At Title IX’s 50th anniversary we address the contradictions embedded in liberal state reform. This anniversary provides a juncture to consider the limitations of seeking gender liberation through the state. While US law is often credited with revolutionizing athletic access for girls and women, we trace how the state stymied greater transformation efforts. Using poststructuralist and Black feminist state critiques, we show how Title IX utilized an assimilation approach to equity by inviting state domination into women’s sports. This invitation expanded state power across four domains—definitional, protective, surveillance, and economic—which retained rather than disrupted heteropatriarchal, White, capitalist, dominance. We conclude with suggestions to reignite a movement for women's liberation that reimagines gender-equitable sports beyond the state's control for the forthcoming 50 years.
AdamsCLeavittS (2018) ‘It’s just girls’ hockey’: Troubling progress narratives in girls’ and women’s sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport53(2): 152–172.
2.
AhmedSSwanE (2006) Doing diversity. Policy Futures in Education4(2): 96–100.
BrownKJConnollyC (2010) The role of law in promoting women in elite athletics: An examination of four nations. International Review for the Sociology of Sport45(1): 3–21.
7.
BrownW (1992) Finding the man in the state. Feminist Studies18(1): 7–34.
8.
BrownW (1995) States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
BrownW (2019) In The Ruins of Neoliberalism: The Rise of Antidemocratic Politics in the WestNew York: Columbia University Press.
10.
BrownmillerS (2007) Against our will: Men, women, and rape. In: FreedmanEB (ed) The Essential Feminist Reader. New York, NY: Random House, 311–317.
11.
BurkeM (2004) Radicalising liberal feminism by playing the games that men play. Australian Feminist Studies19(44): 169–184.
12.
ButlerJ (2011) Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. New York: Routledge.
13.
BuzuvisEE (2014) Title IX feminism, social justice, and NCAA reform. Freedom Center Journal2014(1): 101–122.
14.
CheslockJ (2008) Who’s playing college sports? Money, race and gender. Women’s Sport Foundation. Available at: http://www.womenssportsfoundation.org(accessed 12 July 2020).
15.
CohenCJ (1997) Punks, bulldaggers, and welfare queens: The radical potential of queer politics?GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies3(4): 437–465.
16.
CrenshawK (1988) Race, reform, and retrenchment: Transformation and legitimation in antidiscrimination law. Harvard Law Review101(7): 1331–1387.
17.
CrenshawK (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum1989: 139–167.
18.
CrenshawK (1991) Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review43(6): 1241–1300.
19.
DonnorJK (2011) Moving beyond Brown: Race and education after Parents v. Seattle School District No. 1. Teachers College Record113(4): 735–754.
20.
EcksteinR (2017) How College Athletics are Hurting Girls’ Sports: The Pay-to-Play Pipeline. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
21.
EdwardsAR (2010) Why sport? The development of sport as a policy issue in Title IX of the education amendments of 1972. Journal of Policy History22(3): 300–336.
22.
FastingK (2015) Assessing the sociology of sport: On sexual harassment research and policy. International Review for the Sociology of Sport50(4–5): 437–441.
23.
FieldsS (2008) Title IX and African-American female athletes. In: LomaxMShropshireK (eds) Sports and the Racial Divide: African-American and Latino Experience in An Era of Change. Jackson: University of Mississippi Press, 126–145.
24.
FischerMMcClearenJ (2020) Transgender athletes and the queer art of athletic failure. Communication & Sport8(2): 147–167.
25.
FoucaultM (1995) Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Vintage.
26.
FraserN (2014) Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York: Routledge.
27.
GemsG (2000) For Pride, Profit, and Patriarchy: Football and the Incorporation of American Cultural Values. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
28.
GuptaNWilcoxS (2021) Transgender students and Title IX: Biden administration signals shift. The National Law ReviewXI(57): 1–1. Available at: https://www.natlawreview.com/article/transgender-students-and-title-ix-biden-administration-signals-shift (accessed 2 August 2021).
29.
HardinMWhitesideEAshE (2014) Ambivalence on the front lines? Attitudes toward Title IX and women's sports among division I sports information directors. International Review for the Sociology of Sport49(1): 42–64.
30.
HarrisCI (1993) Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review106(8): 1707–1791.
31.
HatteryA (2012) They play like girls: Gender and race (In)equity in NCAA sports. Wake Forest Journal of Law & Policy2(1): 247–265.
32.
HextrumK (2020) Bigger, faster, stronger: How racist and sexist ideologies persist in college sports. Gender and Education32(8): 1053–1071.
33.
HextrumK (2021) Special Admission: How College Sports Recruitment Favors White Suburban Athletes. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
34.
