This article utilises the vector error correction model (VECM) and Granger causality tests to explore short-run and long-run relationships, in India, across carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, energy consumption, agriculture value added (AV), trade liberalisation and financial development over the time period 1971–2013. The study adopts the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL)-bound testing approach and Johansen–Juselius maximum likelihood procedure to find out the cointegrating relation among the variables. Both ARDL approach and Johansen–Juselius cointegration approach show that the concerned variables under study are cointegrated. Short-run Granger causality results indicate the existence of bidirectional causality between AV and CO2 emissions, and energy used and CO2 emissions. In the long-run trade, financial development, energy consumption and AV affect CO2 emissions. The results put thrust on the need to utilise energy-efficient technologies in agriculture to save the damage of the environment.
AkarcaA. T.LongT. V. (1980). On the relationship between energy and GNP: A reexamination. The Journal of Energy and Development, 5(2), 326–331.
2.
AlamM. J.BegumI. A.BuysseJ.RahmanS.Van HuylenbroeckG. (2011). Dynamic modeling of causal relationship between energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(6), 3243–3251.
3.
Al-MulaliU.LeeJ. Y.MohammedA. H.Sheau-TingL. (2013). Examining the link between energy consumption, carbon dioxide emission, and economic growth in Latin America and the Caribbean. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 26(October), 42–48.
4.
Al-MulaliU.Weng-WaiC.Sheau-TingL.MohammedA. H. (2015). Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecological Indicators, 48(January), 315–323.
5.
AltinayG.KaragolE. (2005). Electricity consumption and economic growth: Evidence from Turkey. Energy Economics, 27(6), 849–856.
6.
AnderssonR.QuigleyJ. M.WilhelmssonM. (2009). Urbanization, productivity, and innovation: Evidence from investment in higher education. Journal of Urban Economics, 66(1), 2–15.
7.
Asafu-AdjayeJ. (2000). The relationship between energy consumption, energy prices and economic growth: Time series evidence from Asian developing countries. Energy Economics, 22(6), 615–625.
8.
BoutabbaM. A. (2014). The impact of financial development, income, energy and trade on carbon emissions: Evidence from the Indian economy. Economic Modelling, 40(June), 33–41.
9.
ChangY.WongJ. F. (2001). Poverty, energy and economic growth in Singapore (Working Paper No.). Singapore: Department of Economics, National University of Singapore.
10.
ChengB. S. (1995). An investigation of cointegration and causality between energy consumption and economic growth. Journal of Energy and Development, 21(1), 73–84.
11.
ChengB. S. (1998). Energy consumption, employment and causality in Japan: A multivariate approach. Indian Economic Review, 2(4), 19–29.
12.
ChengB. S.LaiT. W. (1997). An investigation of co-integration and causality between energy consumption and economic activity in Taiwan. Energy Economics, 19(4), 435–444.
13.
DickeyD. A.FullerW. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427–431.
14.
DindaS.CoondooD. (2006). Income and emission: A panel data-based cointegration analysis. Ecological Economics, 57(2), 167–181.
15.
EngleR. F.GrangerC. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error-correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276.
16.
Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Global greenhouse gas emissions data. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data
17.
ErolU.YuE. S. (1987). On the causal relationship between energy and income for industrialized countries. Journal of Energy and Development, 13(1), 113–122.
18.
European Environment Agency. (n.d.). Emission database for global atmospheric research (EDGAR). Retrieved from https://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/air/links/data-sources/emission-database-for-global-atmospheric
19.
FarhaniS.OzturkI. (2015). Causal relationship between CO2 emissions, real GDP, energy consumption, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization in Tunisia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(20), 15663–15676.
20.
FilipovicD.KosuticS.GospodaricZ.ZimmerR.BanajD. (2006). The possibilities of fuel savings and the reduction of CO2 emissions in the soil tillage in Croatia. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 115(1), 290–294.
21.
GandhiV.NamboodiriN. V. (Eds.). (2009). Water resource development and institutions in India: Overview and profile. In Reforming institutions in water resource management: Policy and performance for sustainable development (p. 146). Routledge: Earthscan.
22.
GhoshS. (2010). Examining carbon emissions economic growth nexus for India: A multivariate cointegration approach. Energy Policy, 38(6), 3008–3014.
23.
GrossmanG. M.KruegerA. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement (NBER Working Paper No. w3914). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
24.
GujaratiD. N. (2009). Basic econometrics. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
25.
HaliciogluF. (2009). An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy, 37(3), 1156–1164.
26.
HeJ.RichardP. (2010). Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 in Canada. Ecological Economics, 69(5), 1083–1093.
27.
HeilM. T.SeldenT. M. (2001). International trade intensity and carbon emissions: A cross-country econometric analysis. The Journal of Environment & Development, 10(1), 35–49.
28.
JayanthakumaranK.VermaR.LiuY. (2012). CO2 emissions, energy consumption, trade and income: A comparative analysis of China and India. Energy Policy, 42(March), 450–460.
29.
JebliM. B.YoussefS. B. (2016). Renewable energy consumption and agriculture: Evidence for cointegration and Granger causality for Tunisian economy. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2016.1196467
30.
JhaG. K.PalS.SinghA. (2012). Changing energy-use pattern and the demand projection for Indian agriculture. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 25(1), 61–68.
31.
JohansenS.JuseliusK. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration—With applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169–210.
32.
