A large number of small-holder dairy farmers (SDFs), with low yields and low input costs, have led to an inflated, inefficient livestock in India, with a much greater carbon footprint than necessary. The adoption of cross-breeding by SDFs should lead to increased yields. However, cross-breeding is not popular in India as in many other less-developed economies where SDFs dominate milk production. This article investigates whether market incentives are enough to induce the more efficient technique of cross-breeding among SDFs in a fairly competitive environment. We conduct a detailed primary survey on 300 SDFs from Haryana state in India to understand the choices determining breed composition in the herd. Using a system instrumental variable approach to deal with endogeneity and simultaneity, we estimate the impact of a measure of market exposure (based on milk sales) on the household’s herd composition. Our results indicate that market exposure does not automatically lead to adoption of cross-breeding. Farmers generally rear buffaloes and cross-bred cattle similarly in terms of feed and medical care, leading to a loss of potential yield of the cross-bred animals.
Al KalaldehM., SwaminathanM., GaundareY., JoshiS., AlilooH., StruckenE. M., DucrocqV., & GibsonJ. P. (2021). “Genomic evaluation of milk yield in a smallholder cross-bred dairy production system in India.”Genetics Selection Evolution, 53, 1–14.
2.
AldermanH., MergosG., & SladeR. (1987). “Cooperatives and the commercialization of milk production in India”[Working Papers on Commercialization of Agriculture and Nutrition]. International Food Policy Research Institute.
3.
AnagolS., EtangA., & KarlanD. (2017). “Continued existence of cows disproves central tenets of capitalism?”Economic Development and Cultural Change, 65, 583–618.
4.
AttanasioO., & AugsburgB. (2018). “Holy cows or cash cows? The economic return to livestock in rural India.”Economic Development and Cultural Change, 66, 307–330.
5.
BanerjeeA. (1994). Dairying systems in India. Indian Dairyman, 46, 593–601.
6.
BasuP. (2009). “Success and failure of cross-bred cows in India: A place-based approach to rural development.”Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99, 746–766.
7.
BasunatheV., SawarkarS., & SasidharP. (2010). “Adoption of dairy production technologies and implications for dairy development in India.”Outlook on Agriculture, 39, 134–140.
8.
BayanB., & DuttaM. (2017). “Cross-bred cattle adoption and its impact on income and household milk consumption among dairy farmers: Empirical evidence from Assam.”Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72, 154–165.
9.
BesleyT., & CaseA. (1993). “Modeling technology adoption in developing countries.”The American Economic Review, 83, 396–402.
10.
BifulcoR., FletcherJ. M., & RossS. L. (2011). “The effect of classmate characteristics on post-secondary outcomes: Evidence from the add health.”American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3, 25–53.
11.
ConleyT. G., & UdryC. R. (2010). “Learning about a new technology: Pineapple in Ghana.”American Economic Review, 100, 35–69.
12.
DehinenetG., MekonnenH., KidoidoM., AshenafiM., & BleichE. G. (2014). “Factors influencing adoption of dairy technology on small holder dairy farmers in selected zones of Amhara and Oromia National Regional States, Ethiopia.”Discourse Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 2, 126–135.
13.
FederG., JustR. E., & ZilbermanD. (1985). “Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey.”Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33, 255–298.
14.
GuptaR., & DasguptaA. (2020). “Milk will drive methane emissions in India.”Climatic Change, 161, 653–664.
15.
HarrisM., BoseN. K., KlassM., MencherJ. P., ObergK., OplerM. K., SuttlesW., & VaydaA. P. (1966). “The cultural ecology of India’s sacred cattle [and comments and replies].”Current Anthropology, 7, 51–66.
16.
HeffernanC., ThomsonK., & NielsenL. (2011). “Caste, livelihoods and livestock: An exploration of the uptake of livestock vaccination adoption among poor farmers in India.”Journal of International Development, 23, 103–118.
17.
HemmeT., GarciaO., & SahaA. (2003). A review of milk production in India with particular emphasis on small-scale producers[PPLPI Working Papers 23777]. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Pro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative.
18.
