Over the last two decades, the Finnish community of dog agility practitioners has worked diligently towards gaining recognition for agility as a sport. The process reached an important milestone in 2016 when the National Sports Council listed the Finnish Agility Association as eligible for financial support from the state. As one of the pioneer countries in this regard, Finland is of great interest, as the agility sport continues to become more popular and professionalised worldwide. Using the findings from a qualitative study of media coverage and expert interviews about attempts to gain recognition for agility as a sport, this article explores the strategies that practitioners and the Finnish Agility Association have utilised in their work. This article shows that recognition comes with the need to find a balance between elite sports, on the one hand, and sport for all on the other. Although agility may risk losing some of its particular character as a human–animal teamwork dynamic, it has the potential to contribute to the culture of sports more widely.
AdjepongA (2015) ‘We’re, like, a cute rugby team’: How whiteness and heterosexuality shape women’s sense of belonging in rugby. International Review for the Sociology of Sport59(2): 209–222.
2.
AtkinsonM (2010) Entering scapeland: Yoga, fell and post-sport physical cultures. Sport in Society13(7–8): 1249–1267.
3.
AtkinsonMYoungK (2005) Reservoir dogs: Greyhound racing, mimesis and sports-related violence. International Review for the Sociology of Sport40(4): 335–356.
4.
BaileyRTalbotM (eds) (2015) Elite Sport and Sport-for-All: Bridging the Two Cultures. London; New York: Routledge.
5.
BaumanAERussellSJFurberSE. (2001) The epidemiology of dog walking: An unmet need for human and canine health. Medical Journal of Australia175(11–12): 632–634.
6.
BealB (2001) Disqualifying the official. An exploration of social resistance through the subculture of skateboarding. In: YiannakisAMelnickMJ (eds) Contemporary Issues in Sociology of Sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers, pp. 47–57.
7.
BrandomR (2009) Reason in Philosophy: Animating Ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
CoakleyJ (2001) Sport in Society: Issues and Controversies. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
CollinsM (2010) From ‘sport for good’ to ‘sport for sport’s sake’ – Not a good move for sports development in England?International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics2(3): 367–379.
10.
CollinsS (2011) Finland. In: NicholsonMHoyeRHoulihanB (eds) Participation in Sport: International Policy Perspectives. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 109–125.
11.
CrocketH (2015) Foucault, flying discs and calling fouls: Ascetic practices of the self in Ultimate Frisbee. Sociology of Sport Journal32(1): 89–105.
12.
CrocketH (2016) Tie-dye shirts and compression leggings: An examination of cultural tensions within Ultimate Frisbee via dress. Annals of Leisure Research19(1): 192–211.
13.
CuttHGiles-CortiBKnuimanM. (2007) Dog ownership, health and physical activity: A critical review of the literature. Health & Place13(1): 261–272.
14.
FaircloughN (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
15.
FraserNHonnethA (2003) Recognition or Redistribution? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. London; New York: Verso Books.
16.
GilbertMGillettJ (2012) Equine athletes and interspecies sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport47(5): 632–643.
17.
GilchristaPWheatonB (2011) Lifestyle sport, public policy and youth engagement: Examining the emergence of parkour. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics3(1): 109–131.
18.
GillettJGilbertM (eds) (2014) Sport, Animals, and Society. New York: Routledge.
19.
GriggsG (2009) ‘When a ball dreams, it dreams it’s a Frisbee’: The emergence of aesthetic appreciation within Ultimate Frisbee. Sport in Society12(10): 1317–1326.
20.
GriggsG (2011) ‘This must be the only sport in the world where most of the players don’t know the rules’: Operationalizing self-refereeing and the spirit of the game in UK Ultimate Frisbee. Sport in Society14(1): 97–110.
21.
HarawayD (2003) The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.
22.
HargreavesJ (1994) Sporting Females: Critical Issues in the History and Sociology of Women’s Sport. London; New York: Routledge.
23.
HeadeyB (1999) Health benefits and health cost savings due to pets: Preliminary estimates from an Australian national survey. Social Indicators Research47(2): 233–243.
24.
HeiniläK (1971) Social meanings of sport for all. In: OjaPTelamaR (eds) Sport for All. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 439–445.
25.
Helsingin Sanomat (2007) Agility löi Niemisen ja Poutiaisen. Helsingin Sanomat (Sport news), 7January.
26.
IkäheimoH (2002) On the genus and species of recognition. Inquiry45: 447–462.
27.
IkonenH-MPehkonenS‘I <3 my high-performance dog’: Love for the sport in agility coach representations in social media. Unpublished Manuscript.
28.
JarvieG (2009) Identity, recognition or redistribution through sport? In: HarrisJParkerA (eds) Sport and Social Identities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 15–28.
29.
JenningsLB (1997) Potential benefits of pet ownership in health promotion. Journal of Holistic Nursing15(4): 358–372.
30.
LundG (2014) Taking teamwork seriously: The sport of dog agility as an ethical model of cross-species companionship. In: GillettJGilbertM (eds) Sport, Animals, and Society. London: Routledge, pp. 127–139.
31.
McFeeG (2004) Sport, Rules and Values: Philosophical Investigations into the Nature of Sport. London: Routledge.
32.
McNicholasJGilbeyARennieA. (2005) Pet ownership and human health: A brief review of evidence and issues. BMJ331: 1252–1254.
33.
MarkulaP (ed.) (2009) Olympic Women and the Media: International Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
PfisterG (2015) Assessing the sociology of sport: On women and football. International Review for the Sociology of Sport50(4–5): 563–569.
36.
RinehartRE (2000) Emerging Arriving sport: Alternatives to formal sport. In: CoakleyJJDunningE (eds) Handbook of Sport Studies. London: SAGE, pp. 504–520.
37.
RintalaH (2016) Koiran selkä ei kestä päällä istumista. Verona Blog. Available at: https://veroblogit.com/ (accessed 19 April 2016).
38.
SchuurmanN (2014) Blogging situated emotions in human–horse relationships. Emotion, Space and Society13(4): 1–8.
39.
SteadD (2008) Sport and the media. In: HoulihanB (ed.) Sport and Society: A Student Introduction. London: SAGE, pp. 184–200.
40.
TaylorC (1994) The politics of recognition. In: GutmannA (ed.) Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 25–73.
41.
TaylorS (2001) Locating and conducting discourse analytic research. In: WetherellMTaylorS (eds) Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis. Milton Keynes: Open University, pp. 5–48.
42.
VamplewW (2016) Still crazy after all those years: Continuity in a changing labour market for professional jockeys. Sport in Society19(3): 378–399.
43.
WheatonBBealB (2003) ‘Keeping It real’: Subcultural media and the discourses of authenticity in alternative sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport38(2): 155–176.
44.
YLE (2015a) Aloittelija testasi agilityn – koiran sijasta ensin mokasi ihminen. YLE Uutiset, 20July. Available at: yle.fi/uutiset/3-8146263 (accessed 19 April 2016).
45.
YLE (2015b) Onko agilityllä viimein toivoa päästä urheilulajiksi? Shakki ja tikanheitto ovat jo. YLE Uutiset, 18December. Available at: yle.fi/uutiset/3-8536739 (accessed 19 April 2016).
