Studies in the sociology of sport have found that the higher one's social class, the greater is one's overall involvement in sports, but the less likely is one's involvement in what have come to be called `prole' sports. Using data from the 1993 General Social Survey, this study tests two explanations for this paradox, one stressing class-based differences in cultural capital and the other emphasizing class-based differences in economic capital. Findings show that those who are richest in cultural capital and those richest in economic capital are most likely to be involved in sports generally, and that these tendencies are independent of one another. However, those richest in cultural capital are least likely to be involved in `prole' sports, and economic capital has no bearing on `prole' sports involvement. In all, cultural capital explains the paradox of social class and sports involvement better than economic capital does. Inferences are drawn for the role of sports involvement in the reproduction of social inequality, and for the `cultural omnivore' thesis.
Aveni, A.F. (1976) `Alternative Stratification Systems: The Case of Interpersonal Respect among Leisure Participants', Sociological Quarterly17: 53-64.
2.
Booth, D. and Loy, J. (1999) `Sport, Status, and Style', Sport History Review30: 1-26.
3.
Bourdieu, P. (1978) `Sport and Social Class', Social Science Information17: 819-840.
4.
Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Tast, trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Bryson, B. (1996) `“Anything but Heavy Metal”: Symbolic Exclusion and Musical Dislikes', American Sociological Review61: 884-899.
6.
Coakley, J.J. (1998) Sport in Society (6th edn). Boston, MA: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
7.
Collins, R. (1979) The Credential Society: An Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification. New York: Academic Press.
8.
Curry, T.J. and Jiobu, R.M. (1984) Sports: A Social Perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9.
Curtis, J.E. and Milton, B.G. (1976) `Social Status and “The Active Society”: National Data on Correlates of Leisure-Time Physical and Sport Activities', in R.S. Gruneau and J.G. Albinson (eds) Canadian Sport: Sociological Perspectives, pp. 303-329. Don Mills, Ontario: Addison-Wesley.
10.
Davis, J.A. and Smith, T.W. (1998) General Social Surveys, 1972-1998 [machine-readable data file]. Principal investigator, James A Davis; director and co-principal investigator, Tow W. Smith; coprincipal investigator, Peter V. Marsden. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center.
11.
DiMaggio, P. (1982) `Cultural Capital and School Success: The Impact of Status Culture Participation on the Grades of U.S. High School Students', American Sociological Review47: 189-201.
12.
DiMaggio, P. (1987) `Classification in Art', American Sociological Review52: 440-455.
13.
DiMaggio, P. and Mohr, J. (1985) `Cultural Capital, Educational Attainment and Marital Selection', American Journal of Sociology90: 1231-1261.
14.
DiMaggio, P. and Ostrower, F. (1990) `Participation in the Arts by Black and White Americans', Social Forces68: 753-778.
15.
DiMaggio, P. and Useem, M. (1978) `Social Class and Arts Consumption: The Origins and Consequences of Class Differences in Exposure to the Arts in America', Theory and Society5: 141-161.
16.
Douglas, M. and Isherwood, B. (1979) The World of Goods. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Eitzen, S.D. (1996) `Classism in Sport: The Powerless Bear the Burden', Journal of Sport and Social Issues20: 95-105.
18.
Eitzen, S.D. and Sage, G.H. (1991) Sociology of North American Sport (5th edn). Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
19.
Erickson, B.H. (1996) `Culture, Class and Connections', American Journal of Sociology102: 217-251.
20.
Holt, D.B. (1997) `Distinction in America? Recovering Bourdieu's Theory of Taste from its Critics', Poetics25: 93-120.
21.
Holt, D.B. (1998) `Does Cultural Capital Structure American Consumption?', Journal of Consumer Research25: 1-25.
22.
Hughes, M. and Peterson, R.A. (1983) `Isolating Cultural Choice Patterns in the US Population', American Behavioral Scientist26: 459-478.
23.
Lamont, M. (1992) Money, Morals, and Manners: The Culture of the French and American Upper-Middle Class. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Lamont, M. and Lareau, A. (1988) `Cultural Capital: Allusions, Gaps and Glissandos in Recent Theoretical Development', Sociological Theory6: 153-168.
25.
Lamont, M. , Schmalzbauer, J., Waller, M. and Weber, D. (1996) `Cultural and Moral Boundaries in the United States: Structural Position, Geographic Location, and Lifestyle Explanations', Poetics24: 31-56.
26.
Leonard, W.M., II (1998) A Sociological Perspective of Sports (5th edn). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
27.
Levine, L.W. (1988) Highbrow/Lowbrow: The Emergence of a Cultural Hierarchy in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
Mandell, R.D. (1984) Sport: A Cultural History. New York: Columbia University Press.
29.
Martin, T.W. and Berry, K.J. (1987) `Competitive Sport in Post-Industrial Society: The Case of the Motocross Racer', in Andrew Yiannakis, T.D. McIntire, M.J. Melnick and D.P. Hart (eds) Sport Sociology: Contemporary Themes (3rd edn), pp. 269-275. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
30.
Nixon, H.L., II , and Frey, J.H. (1996) A Sociology of Sport. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
31.
Peterson, R.A. (1997) `The Rise and Fall of Highbrow Snobbery as a Status Marker', Poetics25: 75-92.
32.
Peterson, R.A. and Kern, R.M. (1996) `Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore', American Sociological Review61: 900-907.
33.
Peterson, R.A and Simkus, A. (1992) `How Musical Tastes Mark Occupational Status Groups', in M. Lamont and M. Fournier (eds) Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality, pp. 152-186. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34.
Rojek, Chris (2000) `Leisure and the Rich Today: Veblen's Thesis after a Century', Leisure Studies 19: 1-15.
35.
Scholsberg, J. (1987) `Who Watches Television Sports?', American Demographics9: 45-49, 59.
36.
Schor, J.B. (1991) The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure. New York: Basic Books.
37.
White, P. and Wilson, B. (1999) `Distinctions in the Stands: An Investigation of Bourdieu's “Habitus”, Socioeconomic Status and Sport Spectatorship in Canada', International Review for the Sociology of Sport34: 245-264.
38.
Yergin, M.L. (1986) `Who Goes to the Game?', American Demographics8: 42-43.
39.
Young, M. and Willmott, P. (1973) The Symmetrical Family: A Study of Work and Leisure in the London Region. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
