Same same,but different? Exploring the organizational identities of Swedish voluntary sports: Possible implications of sports clubs’ self-identification for their role as implementers of policy objectives
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2016
Same same,but different? Exploring the organizational identities of Swedish voluntary sports: Possible implications of sports clubs’ self-identification for their role as implementers of policy objectives
The aim of this study is to contribute to the ongoing discussion of sports clubs’ propensity to act as policy implementers. Theoretically, we conceptualize this propensity as contingent on an alignment between a sports club’s organizational identity and the cultural material, that is, ends and means of a given policy. Building on data from short, qualitative interviews with representatives of 218 randomly selected sports clubs, we construct 10 organizational identity categories. Between these categories, there is a variety of clubs’ core purposes, practices and logics of action. The implications of this heterogeneity, in terms of sports clubs’ propensity to act as policy implementers, is discussed with reference to what clubs in each category might ‘imagine doing’. Also discussed are three avenues by which institutional conditions might affect the formation and change of sports clubs’ organizational identity, in turn having implications for their role as implementers.
AdamsA (2011) Between modernization and mutual aid: The changing perceptions of voluntary sports clubs in England. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics3: 23–43.
2.
AmisJSlackTHiningsB (2002) Values and organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science38: 436–465.
3.
CoalterF (2007) A Wider Social Role for Sport: Who’s Keeping the Score?London: Routledge.
4.
DiMaggioPJPowellWW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review48: 147–160.
5.
FahlénJKarpS (2010) Access denied: The new ‘sports for all’—Programme in Sweden and the reinforcement of the ‘sports performance’—Logic. Sport & EU Review2: 3–22.
6.
FahlénJEliassonIWickmanK (2014) Resisting self-regulation: An analysis of sport policy programme making and implementation in Sweden. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics. Epub ahead of print 31July2014. DOI: 10.1080/19406940.2014.925954.
7.
Fox-WolfgrammSJBoalKBHuntJG (1998) Organizational adaptation to institutional change: A comparative study of first-order change in prospector and defender banks. Administrative Science Quarterly43: 87–126.
8.
GarrettR (2004) The response of voluntary sports clubs to Sport England’s Lottery funding: Cases of compliance, change and resistance. Managing Leisure9: 13–29.
9.
GioiaDAThomasJB (1996) Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly41: 370–403.
10.
GioiaDAPatvardhanSDHamiltonAL. (2013) Organizational identity formation and change. The Academy of Management Annals7: 123–192.
11.
GlynnMA (2000) When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organization Science11: 285–298.
12.
GlynnMA (2008) Beyond constraint: How institutions enable identities. In: GreenwoodROliverCSahlinK. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: SAGE, pp. 413–430.
13.
HallPATaylorRC (1996) Political science and the three new institutionalisms*. Political Studies44(5): 936–957.
14.
HarrisSMoriKCollinsM (2009) Great expectations: Voluntary sports clubs and their role in delivering national policy for English sport. Voluntas20: 405–423.
15.
Heritage Foundation (2012) 2012 Index of economic freedom: Graph the data—Sweden. Available at: www.heritage.org/index/visualize
16.
HiningsCRThibaultLSlackTKikulisL (1996) Values and organizational structure. Human Relations49: 885–916.
17.
IbsenBSeippelØ (2010) Voluntary organized sport in Denmark and Norway. Sport in Society13(4): 593–608.
18.
KeatRASamMP (2013) Regional implementation of New Zealand sport policy: New instrument, new challenges. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics5: 39–54.
19.
KingBGClemensESFryM (2011) Identity realization and organizational forms: Differentiation and consolidation of identities among Arizona’s charter schools. Organization Science22: 554–572.
20.
KraatzMABlockES (2008) Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In: GreenwoodROliverCSahlinK. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: SAGE, pp. 243–275.
21.
KroezenJJHeugensPP (2012) Organizational identity formation: Processes of identity imprinting and enactment in the Dutch microbrewing land-scape. In: SchultzMMaguireSLangleyA. (eds) Constructing Identity in and Around Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 89–127.
22.
KvaleSBrinkmannS (2008) InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Interviewing. 2nd ed.London: SAGE.
23.
MarchJG (1981) Decision in organizations and theories of choice. In: Van de VenAJoyceWF (eds) Perspectives of Organizational Design and Behavior. New York: Wiley, pp. 205–244.
24.
MayTHarrisSCollinsM (2012) Implementing community sport policy: Understanding the variety of voluntary club types and their attitudes to policy. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics5(3): 397–419.
25.
MilesMBHubermanAM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
26.
NicholsGPadmoreJTaylorP. (2012) The relationship between types of sports club and English government policy to grow participation. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics4(2): 187–200.
27.
O’GormanJ (2011) Where is the implementation in sport policy and programme analysis? The English Football Association’s charter standard as an illustration. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics3: 85–108.
Riksidrottsförbundet [Swedish Sports Confederation] (2010) Idrotts-Sverige. En Presentation av Riksidrottsförbundet [Sports in Sweden – A Presentation of the Swedish Sports Confederation]. Stockholm: Riksidrottsförbundet.
30.
Riksidrottsförbundet [Swedish Sports Confederation] (2012) Idrotten i Siffror [The Statistics of Swedish Sports]. Stockholm: Riksidrottsförbundet.
31.
SeippelØ (2003) Norske Idrettslag 2002. Kunnskap, Ledelse og Styring [Norwegian Sports Clubs 2002: Knowledge, management, and governance]. Rapport 2003:7 [Report 2003:7]. Oslo: Institutt for Samfunnsforskning.
32.
SkilleEÅ (2009) State sport policy and voluntary sport clubs: The case of the Norwegian Sports City Program as social policy. European Sport Management Quarterly9: 63–79.
33.
SkilleEÅ (2010) Competitiveness and health: The work of sport clubs as seen by sport clubs representatives—A Norwegian case study. International Review for the Sociology of Sport45(1): 73–85.
34.
SkilleEÅ (2011) The conventions of sport clubs: Enabling and constraining the implementation of social goods through sport. Sport, Education and Society16(2): 241–253.
35.
SlackTHiningsB (1994) Institutional pressures and isomorphic change: An empirical test. Organization Studies15: 803–827.
36.
StenlingC (2013) The introduction of drive-in sport in community sport organizations as an example of organizational non-change. Journal of Sport Management27: 497–509.
37.
StenlingC (2014) Sport programme implementation as translation and organizational identity construction: The implementation of drive-in sport in Swedish sports as an illustration. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics6(1): 55–69.
38.
Straandgaard-PedersenJDobbinF (2006) In search of identity and legitimation: Bridging organizational culture and neoinstitutionalism. American Behavioral Scientist49: 897–906.
WeedMRobinsonLDownwardP. (2005) Academic Review of the Role of Voluntary Sports Clubs. Loughborough: Institute of Sport and Leisure Policy.
41.
WijkströmFLundströmT (2002) Den Ideella Sektorn—Organisationerna i det Civila Samhället [The Voluntary Sector: Organisations in the Civil Society]. Stockholm: Sober.