HillsLAMaitlandACrostonA, et al. (2020) ‘It’s not like she’s from another planet’: Undoing gender/redoing policy in mixed football. International Review for the Sociology of Sport: 1–19. DOI: 1012690220934753.
35.
JamesJ (1996) Resisting State Violence: Radicalism, Gender, and Race in US Culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
36.
JamesJ (1999) Shadowboxing: Representations of Black Feminist Politics. New York, NY: Palgrave.
37.
KaneMJ (1995) Resistance/transformation of the oppositional binary: Exposing sport as a continuum. Journal of Sport and Social Issues19(2): 191–218.
38.
LapchickR (2020) 2019–2020 College Sport Racial and Gender Report Card. Orlando, FL: University of Central Florida.
39.
MaatzLGravesF (2012) Title IX at 40: Working to Ensure Gender Equity in Education. Washington, DC: National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education.
40.
MathewsonAD (1995) Black women, gender equity and the function at the junction. Marquette Sports Law Journal6(1): 239–266.
41.
MessnerMA (2002) Taking the Field: Women, men and Sports. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
42.
MessnerMA (2009) All for the Kids: Gender, Families, and Youth Sports. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
43.
MessnerMA (2011) Gender ideologies, youth sports, and the production of soft essentialism. Sociology of Sport Journal28(2): 151–170.
44.
MessnerMAMustoM (2016) Introduction. In: MessnerMAMustoM (eds) Child’s Play: Sport in Kids’ Worlds. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1–19.
45.
MilnerANBraddock JHII (2016) Sex Segregation in Sports: Why Separate is not Equal. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
46.
MustoMCookyCMessnerMA (2017) “From Fizzle to Sizzle!” televised sports news and the production of gender-bland sexism. Gender & Society31(5): 573–596.
47.
National Federation of State High School Associations (NFHS) (2020) 2018–2019 high school athletics participation survey results. Report, Indianapolis, n.d.
48.
NCAA Office of Inclusion (2011) NCAA inclusion of transgender student-athletes. Report, Indianapolis, August.
49.
Nyong’oT (2010) The unforgivable transgression of being Caster Semenya. Women & Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory20(1): 95–100.
50.
O’Bannon v. NCAA (2015) No.14-16601, US Court of Appeals, 9th Cir.
51.
Office of Civil Rights [OCR] (1979, December 11) A policy interpretation: Title IX and intercollegiate athletics. Available at: https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/t9interp.html (accessed 2 August 2021).
52.
OgilvieMFMcCormackM (2020) Gender-collaborative training in elite university sport: Challenging gender essentialism through integrated training in gender-segregated sports. International Review for the Sociology of Sport: 1–17. DOI: 1012690220980149.
53.
OwtonHSparkesAC (2017) Sexual abuse and the grooming process in sport: Learning from Bella’s story. Sport, Education and Society22(6): 732–743.
54.
ParentSFortierK (2018) Comprehensive overview of the problem of violence against athletes in sport. Journal of Sport & Social Issues42(4): 227–246.
55.
PhippsC (2021) Thinking beyond the binary: Barriers to trans*participation in university sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport56(1): 81–96.
56.
RothsteinR (2017) The Color of law: A Forgotten History of how our Government Segregated America. New York, NY: Liveright.
57.
SaboDVelizP (2008) Go out and Play: Youth Sports in America. East Meadow, NY: Women’s Sports Foundation.
58.
SandlerBR (2007) Title IX: How we got it and what a difference it made. Cleveland State law Review55(40): 473–489.
59.
SmithAM (2008) Neoliberalism, welfare policy, and feminist theories of social justice: Feminist theory special issue: Feminist theory and welfare. Feminist Theory9(2): 131–144.
60.
StaurowskyEJWatanabeNCooperJ, et al. (2020) Chasing Equity: The Triumphs, Challenges, and Opportunities in Sports for Girls and Women. New York, NY: Women’s Sports Foundation.
61.
SuggsW (2005) A Place on the Team: The Triumph and Tragedy of Title IX. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
62.
SullivanCF (2011) Gender verification and gender policies in elite sport: Eligibility and “fair play”. Journal of Sport and Social Issues35(4): 400–419.
63.
TitleIXof the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 USC. §1681–1688.
64.
TraversA (2013) Thinking the unthinkable: Imagining an “un-American,” girl-friendly, women-and trans-inclusive alternative for baseball. Journal of Sport and Social Issues37(1): 78–96.
65.
WhitesideERoessnerA (2018) Forgotten and left behind: Political apathy and privilege at Title IX’s 40th anniversary. Communication & Sport6(1): 3–24.
66.
YoungIM (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
67.
YoungIM (2003) The logic of masculinist protection: Reflections on the current security state. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society29(1): 1–25.
