Dunning, E. (1992) ‘Figurational Sociology and the Sociology of Sport: Some Concluding Remarks’, in E. Dunning and C. Rojek (eds) Sport and Leisure in the Civilizing Process: Critique and Counter-Critique, pp. 220-284. Basingstoke: Macmillan .
2.
Dunning, E. , Malcolm, D. and Waddington, I. (2004) ‘Introduction’, in E. Dunning , D. Malcolm and I. Waddington (eds) Sport Histories: Figurational Studies in the Development of Modern Sports, pp. 1-14. London: Routledge .
3.
Elias, N. (1986) ‘An Essay on Sport and Violence’, in N. Elias and E. Dunning, Quest for Excitement. Oxford: Basil Blackwell .
4.
Malcolm, D. (2002) ‘Cricket and Civilizing Processes: A Response to Stokvis’ , International Review for the Sociology of Sport37(1): 37-57 .
5.
Malcolm, D. (2004) ‘Cricket: Civilizing and De-civilizing Processes in the Imperial Game’, in E. Dunning , D. Malcolm and I. Waddington (eds) Sport Histories: Figurational Studies in the Development of Modern Sports, pp. 71-87. London: Routledge .
6.
Malcolm, D. (2005) ‘The Emergence, Codification and Diffusion of Sport: Theoretical and Conceptual Issues’ , International Review for the Sociology of Sport40(1): 115-118 .
7.
Sheard, K. (2004) ‘Boxing in the Western Civilizing Process’, in E. Dunning , D. Malcolm and I. Waddington (eds) Sport Histories: Figurational Studies in the Development of Modern Sports, pp. 15-30. London: Routledge .
8.
Stokvis, R. (1992) ‘Sports and Civilization: Is Violence the Central Problem?’ in E. Dunning and C. Rojek (eds) Sport and Leisure in the Civilizing Process: Critique and Counter-Critique, pp. 121-136. Basingstoke: Macmillan .
9.
Stokvis, R. (2005) ‘The Civilizing Process Applied to Sports: A Response to Dominic Malcolm — Cricket and civilizing processes . International Review for the Sociology of Sport40(1): 111-114 .
