Due to global migration, addressing essential needs like nutrition, housing, and security has become a pressing concern for migrants and host communities, with social cohesion being a primary focus. To promote social cohesion, many state policies now include provisions that aim to leverage cultural and lifestyle differences as assets. This research examines the role of Olympic education programmes implemented through sports in establishing social cohesion among refugees. A qualitative single case study approach was used, collecting data through interviews and documents. Thematic analysis revealed intergroup conflict as a major obstacle to social cohesion, and the programme was seen as a potential mitigating factor. Stakeholders had diverse but similar goals and took action to achieve them. The programme's outcomes contributed to targeted development, with stakeholders recognizing the importance of a long-term social cohesion process. Short-term achievements also indicated potential medium and long-term changes.
AgerAStrangA (2004) Indicators of integration: Final report. London: Home Office Development and Practice.
2.
Al RamiahAHewstoneM (2013) Intergroup contact as a tool for reducing, resolving, and preventing intergroup conflict: Evidence, limitations, and potential. American Psychologist68(7): 527–542.
3.
AmaraMAquilinaDArgentE, et al. (2005) The roles of sport and education in the social inclusion of asylum seekers and refugees: An evaluation of policy and practice in the UK. Loughborough: Loughborough University and Stirling University.
4.
AtmacaB (2009) Syrian refugees and social cohesion: A qualitative analysis of non-formal educational activities provided by non-governmental organizations. Master Thesis. Istanbul Bilgi University, Istanbul.
5.
BartramDPorosMVMonforteP (2017) Key concepts in migration. California: Sage.
6.
BeutlerI (2008) Sport serving development and peace: Achieving the goals of the United Nations through sport.Sport in Society11(4): 359–369.
7.
BinderDL (2012) Olympic values education: Evolution of pedagogy.Educational Review64(3): 275–302.
8.
BlockKGibbsL (2017) Promoting social inclusion through sport for refugee background youth in Australia: Analyzing different participation models. Social Inclusion5(2): 91–100.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
11.
ChenSHenryIKoL-M (2013) Meta-evaluation, analytic logic models and the assessment of impacts of sports policies. In: HenryIKoL-M (eds) Handbook of sport policy. London: Routledge, 33–47.
12.
CheongPHEdwardsRGoulbourneH, et al. (2007) Immigration, social cohesion and social capital: A critical review. Critical Social Policy27(1): 24–49.
13.
CoalterF (2007) A wider social role for sport: Who’s keeping the score?Abingdon: Routledge.
14.
CoalterFTheeboomMTruyensJ (2020) Developing a programme theory for sport and employability programmes for NEETs. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics12(4): 679–697.
15.
Council of Europe (2000) Diversity and cohesion: New challenges for the integration of immigrants and minorities. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
16.
Council of the European Union (2020) Resolution of the council and of the representatives of the governments of the member states meeting within the council on the European union work plan for sport (1 January 2021–30 June 2024) 2020/C419/01. Brussels: Council of the European Union.
17.
CradockALKawachiIColditzGA, et al. (2009) Neighborhood social cohesion and youth participation in physical activity in Chicago. Social Science & Medicine68(3): 427–435.
18.
DaCostaLAbreuNMiragayaA (2006) Multiculturalism and universal proclaimed values in the Olympic movement: An approach to human rights and sports development. ICSSPE Bulletin48: 1–7. Available at http://sportsinbrazil.com.br/artigos/multiculturalism.pdf.
19.
DohertyATaylorT (2007) Sport and physical recreation in the settlement of immigrant youth. Leisure31(1): 27–55.
20.
DoidgeMKeechMSandriE (2020) Active integration: Sports clubs taking an active role in the integration of refugees. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics12(2): 305–319.
21.
DragolovGIgnáczZSLorenzJ, et al. (2016) Theoretical framework of the social cohesion radar. In: DragolovGIgnáczZSLorenzJDelheyJBoehnkeKUnzickerK (eds) Springer briefs in well-being and quality of life research. Social cohesion in the western world. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32464-7_1
22.
