Aberrant rise in c-section deliveries and associated cost have raised concern to achieve the development goals. Given this, India has launched various schemes to directly serve the mother and newborn and to protect the households from financial hardship for childbirth. Using nationally representative unit level data, the article aims to explore the extent of c-section delivery in India and to capture the financial burden on the households due to c-section deliveries. It is observed that the c-section delivery has increased substantially in almost all Indian states. Both rural and urban sector of the states have reported alarmingly high c-section rates. Urban-India reports around 35% c-section cases and the figure for rural region is 19%. However, out-of-pocket expenditure has decreased marginally in the public facilities for c-section. Surprisingly, in many states poorest class pays much higher than the other expenditure classes even in the public facilities for c-section. Additionally, in the public sector, a considerable proportion of the households are spending substantially high share of their annual consumption expenditure to purchase medicine and diagnostic tests in the public facilities. Therefore, information asymmetry about the government schemes and related informal expenses needs to be addressed for better outcome.
AshA. & OkahD. (1997). What is the right number of caesarean sections?The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)62143-5
2.
BajpaiV. (2014). The challenges confronting public hospitals in India, their origins, and possible solutions. Advanced in Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/898502.
3.
BehagueD. P., CesarG. V., & FernandoC. B. (2002). Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil: Informed decision making, patient choice, cohort study linking ethnographic and or social inequality? A population based birth epidemiological methods. British Medical Journal, 324(20).
4.
BoermaT., RonsmansC., MelesseD. Y., BarrosA. J. D., BarrosF. C., JuanL., MollerA. B., SayL., HosseinpoorA. R., YiM., de Lyra Rabello NetoD., & TemmermanM. (2018). Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. The Lancet, 392(10155), 1341–1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7
5.
BoseM., & DuttaA. (2015). Inequity in hospitalization care: A study on utilization of healthcare services in West Bengal, India. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 4(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2015.05.
6.
BoseM., & DuttaA. (2018). Health financing strategies to reduce out-of-pocket burden in India: A comparative study of three states. BMC Health Services Research, 18(830). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3633-5.
7.
CavallaroF. L., CresswellJ. A., FrançaG. V., VictoraC. G., BarrosA. J., & RonsmansC. (2013). Trends in caesarean delivery by country and wealth quintile: Cross-sectional surveys in southern Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 91(12), 914–922. https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.13.117598.
8.
DanigondA. (2021). 5 reasons why India’s healthcare system is struggling. BusinessLine. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/national/5-reasons-why-indias-healthcare-system-is-struggling/article34665535.ece
9.
DeatonA. (2003). Household surveys, consumption, and the measurement of poverty. Economic Systems Research, 15(2), 135–159.
10.
DoddJ. M., CrowtherC. A., HuertasE., GuiseJ-M., & HoreyD. (2013). Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004224.pub3
11.
DuttaA., & BandyopadhyayS. (2019). Policy intervention for access to medicine: Does it work similarly for poor and non-poor?International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2671.
12.
FawcusS., & MoodleyJ. (2013). Postpartum haemorhage associated with caesarean section and caesarean hysterectomy. Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 27(2), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.08.018.
13.
FengX. L., XuL., GuoY., & RonsmansC. (2012). Factors influencing rising caesarean section rates in China between 1988 and 2008. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 90(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.11.090399.
14.
GeraR., NarwalR., JainM., TanejaG., & GuptaS. (2018). Sustainable development goals: Leveraging the global agenda for driving health policy reforms and achieving universal health coverage in India. Indian Journal of Community Medicine. https://doi.org/10.4103%2Fijcm.IJCM_41_18
15.
GhoshS., & JamesK. S. (2010). Levels and trends in caesarean births: Cause for concern? Economic & Political Weekly, 45(5), 19–22.
16.
Government of NCT Delhi. (2021). Delhi Arogya Kosh. Health & Family Welfare. http://health.delhigovt.nic.in/wps/wcm/connect/doit_health/Health/Home/Directorate+General+of+Health+Services/Delhi+Arogya+Kosh.
17.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) (2007). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–06: India.
18.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) (2017). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015–16: India.
19.
