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
38.
Zimmermann, E., 1973: Fragen zur Theoric der Statusinkonsistenz. Zeitschrift Soziologie2: 83-100.
39.
Zimmermann, E., 1986: Almost All You Wanted to Know About Status Inconsistency but Never Dared to Measure: Theoretical Deficits in Empirical Research on Status Inconsistency. Pp. 38-52 in Strasser and Hodge, op.cit.
