This study examines the inequality of the use of skilled delivery assistance by the rural women of Bangladesh using the 2007 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey data. Simple cross-tabulation and univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were employed in the study. Overall, 56.1% of the women received at least one antenatal care visit, whereas only 13.2% births were assisted by skilled personnel. Findings revealed apparent inequality in using skilled delivery assistance by socioeconomic strata. Birth order, women’s education, religion, wealth index, region and antenatal care are important determinants of seeking skilled assistance. To ensure safe motherhood initiative, government should pay special attention to reduce inequality in seeking skilled delivery assistance. A strong focus on community-based and regional interventions is important in order to increase the utilization of safe maternal health care services in rural Bangladesh.
World Health Organization, United Nations Children’s Fund, United Nations Population Fund. Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990-2008. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010.
2.
HoganMCForemanKJNaghaviM. Maternal mortality for 181 countries, 1980-2008: a systematic analysis of progress towards MDG5. Lancet. 2010;375:1609-1623.
3.
HazembaANSiziyaS. Choice of place for childbirth: prevalence and correlates of utilization of health facilities in Chongwe district, Zambia. Med J Zambia. 2008;35:53-57.
4.
CampbellOGrahamW. Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. Lancet. 2006;368:1284-1299.
5.
MorrisonMTumbahangpheKMBudhathokiB. Community mobilisation and health management committee strengthening to increase birth attendance by trained health workers in rural Makwanpur, Nepal: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2011;12:128.
6.
United Nations Population Fund. Maternal Mortality Update 2004: Delivering Into Good Hands. New York, NY: United Nations Population Fund; 2004.
7.
World Health Organization, United Nations Children’s Fund, United Nations Population Fund. Maternal Mortality in 2000. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010.
8.
MahlerH. The safe motherhood initiative: a call to action. Lancet. 1987;1:668-670.
9.
WanjiraCMwangiMMathengeEMbuguaGNg’ang’aZ. Delivery practices and associated factors among mothers seeking child welfare services in selected health facilities in Nyandarua South District, Kenya. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:360.
10.
National Institute of Population Research and Training, Mitra and Associates, and ICF International. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2011. Dhaka, Bangladesh/Calverton, MD: National Institute of Population Research and Training, Mitra and Associates, and ICF International; 2012.
11.
National Institute of Population Research and Training, Mitra and Associates, and Macro International. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2007. Dhaka, Bangladesh/Calverton, MD: National Institute of Population Research and Training, Mitra and Associates, and Macro International; 2009.
12.
AndersenRM. National health surveys and the behavioral model of health services use. Med Care. 2008;46:647-653.
13.
BegumHASayemAMNiliNY. Differentials in place of delivery and delivery assistance in urban slum areas, Bangladesh. J Fam Reprod Health. 2012; 6:49-58.
14.
KamalSMM. Factors affecting utilization of skilled maternity care services among married adolescents in Bangladesh. Asian Popul Stud. 2009;5:153-170.
15.
BabalolaSFatusiA. Determinants of use of maternal health services in Nigeria—looking beyond individual and household factors. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9:43.
16.
SiziyaSMuulaASRudatsikiraE. Socio-economic factors associated with delivery assisted by traditional birth attendants in Iraq, 2000. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2009;9:7.
17.
CelikYHotchkissDR: The socioeconomic determinants of maternal health care utilization in Turkey. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50:1797-1806.
18.
NavaneethamKDharmalingamA. Utilisation of maternal health care services in southern India. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:1849-1869.
19.
ThindAMohaniABanerjeeKHagigiF. Where to deliver? Analysis of choice of delivery location from a national survey in India. BMC Public Health. 2008; 8:29.
20.
JatTRNagNSanSebastian. Factors affecting the use of maternal health services in Madhya Pradesh state of India: a multilevel analysis. Int J Equity Health. 2011;10:59.
21.
MalqvistMSohelNDoTTErikssonLPerssonL. Distance decay in delivery care utilization associated with neonatal mortality: a case referent study in northern Vietnam. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:762.
22.
NoorAMZurovacDHaySIOcholaSASnowRW. Defining equity in physical access to clinical services using geographical information systems as part of malaria planning and monitoring in Kenya. Trop Med Int Health. 2003;8:917-926.
23.
GageAJ. Barriers to the utilization of maternal health care in rural Mali. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65:1666-1682.
24.
ShahNRohraDKShamsHKhanNH. Home deliveries: reasons and adverse outcomes in women presenting to a tertiary care hospital. J Pak Med Assoc. 2010;60:555-558.
25.
GoodburnEAChowdhuryMGaziRMarshalTGrahamW. Training traditional birth attendants in clean delivery does not prevent postpartum infection. Health Policy Plan. 2000;15:394-399.
26.
SenarathUGunawardena. Women’s autonomy in decision making for health care in South Asia. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2009;21:137-143.
27.
MainBLowerTJamesRRouseI. Changes in ante-natal care and family planning in Krakor, Pursat, Cambodia, 1996-1998. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2001;13:74-78.