DündarA (2019) Impact of physical education lesson on adaptation of Syrian refugee school age children in Turkey. World Journal of Education9(1): 266–273.
23.
FangenK (2010) Social exclusion and inclusion of young immigrants—presentation of an analytical framework. Nordic Journal of Youth Research (YOUNG)18: 133–156.
24.
FonsecaXLukoschSBrazierF (2019) Social cohesion revisited: A new definition and how to characterize it’. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research32(2): 231–253.
25.
ForrestRKearnsA (2011) Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban Studies38(12): 2125–2143. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub. com/doi/10.1080/00420980120087081.
26.
FriedkinNEJohnsenEC (2003) Attitude change, affect control, and expectation states in the formation of influence networks. Advances in Group Process20: 1–29.
27.
GiulianottiR (2004) Human rights, globalization, and sentimental education: The case of sport.Sport in Society7(3): 355–369.
28.
Grece-Edward GalabuziCT (2010) Social cohesion, social exclusion, social capital. Peel: Region of Peel.
29.
Grimminger-SeidenstickerEMöhwaldA (2020) Enhancing social cohesion in PE classes within an intercultural learning program: Results of a quasi-experimental intervention study. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy25(3): 316–329.
30.
GürelDBüyükşahinY (2020) Education of Syrian refugee children in Turkey: Reflections from the application. International Journal of Progressive Education16(5): 426–442.
31.
HarwoodG (2019) What is the meaning of sport for young people from refugee backgrounds? A case study of a state high school in Brisbane, Queensland. Doctoral Dissertation. School of Public Health and Social Work Faculty of Health Queensland University of Technology, Queensland.
32.
HarwoodGSendallMCHeeschKC, et al. (2021) A Bourdieusian analysis exploring the meaning of sport for young women from refugee backgrounds in an Australian state high school. Sport, Education and Society26(2): 175–187.
33.
HenryI (2015)Research for the cult committee - the role of sport in fostering open and inclusive societies. Brussels: European Parliament. Available at https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1335975/the role-of-sport-in-fostering-open-and-inclusive-societies/1942793/
34.
HickmanMCrowleyHMaiN (2008) Immigration and social cohesion in the. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Available at https://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/default/files/jrf/migrated/files/2230-deprivation-cohesion-immigration.pdf
35.
HuffmanAMHillyerSJ (2014) Service-learning: An educational model for sport and community development. In: YoungKOkadaC (eds) Sport, social development and peace (Research in the sociology of sport). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, 67–86.
KaraşahinoğluTYıldıranİ (2021) Friendship perceptions of Syrian and Turkish children attending the project of support to sport education for children. International Journal of Progressive Education17(2): 305–318.
38.
KearnsAForrestR (2000) Social cohesion and multilevel urban governance. Urban Studies37(5–6): 995–1017.
39.
KrouwelABoonstraNDuyvendakJW, et al. (2006) A good sport? Research into the capacity of recreational sports to integrate Dutch minorities. International Review for the Sociology of Sport41(2): 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690206075419
40.
KunzV (2009) Sport as a post-disaster psychosocial intervention in Bam, Iran. Sport in Society12(9): 1147–1157.
41.
LevermoreR (2008) Sport: A new engine of development?Progress in Development Studies8(2): 183–190.
42.
MerriamSB (2013)Qualitative research: A guide to pattern and application. Ankara: Nobel.
43.
MillsCThornerR (2008) Rebuilding young refugee’s lives: An Olympic movement sport for life programme. Proceedings of Building Healthy Communities: North and South: 89–100. Retrieved from https://ecald.com/assets/Resources/Assets/Building-Healthy Communities.pdf#page=96.
44.
MorrowSL (2005) Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology52(2): 250–260.
45.
MoustakasL (2020) Can sport for development programs improve educational outcomes? A rapid evidence assessment. Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research87(1): 56–69.
46.
MoustakasL (2023a) Sport for social cohesion: A conceptual framework linking practice and theory. Sport in Society27(10): 1549–1567.
