Based on the study of a corpus of 24 sports fiction films featuring a young woman as the central character, this article examines female representation in this cinematic genre—a genre which, historically, has often sidelined women. In particular, it examines how these films contribute to the maintenance of male domination. On the one hand, the study highlights how these works reinforce patriarchy, by regularly placing sportswomen under the authority of a dominant, often decision-making male. On the other hand, it also highlights the recurrent valorization of the father figure, in contrast to a mother figure frequently denigrated or presented as regressive.
Abdel-ShehidGKalman-LambN (2015) Multiculturalism, gender and Bend it Like Beckham. Social Inclusion3(3): 142–152.
2.
ArambourouC (2017) Du patriarcat aux modes de domination. Travail, Genre et Sociétés38(2): 181–186.
3.
AshcraftC (2003) The trouble with boys: Confronting competing masculinities in popular culture and schooling. Taboo: The Journal of Culture and Education7(2): 39–66.
4.
BarilA (2007) De la construction du genre à la construction du ‘sexe’: Les thèses féministes postmodernes dans l’œuvre de Judith Butler. Recherches Féministes20(2): 61–90.
5.
BarthesR (1957) Mythologies. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
6.
BarthesR (1968) L'effet de réel. Communications11(1): 84–89.
7.
BeaurainNPassevantCPortisL (2004) Le cinéma populaire et ses idéologies. L'Homme & la Sociétén° 154(4): –8.
8.
BlackPSharmaU (2001) Men are real, women are ‘made up’: Beauty therapy and the construction of femininity. The Sociological Review49(1): 100–116.
9.
BohuonA (2012) Le test de féminité dans les compétitions sportives: une histoire classée X?Paris: éditions iXe.
10.
BourdieuP (1976) Le champ scientifique. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales2(2): 88–104.
11.
BourdieuP (1998) La Domination Masculine. Paris: Le Seuil.
12.
BoutangA (2013) “Jeunes, je vous ai compris”: Stratégies de ciblage dans les teen movies, des années 1950 à aujourd’hui. Le Temps des Médiasn21(2): 82–103.
13.
BredaH (2017) La critique féministe profane en ligne de films et de séries télévisées. Réseaux201(1): 87–114.
14.
BrownmillerS (2013) Femininity. New York, NY: Open road media.
15.
BruceT (2015) Assessing the sociology of sport: On media and representations of sportswomen. International Review for the Sociology of Sport50(4–5): 380–384.
16.
BurchN (2000) Double speak. De l'ambiguïté tendancielle du cinéma hollywoodien. Réseaux. Communication-Technologie-Société18(99): 99–130.
17.
ButlerJTroubleG (1990) Feminism and the subversion of identity. Gender Trouble3(1): 3–17.
18.
CaudwellJ (2008) Girlfight: Boxing women. Sport in Society: Cultures, Commerce, Media, Politics11(2/3): 227–239.
19.
CaudwellJ (2009) Girlfight and Bend it Like Beckham: Screening women, sport, and sexuality. Journal of Lesbian Studies13(3): 255–271.
20.
ChareN (2015) Sportswomen in Cinema: Film and the Frailty Myth. London: IB Tauris.
21.
CrossonS (2013) Sport and Film. New York: Routledge.
22.
CuttingJ (2016) Narrative theory and the dynamics of popular movies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review23(6): 1713–1743.
23.
Damian-GaillardBMontañolaSOlivesiA (2019) L'assignation de genre dans les médias: Attentes, perturbations, reconfigurations. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.
24.
DelmarR (2018) What is feminism? In: Theorizing Feminism. New York, NY: Routledge, 5–28.
25.
DriscollC (2011) Teen Film: A Critical Introduction. Oxford & New York: Berg.
26.
DupontSParisH (2013) L’adolescente et le cinéma. De Lolita à Twilight. Toulouse: Érès.
27.
DuvalJ (2016) Le Cinéma au XXe siècle, entre loi du marché et règles de l’art. Paris: CNRS Éditions.
28.
FischerL (1996) Cinematernity. Film, Motherhood and Genre. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
GaudreaultAJostF (2017) Le récit cinématographique. Paris: Armand Colin.
30.
GreimasAJ (1966) Sémantique structurale. Recherche et méthode. Paris: Larousse.
