Capoeira is an Afro-Brazilian bodily discipline that has now become a global phenomenon. In 2014 the cultural significance of capoeira was recognized on the world stage when it was awarded the special protected status of an ‘Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity’ by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation. In the application to this organisation, and in wider advertising material and practitioner literature, capoeira is celebrated as a practice that promotes social cohesion, inclusivity, integration, racial equality and resistance to all forms of oppression. This paper seeks to problematize this inclusive discourse, exploring the extent to which it is both supported and contradicted in the gendered discourses and practices of specific capoeira groups in Europe. Drawing upon ethnographic data, produced through two sets of ethnographic research and the researchers’ 24 years of combined experience as capoeira players, this paper documents the complex and contradictory contexts in which discourses and practices of gender inclusivity are at once promoted and undermined.
AlmeidaB (1986) Capoeira: A Brazilian Art Form: History, Philosophy, and Practice. Berkeley, CA:North Atlantic Books.
2.
AlmeidaMJosephJPalmaA, et al. (2013) Marketing strategies within an African-Brazilian martial art. Sport in Society: Cultures, Commerce, Media, Politics16(10): 1346–1359.
3.
AssunçãoMR (2004) Capoeira: The History of an Afro-Brazilian Martial Art. Berkeley, CA: Routledge.
BerggrenK (2014) Sticky masculinity: Post-structuralism, phenomenology and subjectivity in critical studies on men. Men and Masculinities17(3): 231–252.
6.
CapoeiraN (2002) Capoeira: Roots of the Dance-Fight-Game. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.
7.
ChannonA (2014) Towards the ‘undoing’ of gender in mixed-sex martial arts and combat sports. Societies4(4): 587–605.
8.
ChannonADashperKFletcherT, et al. (2016) The promises and pitfalls of sex integration in sport and physical culture. Sport in Society: Cultures, Commerce, Media, Politics19(8–9): 1111–1124.
9.
ChristensenAJensenSQ (2014) Combining hegemonic masculinity and intersectionality. NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies9(1): 60–75.
10.
CrocketH (2012) ‘This is men’s ultimate’: (Re) creating multiple masculinities in elite open Ultimate Frisbee. International Review for the Sociology of Sport48(3): 318–333.
11.
DeaconR (2000) Theory as practice: Foucault’s concept of problematization. Telos2000(118): 127–142.
12.
De Campos RosarioCStephensNDelamontS (2010) ‘I’m your teacher, I’m Brazilian!’ Authenticity and authority in European capoeira. Sport, Education and Society15(1): 103–120.
13.
DelamontS (2005) No place for women among them? Reflections on the axé of fieldwork. Sport, Education and Society10(3): 305–320.
14.
DelamontS (2006) The smell of sweat and rum: Teacher authority in capoeira classes. Ethnography and Education1(2): 161–175.
15.
DelamontSStephensNCamposC (2017) Embodying Brazil: An Ethnography of Diasporic Capoeira. London: Routledge.
16.
DowneyG (2005) Learning Capoeira: Lessons in Cunning from an Afro-Brazilian Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
De Martini UgolottiN (2015) Climbing walls, making bridges: children of immigrants’ identity negotiations through capoeira and Parkour in Turin. Leisure Studies34(1): 19–33.
18.
De Martini UgolottiNMoyerE (2016) “If I climb a wall of ten meters”: Capoeira, Parkour and the politics of public space among (post)migrant youth in Turin, Italy. Patterns of Prejudice50(2): 188–206.
19.
DowneyGDalidowiczMMasonPH (2015) Apprenticeship as method: Embodied learning in ethnographic practice. Qualitative Research15(2): 183–200.
20.
ElliottK (2016) Caring masculinities: Theorizing an emerging concept. Men and Masculinities19(3): 240–259.
21.
EssienA (2008) Capoeira Beyond Brazil: From a Slave Tradition to an International Way of Life. Berkeley, CA: Blue Snake Books.
22.
FoucaultM (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.
23.
FoucaultM (1978) The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction. New York: Random House.
24.
FoucaultM (1980) The eye of power. In: GordonC (ed.) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977 by Michel Foucault. Sussex: Harvester Press, pp. 146–165.
25.
FoucaultM (1984a) Polemics, politics, and problematizations. In: RabinowP (ed.) The Foucault Reader: An Introduction to Foucault’s Thought. London: Penguin Books, pp. 381–390.
