Abstract
Whether the adoption of an inflation targeting (IT) regime reduces exchange rate volatility has been a heated debate and a subject of intense research. On the one hand, exchange rate volatility can be addressed by managing the inflation rate. On the other hand, exchange rate volatility cannot be manipulated by interest rates as the main instrument in the inflation targeting regime. This article aims at examining the impact of inflation targeting regime on exchange rate volatility. Taking the case of Indonesia over the period 2000(1)–2022(12), we found that the targeted inflation lowers inflation rate instability. However, our two-stage generalised autoregressive heteroskedasticity conditional model estimation concludes that inflation volatility induces exchange rate volatility. Accordingly, announcing higher inflation targets may not be costly to reduce inflation uncertainty, resulting in a decline in exchange rate volatility. Furthermore, market intervention can symmetrically mitigate exchange rate volatility. Accordingly, market intervention is needed as an additional instrument for macroeconomic stabilisation. In other words, the optimal stock of foreign reserves (FR) management might avoid Indonesia’s monetary authority to impose dual goals of inflation and exchange rate stability.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
