Enhancing Risk Communication for More Effective Epidemic Control in Taiwan

Abstract

This article investigates how to more effectively conduct risk communication to increase the probability of successful control of an epidemic in Taiwan. The epidemic control of H1N1 in Taiwan in 2010 was studied. We used factor analysis and Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) to obtain the total influence for each factor and to determine the critical factors among them. After being processed using proposed operational procedures, we obtained the critical factors and found that the government plays the key role in successful epidemic control. To reduce the resistance to efforts that seek to prevent pandemic crises, some necessary intervention activities, such as fairly and honorably exploring the complete relevant information and revealing the side effects of vaccines in a manner that is easily understood, were recommended. These could lead to an increase in immunizations among Taiwanese people by gaining their trust and commitment, thus achieving control of this epidemic.

Keywords

risk communication epidemic control H1N1 factor analysis DEMATEL

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adisasmito

Hunter

Krumkamp

. Pandemic influenza and health system resource gaps in Bali: an analysis through a resource transmission dynamics model [published online November 14, 2011]. Asia Pac J Public Health. doi:10.1177/1010539511421365.

Anderson

Iltis

. Assessing and improving research participants’ understanding of risk: potential lessons from the literature on physician-patient risk communication. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2007;3:27-37.

Cohn

Vazquez

Alvarez

. Quantifying risk: verbal probability expressions in Spanish and English. Am J Health Behav. 2009;33:244-254.

Davis

Schhorman

Mayer

Tan

. Trusted unit manager and business unit performance: empirical evidence of a competitive advantage. Strateg Manage J. 2000;21:563-576.

Chandran

Menon

. When a day means more than a year: effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk. Journal of Consumer Research. 2004; 31:375-389.

Klimoski

Karol

. The impact of trust on creative problem solving groups. J Psychol. 1976;61:630-633.

Lai

. Organizational collaborative capacities in fighting pandemic crises: a literature review from the public management perspective. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2012;24:1-14.

Larson

LaFasto

FMJ

. Teamwork: what must go right, what can go wrong. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1989.

Lundgren

McMakin

. Risk Communication. Columbus, OH: Battelle; 2004.

10.

Podsakoff

Organ

. Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manage. 1986;12:531-544.

11.

Thomson

Edwards

Grey

. Risk communication in the clinical consultation. Clin Med. 2005;5:465-469.

12.

Wynne

. Technology, risk and participation: on the social treatment of uncertainty. In: Conrad

, ed. Society, Technology and Risk Assessment. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1980:173-208.

13.

Zhang

Yang

Liyanage

. The characteristics of imported cases and the effectiveness of outbreak control strategies of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) in China [published online May 5, 2011]. Asia Pac J Public Health. doi:10.1177/1010539511408285.