HemmeT., & OtteJ. (2010). “Status and prospects for smallholder milk production: A global perspective.”FAO.
19.
HerreroM., GraceD., NjukiJ., JohnsonN., EnahoroD., SilvestriS., & RufinoM. C. (2013). “The roles of livestock in developing countries.”Animal, 7, 3–18.
20.
KaziangaH., & UdryC. (2006). “Consumption smoothing? Livestock, insurance and drought in rural Burkina Faso.”Journal of Development Economics, 79, 413–446.
21.
KhodeN., SawarkarS., BanthiaV., NandeM., & BasunatheV. (2016). “Adoption of improved dairy cattle management practices under Vidarbha development programme package.”Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 9, 80–84.
KumarA., BirthalP., & JoshiP. (2003). “Research on cross-breeding in cattle: An analysis of its economic and social impact in India.”Agricultural Economics Research Review, 16, 91–102.
24.
LavyV., & SchlosserA. (2011). “Mechanisms and impacts of gender peer effects at school.”American Economic Journal, Applied Economics, 3, 1–33.
25.
LeroyG., BaumungR., BoettcherP., ScherfB., & HoffmannI. (2016). “Sustainability of cross-breeding in developing countries; definitely not like crossing a meadow...”Animal, 10, 262–273.
26.
MalikB., MeenaB., & RaoS. (2005). “Study of existing dairy farming practices in Uttar Pradesh.”Journal of Dairying, Foods and Home Sciences, 24, 91–95.
27.
ManiR., & BeillardM. (2021). “India and dairy products annual 2021 [Report Number: IN2021-0122] GAIN Report, Washington, USDA Foreign Agricultural Service”.
28.
MekonnenH., DehninetG., & KelayB. (2010). “Dairy technology adoption in smallholder farms in “Dejen” district, Ethiopia.”Tropical Animal Health and Production, 42, 209–216.
29.
NairK. N. (1982). Technological change in milk production: A review of some critical issues with reference to South Africa [South Asia]. Economic and Political Weekly, 17, A15–A20.
30.
QuddusA. (2012). “Adoption of dairy farming technologies by small farm holders: Practices and constraints.”Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science, 41, 124–135.
31.
QuddusA. (2017). “Performance and perceptions of adoption of cross-bred cattle by smallholder in Bangladesh.”International Journal of Agricultural Policy and Research, 5, 63–69.
32.
RajapurohitA. R. (1979). Cross-breeding of Indian cattle: An evaluation. Economic and Political Weekly, 14, A9–A24.
33.
RajendranK., & MohantyS. (2004). “Dairy co-operatives and milk marketing in India: Constraints and opportunities.”Journal of Food Distribution Research, 35, 34–41.
34.
RaoS. V. N., VenkatasubramanianV., & WitJ. D. (1995). Consequences of crossbreeding programme in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 30, A112–A116.
35.
RoschinskyR., KluszczynskaM., SölknerJ., PuskurR., & WurzingerM. (2015). “Smallholder experiences with dairy cattle cross-breeding in the tropics: From introduction to impact.”Animal, 9, 150–157.
36.
RosenzweigM. R., & WolpinK. I. (1993). “Credit market constraints, consumption smoothing, and the accumulation of durable production assets in low-income countries: Investments in bullocks in India.”Journal of Political Economy, 101, 223–244.
37.
RuttanV. W. (1977). The green revolution: Seven generalizations. International Development Review, 19, 16–22.
38.
SarkarA. (2020). “Role of livestock farming in meeting livelihood challenges of SC cultivators in India.”Indian Journal of Human Development, 14, 23–41.
39.
ShineK. P., & SturgesW. T. (2007). “CO2 is not the only gas.”Science, 315, 1804–1805.
40.
SwamyM., & BhattacharyaS. (2006). Budgeting anthropogenic greenhouse gas emission from Indian livestock using country-specific emission coefficients. Current Science, 91, 1340–1353.
41.
YadavS. (2024). “Animal husbandry and social reproduction: A case study from Haryana.”Review of Agrarian Studies, 14, 56–81.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