KanjilalK.GhoshS. (2013). Environmental Kuznet’s curve for India: Evidence from tests for cointegration with unknown structural breaks. Energy Policy, 56(May), 509–515.
33.
KraftJ.KraftA. (1978). On the relationship between energy and GNP. Journal of Energy Development, 3(2), 401–403.
34.
LauL. S.ChoongC. K.EngY. K. (2014). Investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Malaysia: Do foreign direct investment and trade matter? Energy Policy, 68(May), 490–497.
35.
LeanH. H.SmythR. (2010). CO2 emissions, electricity consumption and output in ASEAN. Applied Energy, 87(6), 1858–1864.
36.
MasihA. M.MasihR. (1996). Energy consumption, real income and temporal causality: Results from a multi-country study based on cointegration and error-correction modelling techniques. Energy Economics, 18(3), 165–183.
37.
MasihA. M.MasihR. (1997). On the temporal causal relationship between energy consumption, real income, and prices: Some new evidence from Asian-energy dependent NICs based on a multivariate cointegration/vector error-correction approach. Journal of Policy Modeling, 19(4), 417–440.
38.
MorimotoR.HopeC. (2004). The impact of electricity supply on economic growth in Sri Lanka. Energy Economics, 26(1), 77–85.
39.
NarayanP. K.SinghB. (2007). The electricity consumption and GDP nexus for the Fiji Islands. Energy Economics, 29(6), 1141–1150.
40.
NarayanP. K.SmythR. (2008). Energy consumption and real GDP in G7 countries: New evidence from panel cointegration with structural breaks. Energy Economics, 30(5), 2331–2341.
41.
OEPP. (2000). Thailand’s initial National Communication under the UNFCCC (Exclusive Summary). Thailand: Office of Environmental Policy and Planning, Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment.
42.
OhW.LeeK. (2004). Energy consumption and economic growth in Korea: Testing the causality relation. Journal of Policy Modeling, 26(8), 973–981.
43.
OsabuohienE. S.EfobiU. R.GitauC. M. W. (2014). Beyond the environmental Kuznets curve in Africa: Evidence from panel cointegration. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 16(4), 517–538.
44.
OzturkI.UddinG. S. (2012). Causality among carbon emissions, energy consumption and growth in India. Ekonomska Istraživanja, 25(3), 752–775.
45.
PaoH. T.TsaiC. M. (2011). Multivariate Granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): Evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) countries. Energy, 36(1), 685–693.
46.
PayneJ. E. (2009). On the dynamics of energy consumption and output in the US. Applied Energy, 86(4), 575–577.
47.
PesaranM. H.ShinY. (1999). An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approachData Tables. Planning Commission, Government of India. Retrieved from http://planningcommission.nic.in/data/datatable/index.php?data=datatab
48.
PesaranM. H.ShinY.SmithR. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.
49.
Planning Commission. (2011). Mid-term appraisal: Eleventh five year plan 2007 – 2012. OUP Catalogue. New Delhi: Author.
50.
RobertsonG. P.PaulE. A.HarwoodR. R. (2000). Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: Contributions of individual gases to the radiative forcing of the atmosphere. Science, 289(5486), 1922–1925.
51.
ShafikN. (1994). Economic development and environmental quality: An econometric analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, 46(October), 757–773.
52.
SinghS.MittalJ. P. (1992). Energy in production agriculture. Delhi: Mittal Publications.
53.
SkazaJ. S.BlaisB. S. (2013). The relationship between economic growth and environmental degradation: Exploring models and questioning the existence of an environmental Kuznets curve (Working Paper No. 2013–05). Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2346173; http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2346173
54.
SoytasU.SariR. (2003). Energy consumption and GDP: Causality relationship in G-7 countries and emerging markets. Energy Economics, 25(1), 33–37.
55.
SqualliJ. (2007). Electricity consumption and economic growth: Bounds and causality analyses of OPEC members. Energy Economics, 29(6), 1192–1205.
56.
SrinivasanP.RavindraI. S. (2015). Causality among energy consumption, CO2 emission, economic growth and trade: A case of India. Foreign Trade Review, 50(3), 168–189.
57.
SternD. I. (2000). A multivariate cointegration analysis of the role of energy in the US macroeconomy. Energy Economics, 22(2), 267–283.
58.
TamazianA.RaoB. B. (2010). Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies. Energy Economics, 32(1), 137–145.
59.
TiwariA. K.ShahbazM.HyeQ. M. A. (2013). The environmental Kuznets curve and the role of coal consumption in India: Cointegration and causality analysis in an open economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 18(February), 519–527.
60.
(n.d.). Trends in global CO2emissions report. Retrieved from http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/news_docs/jrc-2015- trends-in-global-CO2-emissions-2015-report-98184.pdf
61.
World Bank. (n.d.). World development indicators. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org
62.
YangH. Y. (2000). A note on the causal relationship between energy and GDP in Taiwan. Energy Economics, 22(3), 309–317.
63.
YavuzN. Ç. (2014). CO2 emission, energy consumption, and economic growth for Turkey: Evidence from a cointegration test with a structural break. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 9(3), 229–235.
64.
YuE. S. H.ChoiJ. Y. (1985). The causal relationship between energy and GNP: An international comparison. The Journal of Energy and Development, 10(2), 249–272.
65.
YuE. S. H.HwangB. K. (1984). The relationship between energy and economic growth in Korea. Applied Energy, 83, 1181–1189.