47.
MoustakasL (2023b) From evangelical to structural: A typology of European sport for social cohesion programs. Journal of Global Sport Management: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/24704067.2023.2197004.
48.
MoustakasL, et al. (2021) Mapping sport and social cohesion in Europe: An exploratory study. Cologne, Germany: Sport and Social Cohesion Lab.
49.
MüllerN (2004) Olympic education. The Sport Journal, Published by the United States Sports Academy7(1). Available at https://thesportjournal.org/article/olympic-education/
50.
NanayakkaraS (2015) An evaluation of the effectiveness of an Olympism education programme to resolve conflicts between primary school students in Sri Lanka. Sabaragamuwa University Journal14(1): 1–23.
51.
NathanSBunde-BirousteAEversC, et al. (2010) Social cohesion through football: A quasi experimental mixed methods design to evaluate a complex health promotion program. BMC Public Health10: 87.
52.
NiessenJ (2000) Diversity and cohesion: New challenges for the integration of immigrants and minorities. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Available at https://www.coe. int/t/dg3/migration/archives/documentation/Series_Community_eations/DiversityCohesi n_en.pdf.
53.
PattonMQ (2014) Qualitative research and evaluation methods. California: Sage.
54.
RanaSSKarkeeJ (2020) Social cohesion through football: A comparative case study analysis. Global Sports Policy Review1(1): 110–123.
55.
RobinsonDT (1996) Identity and friendship: Affective dynamics and network formation. Advances in Group Processes13: 91–111.
56.
SchinkeRJMcGannonKR (2014) The acculturation experiences of (and with) immigrant athletes. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology12: 64–75.
57.
SDP IWG (2008) Harnessing the power of sport for development and peace: Recommendations to governments. Toronto, ON: Right to Play.
58.
SeyidovI (2021) Understanding social cohesion from the perspective of the host community: Turkey example. Journal of Economy Culture and Society63: 111–125.
59.
SönmezE (2020) Learning culture in effective schools: A case study. Ph.D. Thesis. Martyr University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
60.
SpaaijR (2009) Sport as a vehicle for social mobility and regulation of disadvantaged urban youth.International Review for the Sociology of Sport44(2–3): 247–264.
61.
SpaaijR (2012) Beyond the playing field: Experiences of sport, social capital, and integration among Somalis in Australia. Ethnic and Racial Studies35(9): 1519–1538.
62.
StodolskaMAlexandrisK (2004) The role of recreational sport in the adaptation of first-generation immigrants to the United States. Journal of Leisure Research36(3): 379–413.
63.
SturaC (2019) What makes us strong – the role of sports clubs in facilitating the integration of refugees. European Journal for Sport and Society16(2): 128–145.
64.
SugdenJ (2010) Critical left-realism and sport interventions in divided societies. International Review for the Sociology of Sport45(3): 258–272.
65.
The Presidency of Migration Management of the Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Turkey (2023) Temporary production statistics. Available at https://en.goc.gov.tr/temporary protection27.
66.
TümenS (2023) The case of Syrian refugees in Türkiye: Successes, challenges, and lessons learned. In: JacJ (ed) Background Paper to the World Development Report 2023: Migrants, Refugees, and Societies. Washington DC: World Bank, 1–18.
Van BottenburgMVan SterkenburgJ (2005) The EU and Sport. Matching expectations. Consultation conference with the European Sport Movement on the social functions of sport and the fight against doping. Workshop reports, Brussels 14/15 June.
72.
Van SterkenburgJ (2011) The values and limits of sport-based social interventions in post conflict societies. In: Targeting social cohesion in post-conflict societies through sport. Council of Europe, 11–17. Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/epas/Publications/publications_collection_handbook_en.asp
73.
YehCJInoseM (2003) International students’ reported English fluency, social support satisfaction, and social connectedness as predictors of acculturative stress. Counselling Psychology Quarterly16(1): 15–28.
74.
YinRK (2014) Case study research: Design and methods, 5th Edition California: Sage.