31.
GriffithsR (2006) British Queer Cinema. London: Routledge.
32.
HallS (1997) The work of representation. In: HallS (ed) Representation. Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. Londres: Sage Publications, 13–74.
33.
HargreavesJAndersonE (2014) Routledge Handbook of Sport, Gender and Sexuality. New York: Routledge.
34.
Hill CollinsP (2011) “Images de la femme noire dans l’Amérique contemporaine”?Volume!8(2): 41–63.
35.
KaplanEA (1983) Women and Film: Both Sides of the Camera. New York: Methuen.
36.
KristevaJ (1974) La Révolution du langage poétique. Lautréamont et Mallarmé. Paris: Seuil.
37.
LewisJ (2013) The Road to Romance and Ruin: Teen Films and Youth Culture. London: Routledge.
38.
LiebermanV (2014) Sports Heroines on Film: A Critical Study of Cinematic Women Athletes, Coaches and Owners. Jefferson: McFarland.
LindnerK (2012) Situated bodies, cinematic orientations: Film and (queer) phenomenology. In: Maty BaSHigbeeW (eds) De-westernizing Film Studies. London: Routledge, 152–165.
41.
LouveauC (2004) Sexuation du travail sportif et construction sociale de la féminité 1. Cahiers du genren° 36: 163–183.
42.
MaloneA (2018) The Female Gaze: Essential Movies made by Women. Miami: Mango Media Inc.
43.
MardonA (2010) Construire son identité de fille et de garçon: Pratiques et styles vestimentaires au collège. Cahiers du Genre49(2): 133–154.
44.
MeanLJKassingJW (2008) “I would just like to be known as an athlete”: Managing hegemony, femininity, and heterosexuality in female sport. Western Journal of Communication72(2): 126–144.
45.
MennessonC (2005) Être une femme dans le monde des hommes: socialisation sportive et construction du genre. Paris: L’Harmattan.
46.
MetzC (1968) Essais sur la signification au cinéma. Paris: Klincksieck.
MontañolaS (2011) La complexe médiatisation des sportives de haut niveau. Le cas des championnats du monde d’athlétisme. Sciences de la Société83: 82–103.
49.
MulveyL (1975) Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen16(3): 6–18.
50.
MulveyL (2013) Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. In: PenleyC (ed) Feminism and Film Theory. New York, NY: Routledge, 57–68.
51.
NashI (2006) American Sweethearts: Teenage Girls in Twentieth-Century Popular Culture. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
52.
PearsonDW (2001) The depiction and characterization of women in sport film. Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal10(1): 103–124.
53.
PearsonDWCurtisRLHaneyCA, et al. (2003) Sport films: Social dimensions over time, 1930-1995. Journal of Sport and Social Issues27(2): 145–161.
54.
PoultonERoderickM (2008) Introducing sport in films. Sport in Society11(2-3): 107–116.
55.
RolletB (2007) Télévision et homosexualité: 10 ans de fictions francaises, 1992-2005. Paris: L’Harmattan.
56.
RubinG (1984) Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In: VanceC (ed.) Pleasure and Danger. London: Routledge & Kegan, Paul, 267–319.
57.
SharyT (2005) Teen Movies: American Youth on Screen. London and New York: Wallflower Press.
58.
SilvermanK (1983) The Subject of Semiotics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
59.
SudreD (2022) La représentation des adolescentes dans les films de sport: Analyse d’une image stéréotypée et régressive des jeunes sportives à l’écran. Agora Débats/Jeunesses91(2): 37–51.
60.
TreagusM (2002) Not Bent at All: Bend It Like Beckham, Girls’ Sport and the Spectre of the Lesbian. M/C Journal5(6). doi:https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.2001
61.
TudorA (2013) Image and Influence: Studies in the Sociology of Film. New York: Routledge.
62.
WalbySHeinenJ (2016) Postpostmodernisme? Théoriser la complexité sociale 1. Cahiers du Genre4(3): 53–72.
63.
WardLM (2016) Media and sexualization: State of empirical research, 1995–2015. The Journal of Sex Research53(4-5): 560–577.
64.
WilliamsL (1986) Personal Best: women in love. Jump Cut27(11): 11–12.
