To date Luce Irigaray’s sexual difference theory has had very little impact on sport feminism studies. While sexual difference is still considered in some feminist circles as a regression to the old idea of anatomy as destiny, Irigaray’s sexual difference theory is more about criticizing the universal male subject and creating the possibility of female subjectivity. Irigaray’s work is focused on language and normative categories. Using Irigaray’s sexual difference theory to analyse and represent women’s rugby experiences allows us to go beyond the difference between biological sexes. It concentrates on difference amongst women and within a fragmented and contradictory female subject. To represent these experiences, a creative non-fictional personal narrative is used.
BraidottiR (1991) Patters of Dissonance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
3.
BraidottiR (1997) Sexual difference theory. In: JaggarAMYoungIM (eds) A Companion to Feminist Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 298–306.
4.
BraidottiR (2003) Becoming woman: Or sexual difference revisited. Theory, Culture and Society20: 43–64.
5.
BroadKL (2001) The gendered unapologetic: Queer resistance in women’s sport. Sociology of Sport Journal18: 181–204.
6.
BruceT (2000) Never let the bastard see you cry. Sociology of Sport Journal17: 69–74.
7.
CarleANaurightJ (1999) Crossing the line: Women playing rugby union. In: ChandlerTJLNaurightJ (eds) Making the Rugby World: Race, Gender, Commerce. London: Frank Cass, 128–148.
8.
CasseyD (1999) Luce Irigaray and the advent of the divine: From the metaphysical to the symbolic to the eschatological. Pacifica12: 27–54.
9.
CaulleyDN (2008) Making qualitative research reports less boring: The techniques of writing creative nonfiction. Qualitative Inquiry14: 424–449.
10.
ChaseL (2006) (Un)disciplined bodies: A Foucauldian analysis of women’s rugby. Sociology of Sport Journal23: 229–247.
11.
CliffordJ (1986) Introduction: Partial truths. In: CliffordJMarcusGE (eds) Writing Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1–26.
CollinF (2006) Praxis de la Diferencia. Zaragoza: Icaria.
14.
ConnellRW (1995) Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
De LauretisT (1987) Technologies of Gender. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
16.
DenisonJ (1996) Sport narratives. Qualitative Inquiry2: 351–362.
17.
DenisonJRinehartR (2000) Introduction. Sociology of Sport Journal17: 1–4.
18.
DenzinNK (1994) The art and politics of interpretation. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 500–515.
19.
DenzinNK (1997) Interpretative Ethnography: Ethnographic Practices for the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
20.
DenzinNK (2003) Performance Ethnography. Critical Pedagogy and the Politics of Culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
21.
DenzinNKLincolnYS (2005) Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1–32.
22.
DeutscherP (2002) A Politics of Impossible Difference. London: Cornell University Press.
23.
DunningE (1986) Sport as a male preserve: Notes on the social sources of masculine identity and its transformations. Theory, Culture and Society3: 79–90.
24.
EllisCBochnerADenzinNKLincolnYMorseJRonaldPRichardsonL (2008) Talking and thinking about qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry14: 254–284.
25.
FlahertyMGDenzinNKManningPKSnowDA (2002) Review symposium: Crisis in representation. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography31: 478–516.
26.
FoucaultM (1998) What is an author? In: FaubionJD (ed.) Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology. New York: The New Press, 205–222.
27.
FussDJ (1992) ‘Essentially speaking’: Luce Irigaray’s language of essence. In: FraserNBartkySL (eds) Revaluing French Feminism. Critical Essays on Difference, Agency & Culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 94–112.
28.
GerardP (1996) Creative Nonfiction. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
29.
GillF (2007) ‘Violent’ femininity: Women rugby players and gender negotiation. Women’s Studies International Forum30: 416–426.
InaharaM (2009) This body which is not one: The body, femininity and disability. Body Society15: 15–47.
32.
IrigarayL (1985a) Speculum, of the Other Woman. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Original work published 1974.)
33.
IrigarayL (1985b) This Sex Which Is Not One. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Original work published 1977.)
34.
IvesK (1996) Cixous Irigaray Kristeva. The Jouissance of French Feminism. Worcestershire: Crescent Moon.
35.
JonesR (2006) Dilemmas, maintaining ‘face’, and paranoia: An average coaching. Qualitative Inquiry12: 1012–1021.
36.
MarkulaP (2003) Bodily dialogues: Writing the self. In: DenisonJMarkulaP (eds) Moving Writing: Crafting Movement in Sport Research. New York: Peter Lang, 51–76.
37.
MarkulaPDenisonJ (2005) Sport and the personal narrative. In: AndrewsDMasonDS (eds) Qualitative Methods in Sport Studies. Oxford: Berg, 165–184.
38.
McConnellR (2001) Rugby. In ChristensenKGuttmannAPfisterG (eds) International Encyclopedia of Women and Sports. New York: Macmillan, 958–962.
39.
OlkowskiD (2000) The end of phenomenology: Bergson’s interval in Irigaray. Hypatia15: 73–91.
40.
PolkinghorneDE (1995) Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education8: 5–23.
RichardsonL (2000) New writing practices in qualitative research. Sociology of Sport Journal17: 5–20.
43.
RichardsonLSt PierreEA (2005) Writing: A method of inquiry. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 959–978.
44.
SchorN (1994) This essentialism which is not one: Coming to grips with Irigaray. In: BurkeCSchorNWhitfordM (eds) Engaging with Irigaray. New York: Columbia University Press, 57–78.
45.
SchwabG (2007) Reading Irigaray (and her readers) in the twenty first century. In: CimitileMCMillerEP (eds) Returning to Irigaray. Feminist Philosophy, Politics and the Question of Unity. Albany: State University of New York Press, 25–50.
46.
SheardKGDunningEG (1973) The rugby football club as a type of ‘male preserve’: Some sociological notes. International Review for the Sociology of Sport8: 5–24.
47.
SjöholmC (2000) Crossing lovers: Luce Irigaray’s elemental passions. Hypatia15: 92–112.
48.
SmithBSparkesA (2009) Narrative inquiry in sport and exercise psychology: What can it mean, and why might we do it?Psychology of Sport and Exercise10: 1–11.
49.
SparkesA (2002) Telling Tales in Sport and Physical Activity. A Qualitative Journey. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
50.
SparkesA (2004) Bodies, narratives, selves, autobiographies: The example of Lance Armstrong. Journal of Sport and Social Issues28: 397–428.
WeedonC (1997) Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
53.
WheatleyEE (1994) Subcultural subversions: Comparing discourses on sexuality in men’s and women’s rugby songs. In: BirrellSColeC (eds) Women, Sport and Culture. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 193–212.
