This article looks at how high-profile individual and collective actors within the worlds of sport and politics seek to advance their views on significant social issues. It focuses on the public debate around the anti-racist actions taken by the England men's football team at Euro 2020 and uses a form of critical discourse analysis to look at how the England manager and players, on one side, and members of the UK Government, on the other, sought to gain and maintain legitimacy for their opposing positions. It also seeks to understand legitimacy as a relational process, by looking at how members of the public and national newspapers responded. Drawing on Strittmatter et al.'s framework of legitimacy, the article examines the subjects, sources, strategies, bases and scenarios of each side's efforts. The article seeks to contribute to a more detailed understanding of political discourse and legitimacy in the context of sport, as well as offering some critical reflections on the nexus of sport and politics.
AgyemangKJ (2012) Black male athlete activism and the link to Michael Jordan: A transformational leadership and social cognitive theory analysis. International Review for the Sociology of Sport47(4): 433–445.
2.
AllsopR (2008) How the left made sport the new battlefield in the culture wars. Institute of Public Affairs Review60(2): 19–22.
3.
BairnerAKellyJLeeJW (eds) (2016) Routledge Handbook of Sport and Politics. London: Taylor & Francis.
BillingsACToweryNASadriSR, et al. (2023) How sports identification compares to political and religious identification: Relationships to violent extremism and radicalization. Sociology of Sport Journal40(1): 11–20.
6.
BrochTBSkilleEÅ (2019) Performing sport political legitimacy: A cultural sociology perspective on sport politics. Sociology of Sport Journal36(2): 171–178.
7.
CammaertsB (2022) The abnormalisation of social justice: The ‘anti-woke culture war’ discourse in the UK. Discourse & Society33(6): 730–743.
8.
CarringtonB (2013) The critical sociology of race and sport: The first fifty years. Annual Review of Sociology39: 79–398.
9.
DeephouseDLBundyJTostLP, et al. (2016) Organizational legitimacy: Six key questions. In: GreenwoodROliverCLawrenceTB, et al. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 27–54.
10.
DelgadoRStefancicJ (2017) Critical Race Theory: An Introduction. New York: NYU Press.
11.
DellmuthLMTallbergJ (2021) Elite communication and the popular legitimacy of international organizations. British Journal of Political Science51(3): 1292–1313.
12.
EdwardsH (2016) The promise and limits of leveraging Black athlete power potential to compel campus change. Journal of Higher Education Athletics & Innovation1(1): 4–13.
13.
FaircloughN (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14.
FaircloughIFaircloughN (2012) Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Taylor & Francis.
FoleyMWEdwardsB (1999) Is it time to disinvest in social capital?Journal of Public Policy19(2): 141–173.
17.
FrederickELPegoraroASandersonJ (2019) Divided and united: Perceptions of athlete activism at the ESPYS. Sport in Society22(12): 1919–1936.
18.
GatesHL (1993) Loose Canons: Notes on the Culture Wars. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
GiftTMinerA (2017) DROPPING THE BALL”: The understudied nexus of sports and politics. World Affairs180(1): 127–161.
20.
GillR (2000) Discourse analysis. In: BauerMWGaskellG (eds) Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound: A Practical Handbook. London: Sage Publications, 172–190.
21.
GrixJ (2017) Sport Politics: An Introduction. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
22.
HardyCThomasR (2015) Discourse in a material world. Journal of Management Studies52(5): 680–696.
23.
HirshonN (2020) Social identity theory in sports fandom research. In: DunnRA (ed.) Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Media Fandom. Hershey: IGI Global, 172–191.
JohnsonCDowdTJRidgewayCL (2006) Legitimacy as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology32: 53–78.
31.
KellyJ (2023) A critical discourse analysis of military-related remembrance rhetoric in UK sport: Communicating consent for British militarism. Communication & Sport11(1): 192–212.
32.
LevermoreRBuddA (2004) Sport and International Relations: An Emerging Relationship. London, New York: Routledge.
33.
LevineMProsserAEvansD, et al. (2005) Identity and emergency intervention: How social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shapes helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin31(4): 443–453.
34.
LinCYLeePCNaiHF (2008) Theorizing the role of sport in state-politics. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Science1(1): 23–32.
35.
MelnickMJJacksonSJ (2002) Globalization American-style and reference idol selection: The importance of athlete celebrity others among New Zealand youth. International Review for the Sociology of Sport37(3-4): 429–448.
36.
MoodyJ (2021) Off the pedestal: The fall of Edward Colston. Public History Review28: 1–5.
37.
MurrayS (2012) The two halves of sports-diplomacy. Diplomacy & Statecraft23(3): 576–592.
38.
NivenD (2021) Who says shut up and dribble? Race and the response to athletes’ political activism. Journal of African American Studies25(2): 298–311.
PelakCF (2005) Athletes as agents of change: An examination of shifting race relations within women’s netball in post-apartheid South Africa. Sociology of Sport Journal22(1): 59–77.
44.
PennRBerridgeD (2018) Football and the military in contemporary Britain: An exploration of invisible nationalism. Armed Forces & Society44(1): 116–138.
45.
PotterJWetherellM (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.
46.
PotterJWetherellMGillR, et al. (1990) Discourse: Noun, verb or social practice?Philosophical Psychology3(2): 205–217.
47.
PutnamRD (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
RichardsonERaglandA (2018) #Staywoke: The language and literacies of the #BlackLivesMatter movement. Community Literacy Journal12(2): 27–56.
50.
RonglanLT (2015) Elite sport in Scandinavian welfare states: Legitimacy under pressure?International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics7(3): 345–363.
51.
RudwickSSchmiedlM (2023) It’s not our problem’: Czech online discourse on kneeling in football and Black lives matter. Sport in Society26(10): 1701–1722.
52.
SandersonJFrederickEStoczM (2016) When athlete activism clashes with group values: Social identity threat management via social media. Mass Communication and Society19(3): 301–322.
53.
SeippelØDalenHBSandvikMR, et al. (2018) From political sports to sports politics: On political mobilization of sports issues. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics10(4): 669–686.
StenlingCSamM (2017) Tensions and contradictions in sport’s quest for legitimacy as a political actor: The politics of Swedish public sport policy hearings. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics9(4): 691–705.
57.
StolowyHGendronYMollJ, et al. (2019) Building the legitimacy of whistleblowers: A multi-case discourse analysis. Contemporary Accounting Research36(1): 7–49.
58.
StrittmatterAMStenlingCFahlénJ, et al. (2018) Sport policy analysis revisited: The sport policy process as an interlinked chain of legitimating acts. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics10(4): 621–635.
59.
SuchmanMC (1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review20(3): 571–610.
60.
TajfelH (1981) Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