26.
FoucaultM (1984b) Truth and power. In: RabinowP (ed.) The Foucault Reader: An Introduction to Foucault’s Thought. London: Penguin Books, pp. 51–75.
27.
FuggleS (2008) Discourses of subversion: The ethics and aesthetics of capoeira and parkour. Dance Research26(2): 204–222.
28.
GarlickS (2002) The beauty of friendship: Foucault, masculinity and the work of art. Philosophy Social Criticism28: 558–577.
29.
GuizardiMLYpeijA (2016) ‘Being Carried Out’: Women’s bodies and masculinity inside and outside the capoeira ring. In: FranksGYpeijAKonigRS (eds) Gender and Conflict: Embodiments, Discourses and Symbolic Practices. London: Routledge, pp. 175–192.
30.
HookD (2001) Discourse, knowledge, materiality, history: Foucault and discourse analysis. Theory & Psychology11: 521–547.
31.
JosephJ (2008a) ‘Going to Brazil’: Transnational and corporeal movements of a Canadian-Brazilian martial arts community. Global Networks8(2): 194–213.
32.
JosephJ (2008b) The logical paradox of the cultural commodity: Selling an ‘authentic’ Afro-Brazilian martial art in Canada. Sociology of Sport Journal25(4): 498–515.
33.
JosephJ (2012) The practice of capoeira: Diasporic black culture in Canada. Ethnic and Racial Studies35(6): 1078–1095.
34.
KingDK (1988) Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a Black feminist ideology. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society14(1): 42–72.
35.
LewisJL (1992) Ring of Liberation: Deceptive Discourse in Brazilian Capoeira. London: University of Chicago Press.
36.
LewisJL (2000) Sex and violence in Brazil: Carnival, capoeira, and the problem of everyday life. American Ethnologist26(3): 539–557.
37.
MacLennanJ (2011) ‘To build a beautiful dialogue’: Capoeira as contradiction. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication4(2): 146–162.
38.
MartinoW (1999) ‘Cool Boys’, ‘Party Animals’, ‘Squids’ and ‘Poofters’: Interrogating the dynamics and politics of adolescent masculinities in school. British Journal of Sociology of Education20(2): 239–263.
39.
MerrellF (2007) Capoeira and Candomblé: Conformity and Resistance through Afro-Brazilian Experience. Princeton, NJ: Markus Wiener.
40.
PringleR (2005) Masculinities, sport and power: A critical comparison of Gramscian and Foucauldian inspired theoretical tools. Journal of Sport & Social Issues29: 256–274.
41.
PringleRHickeyC (2010) Negotiating masculinities via the moral problematization of sport. Sociology of Sport Journal27(2): 115–138.
42.
PringleRMarkulaP (2005) No pain is sane after all: A Foucauldian analysis of masculinities and men’s experiences in rugby. Sociology of Sport Journal22: 472–497.
43.
RichA (1983) Sources. Woodside, CA: Heyeck Press.
44.
RichardsonL (1994) Writing: A method of inquiry. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: SAGE, pp. 516–529.
RobitailleL (2014) PromotingCapoeira, branding Brazil: A focus on the semantic body. Black Music Research Journal34(2): 229–254.
47.
StephensNDelamontS (2009) They start to get malicia: Teaching tacit and technical knowledge. British Journal of Sociology of Education30(5): 537–548.
48.
StephensNDelamontS (2013) ‘I can see it in the nightclub’: Dance, capoeira and male bodies. The Sociological Review62(1): 149–166.
49.
TamboukouMA (2013) A Foucauldian approach to narratives. In: AndrewsMSquireCTamboukouM (eds) Doing Narrative Research. 2nd ed.London: SAGE, pp. 102–120.
50.
TaylorG (2007) Capoeira: The Jogo de Angola from Luanda to Cyberspace (vol. 2). Berkeley, CA: Blue Snake Books.
51.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) (2014) Nomination file no. 00892 for inscription on the representative list of the intangible cultural heritage of humanity in 2014 (Session nine). UNESCO, Paris, November.
52.
VerlooMLombardoE (2007) Contested gender equality and policy variety in Europe: Introducing a critical frame analysis approach. In: VerlooM (ed.) Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality: A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press, pp. 21–49.
WoodwardK (2014) Legacies of 2012: Putting women’s boxing into discourse. Contemporary Social Science: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences9(2): 242–252.
