The effect of individual educational attainment on health has been extensively documented in western countries, whereas empirical evidence of education spillover effects in marital dyads is scarce and inconsistent. A total of 2764 individuals (or 1382 marital dyads) were surveyed in the Shanghai Healthy City Project 2008. Logistic regression models were used for analysis, and all analyses were stratified by gender. Significant protective associations were observed in univariate models linking general health status to the individual’s own educational attainment and to their partner’s educational level. After controlling for presence of chronic conditions, lifestyle factors, and social support, these associations were attenuated. The authors found a gender difference in the association of spouse’s educational attainment with self-rated health. The influence of education on health may be partly mediated by lifestyle and other factors.
BravemanPACubbinCEgerterS. Socioeconomic status in health research: one size does not fit all. JAMA. 2005;294:2879-2888.
2.
YenIHMossN. Unbundling education: a critical discussion of what education confers and how it lowers risk for disease and death. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;896:350-351.
3.
FuhrerRShipleyMJChastangJF. Socioeconomic position, health, and possible explanations: a tale of two cohorts. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:1290-1294.
4.
LiuXHermalinAIChuangYL. The effect of education on mortality among older Taiwanese and its pathways. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1998;53:S71-S82.
5.
McFaddenELubenRKhawKT. Different measures of social class in women and mortality. Eur J Epidemiol. 2009;24:231-236.
6.
BruhnJGChandlerBLynnTNWolfS. Social characteristics of patients with coronary heart disease. Am J Med Sci. 1966;251:629-637.
7.
SuarezLBarrett-ConnorE. Is an educated wife hazardous to your health?Am J Epidemiol. 1984;119:244-249.
8.
WilsonSE. The health capital of families: an investigation of the inter-spousal correlation in health status. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:1157-1172.
9.
MondenCWvan LentheFde GraafNDKraaykampG. Partner’s and own education: does who you live with matter for self-assessed health, smoking and excessive alcohol consumption?Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:1901-1912.
10.
SkalickaVKunstAE. Effects of spouses’ socioeconomic characteristics on mortality among men and women in a Norwegian longitudinal study. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:2035-2047.
11.
JaffeDHEisenbachZNeumarkYDManorO. Effects of husbands’ and wives’ education on each other’s mortality. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:2014-2023.
12.
BosmaHAppelsASturmansFGrabauskasVGostautasA. Educational level of spouses and risk of mortality: the WHO Kaunas-Rotterdam Intervention Study (KRIS). Int J Epidemiol. 1995;24:119-126.
13.
EgelandGMTverdalAMeyerHESelmerR. A man’s heart and a wife’s education: a 12-year coronary heart disease mortality follow-up in Norwegian men. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:799-805.
14.
TorssanderJEriksonR. Marital partner and mortality: the effects of the social positions of both spouses. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009;63:992-998.
15.
HurtLSRonsmansCSahaS. Effects of education and other socioeconomic factors on middle age mortality in rural Bangladesh. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58:315-320.
16.
LiuXLiangJGuS. Flows of social support and health status among older persons in China. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1175-1184.
17.
Haseli-MashhadiNPanAYeX. Self-rated health in middle-aged and elderly Chinese: distribution, determinants and associations with cardio-metabolic risk factors. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:368.
18.
BaumanABullFCheyT. The International Prevalence Study on Physical Activity: results from 20 countries. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:21.
19.
ChenCLuFC. The guidelines for prevention and control of overweight and obesity in Chinese adults. Biomed Environ Sci. 2004;17(suppl):1-36.
20.
ChengSTChanAC. Social support and self-rated health revisited: is there a gender difference in later life?Soc Sci Med. 2006;63:118-122.
21.
SubramanianSVSubramanyamMASelvarajSKawachiI. Are self-reports of health and morbidities in developing countries misleading? Evidence from India. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68:260-265.
22.
LeeJWJonesPSMineyamaYZhangXE. Cultural differences in responses to a Likert scale. Res Nurs Health. 2002;25:295-306.
23.
NgTPLimLCJinAShinfukuN. Ethnic differences in quality of life in adolescents among Chinese, Malay and Indians in Singapore. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:1755-1768.
24.
MelchiorMBerkmanLFNiedhammerICheaMGoldbergM. Social relations and self-reported health: a prospective analysis of the French Gazel cohort. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:1817-1830.
25.
ChooWYLowWYKarinaRPoiPJEbenezerEPrinceMJ. Social support and burden among caregivers of patients with dementia in Malaysia. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2003;15:23-29.
26.
DowdJBZajacovaA. Does the predictive power of self-rated health for subsequent mortality risk vary by socioeconomic status in the US?Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:1214-1221.
27.
WillemsenGVinkJMBoomsmaDI. Assortative mating may explain spouses’ risk of same disease. BMJ. 2003;326:396.
28.
HomishGGLeonardKE. Spousal influence on smoking behaviors in a US community sample of newly married couples. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:2557-2567.
29.
Quesnel-ValleeA. Self-rated health: caught in the crossfire of the quest for “true” health?Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:1161-1164.
30.
AhnBCEngelhardtKJoungH. Income-related health inequalities in Korea. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2010;22:32-41.