KeelerE. B., & BrodieM. (1993). Economic incentives in the choice between vaginal delivery and caesarean section. The Milbank Quarterly, 71(3).
20.
LewisM. (2010). Informal payments and the financing of health care in developing and transition countries[Working Paper No 98]. International Policy Centre. http://gbsn.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/financing-healt-care-developing-transition.pdf.
21.
MehtaA., ApersL., VerstraelenH., & TemmermanM. (2001). Trends in caesarean section rates at a maternity hospital in Mumbai, India. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 19(4), 306–312.
22.
MishraU. S., & RamanathanM. (2002). Delivery-related complications & determinants caesarean section rates in India. Health Policy & Planning, 17(1), 90–98.
23.
ModuguH. R., KumarM., KumarA., & MillettC. (2012). State and socio-demographic group variation in out-of-pocket expenditure, borrowings and Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) programme use for birth deliveries in India. BMC Public Health, 12(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-1048.
24.
MohantyS. K., & SrivastavaA. (2013). Out-of-pocket expenditure on institutional delivery in India. Health Policy and Planning, 28(3), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czs057
25.
MohantyS. K., PandaB. K., KhanP. K., & BeheraP. (2019). Out-of-pocket expenditure and correlates of caesarean births in public and private health centres in India. Social Science and Medicine, 224, 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.048.
26.
National Health Portal, GoI. (2021a). Janani Shishu Suraksha Karyakaram. https://www.nhp.gov.in/janani-shishu-suraksha-karyakaram-jssk_pg.
27.
National Health Portal. GoI. (2021b). Janani Suraksha Yojanahttps://www.nhp.gov.in/janani-suraksha-yojana-jsy-_pg.
28.
National Institute of Health. (2006). Caesarean delivery on maternal request (State of the Science Conference Statement).
29.
PadmadasS. S., KumarS., NairS. B., & KumariA. (2000). Caesarean section delivery in Kerala, India: Evidence from a National Family Health Survey. Social Science and Medicine, 51(4), 511–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00491-8.
30.
PetersonC. M. (1990). Socio-economic differences in rates of caesarean section. The New England Journal of Medicine, 322(4), 268–269.
31.
PotterJ. E., BerquoE., PerpetuoI., OndinaL. F., HopkinsK., MartaR. S., & MariaC. (2001). Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: Prospective study. British Medical Journal, 323(17).
32.
PrinjaS., BahugunaP., TripathyJ. P., & KumarR. (2015). Availability of medicines in public sector health facilities of two North Indian states. BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology, 16(43). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-015-0043-8.
33.
RadhakrishnanT., VasanthakumariK. P., & BabuP. K. (2017). Increasing trend of caesarean rates in India: Evidence from NFHS-4. Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research, 5(8), 26167–26176. https://doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i8.31.
34.
SchiffM., & RogersC. (1999). Factors predicting cesarean delivery for American Indian women in New Mexico. Birth, 26(4), 226–231. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-536x.1999.00226.x.
35.
SekhavatL., TabatabaiiA., DaliliM., FarajkhodaT., & TaftiA. D. (2009). Efficacy of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss after cesarean section. Journal of Maternal–Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 22(1), 72–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767050802353580.
36.
ShahP. (2016). MDGs to SDGs: Reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health in India. Observer Research Foundation. https://www.orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/ORF_Occasional_Paper_103_RMNCH-.pdf
37.
SinghP. K., RaiR. K., SinghS., & SinghL. (2018). Rising caesarean births: A growing concern. Economic & Political Weekly, 53(26–27), 22–24.
38.
SreevidyaS., & SathiyasekaranB. W. C. (2003). High caesarean rates in Madras (India): A population-based crosssectional study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 110(2), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02006.x.
39.
Statista. (2022). Estimated number of public and private hospitals across India as of 2019, by state. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1128739/india-number-of-public-and-private-hospitals-by-state-estimated/.
40.
TripathiN., JohnD., ChatterjeeP. K., MurthyS., ParganihaN., & Arti BrokarA. (2020). Informal payments for maternal and neonatal health services in public hospitals in Central India. Journal of Health Management, 22(2), 490–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972063420908158.
41.
World Health Organization (WHO). (1985). Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet, 2, 436–437.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
