Applying and extending Elias's (1978) methodological prescriptions for analyzing group dynamics, an explanation is provided of the complex social processes through which many international games are subject to chronic changes to their codified rules. Elias emphasizes that social dynamics are related to the balance of power, the division of function, and the level of complexity of figurations. Applying this perspective, rule-changes are to be understood as the outcome of conflicts of interest between the functionally interdependent groups who produce games, each of whom mobilize their respective power and resources in order to realise their interests. Since there is a balance of power and a division of functions amongst these groups, changes to game rules are both unanticipated and unintended.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrams, P. (1982), Historical SociologyOpen Books , London
2.
Bauman, Z. (1979), 'The Phenomenon of Norbert Elias' in Sociology13 (1) January, 117-25
3.
Becker, H. (1984), ArtworldsUniversity of California Press
4.
Bendix, R. (1978), Foreward to Elias, N. What isSociology? Ibid.
5.
Black, M. (1962), Models and MetaphorsCornell University Press
6.
Boudon, R. (1986), Theories of Social Change; a critical appraisalPolity Press, London
7.
Bourdieu, P. (1982), 'The Production of Belief' in Media, Culture and Society2 (3) 261-94
8.
Brohm, J-M. (1978), Sport: a Prison of Measured TimeHamilton Press, New Jersey
9.
Cicourel, A. (1964), Method and Measurement in Sociology. New York, Collier Macmillan
10.
Coulter, J. (1971), 'Decontextualized meanings: Current approaches to verstehen investigations', in: SociologicalReview, 19,301-26.
11.
Coulter, J. (1983), The Social Construction of Mind: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Linguistic PhilosophyBasil Blackwell, Oxford
12.
Critcher, C. (1988), Review of 'Quest for Excitement', Elias N. and Dunning E., in Leisure Studies
13.
Curtis, (1986), Isn't it difficult to support some of the notions of the civilising process? In Rees C. and Miracle A., Sport and Social TheoryHuman Kinetics57-66
14.
D'Agostino, F. (1981), 'The ethos of games' in J Philosophy of Sport Vol. 8, 7-18
15.
Dunning, E. (1979), 'The figurational dynamics of modern sport' in Sportswissenschaft9 (4)341-59.
16.
Dunning, E. & Sheard, K. (1979), Barbarians, Gentlemen and PlayersMartin Robertson, Oxford
17.
Elias, N. & Dunning, E. (1971), 'Dynamics of sports groups with special reference to football' in Sociology of SportE. Dunning (ed) Frank CASS, London
18.
Elias, N. (1956), Problems of Involvement and Detachment in British Journal of Sociology,8, 226-52
19.
Elias, N. (1978a), The Civilising Process Vol 1: The History of MannersBlackwell , Oxford
20.
Elias, N. (1978b), What is Sociology? Hutchinson, London
21.
Elias, N. (1982), The Civilising Process Vol2: State Formation and CivilisationBlackwell, Oxford
22.
Elias, N. & Dunning, E. (1986), The Quest for ExcitementBlackwell , Oxford
23.
English Basketball Association (1985), Basketball Case-Book: Comments and Interpretations on the Official Rules of Basketball; E.B.B.A, Calomax House, Leeds.
24.
Garfinkel, H. (1963), 'Conception of and experiments with 'trust' as a condition of stable concerted actions'. in: Harvey, O. T. (ed.). Motivation and Social Interaction, Ronald Press., 187-238.
25.
Garfinkel, H. (1967), Studies in Ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.
26.
Giddens, A. (1976), New Rules for Sociological Method Hutchinson, London
27.
Guttman, G. (1978), From Ritual to RecordColumbia University Press, New York
28.
Hoggett, P. & Boshop, J. (1987), Organising around Enthusiasms Comedia, London
29.
Horne, J. & Jary, D. (1987), The figurational sociology of sport and leisure of Elias and Dunning: an exposition and a critique in Sport, Leisure and Social Relations, J. Horne, D. Jary & A. Tomlinson (ed) Routledge, Kegan and Paul , London
30.
Ingham, A. & Hardy, S. (1984), 'Sport Structuration and Hegemomy' in Theory, Culture and Society2 (2) 85-103
31.
Kenyon, G. (1968) Aspects of Contemporary Sports SociologyProceedings of C.I.C. Symposium, Chicago Athletic Institute
32.
Kew, F. ( 1986), 'Playing the Game': an ethnomethodological perspective in International Review of Sports Sociology21, 4, 305-22
33.
Kew, F. ( 1987), Contested rules: an explanation of how games change inInternational Review of Sports Sociology22, 2, 122-35.
34.
Lepenies, W. (1978), Norbert ELIAS: an outsider full of unprejudiced insight in New German Critique15, 57-64
35.
Loy, J.McPherson, B. & Kenyon, G. (1976), Sport & Social SystemsAddison-Wesley.
36.
Lüschen, G. (1970), 'Co-operation, Association and Contest' in J. Conflict Resolution14,21-34
37.
Maguire, J. (1988), 'The Commercialisation of English Elite Basketball, 1972-88a: figurational perspective in International Review of Sport Sociology23 (4) 305-24
38.
Rojek, C. (1985), Capitalism and Leisure Theory Tavistock, London
39.
Rigauer, B. (1982), Sport and WorkColumbia University Press, New York
40.
Smith, D. (1984), 'Norbert Elias-established or outsider?Sociological Review32, 367-89
41.
Stone, G. (1970), American Sports: Play and Display' in The Sociology of SportE. Dunning (ed), Frank Cass, London
42.
Wehowsky, A. (1978), Making ourselves more flexible than we are — reflections on Norbert Elias in New German Critique, 1567-80
