Outsourcing as a form of production reorganisation has important implications for factor productivity. Empirical verification of this relationship for India, however, is unavailable in the recent times. To fill this gap, we measure the relationship between outsourcing and multifactor productivity for Indian firms between 2010 and 2014. We use fixed-effect panel data regression and GMM estimates to establish that outsourcing raises productivity significantly at the source. The outsourcing–productivity link has important policy implications for developing countries, such as India. Relative inflexibility of labour market institutions and slow-moving legal procedures may otherwise restrict the restructuring of firms under duress. Outsourcing-related productivity improvements might have helped to overcome such disadvantages even during the global crisis of 2008–2009.
AmitiM.WeiS.-J. (2009). Service offshoring and productivity: Evidence from the US. The World Economy, 32(2)203–220.
2.
AntoniettiR. (2014). From outsourcing to productivity, passing through training: Microeconometric evidence from Italy (Working Paper No. 12.2014).Padova:FEEM.
3.
AntonioliD.MazzantiM.MontresorS.PiniP. (2015). Outsourcing and firm productivity in a specific local production system: Evidence from Reggio Emilia (Italy). Growth and Change, 46(2),292–320.
4.
ArellanoM.BondS.(1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and application to employment equations. Review of Economics Studies, 58(2),277–297.
5.
AtamturkA.HochbaumD. S. (2001). Capacity acquisition, outsourcing, and lot sizing. Management Science,47(8),1081–1100.
6.
AubuchonC.BandyopadhyayS.BhaumikS. K. (2012). The extent and impact of outsourcing: Evidence from Germany. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review,94(4),287–304.
7.
BasantR.FikkertB. (1996). The effects of R&D, foreign technology purchase, and domestic and international spillovers on productivity in Indian firms. Review of Economics and Statistics,78(2),187–199.
8.
BeladiH.DuttaM.KarS. (2016). FDI and business internationalization of the unorganized sector: Evidence from Indian manufacturing. World Development,83,340–349.
9.
BernardA. B. (2006). Firms in international trade (Working Paper No. 13054) .Cambridge, MA:NBER.
10.
BhagwatiJ.PanagariyaA.SrinivasanT. N. (2004). The muddles over outsourcing. The Journal of Economic Perspectives,18(4),93–114.
11.
DavidsonC.MatuszS. (2006). Trade liberalization and compensation. International Economic Review,47(3),723–747.
12.
de GrootH.MöhlmannJ. (2013). The effects of outsourcing on firm productivity: Evidence from microdata in the Netherlands (Discussion Paper No.250).The Hague:CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
13.
DeyM.HousemanS.PolivkaA. (2012). Manufacturers’ outsourcing to staffing services. Industrial and Labor Relations Review,65(3), 533–559.
14.
EggerH.EggerP. (2006). International outsourcing and the productivity of low-skilled labor in the EU. Economic Inquiry,44(1),98–108.
15.
EggerP.PfaffermayrM.Wolfmayr-SchnitzerY. (2001). The international fragmentation of Austrian manufacturing: The effects of outsourcing on productivity and wages. North American Journal of Economics and Finance,12(3),257–272.
16.
EpifaniP. (2003). Trade liberalization, firm performance and labor market outcomes in the developing world: What can we learn from micro-level data?(Policy Research Working Paper No.3063). Washington,DC:World Bank.
17.
FarinasJ. C.LópezA.Martín-MarcosA. (2014). Assessing the impact of domestic outsourcing and offshoring on productivity at the firm level. Applied Economics, 46(15),1814–1828.
18.
GörgH.GreenawayD.KnellerR. (2008). The economic impact of offshoring(GEP Research Report).Nottingham:Leverhulme Centre for Research on Globalization and Economic Policy, University of Nottingham.
19.
GörgH.HanleyA. (2005). International outsourcing and productivity: Evidence from the Irish electronics industry. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 16(2), 255–269.
20.
HasanR. (2002). The impact of imported and domestic technologies on the productivity of firms: Panel data evidence from Indian manufacturing firms. Journal of Development Economics,69(1),23–49.
21.
HayashiM. (2002). The role of outsourcing in SME development in Indonesia: Micro-level evidence from the metal working and machinery industry. Journal of Asian Economics,13(1),1–26.
22.
HolmesJ. (1986). The organization and locational structure of production outsourcing.In ScottA. J.StorperM. (Eds.), Production, work, and territory: The geographical anatomy of industrial capitalism(pp. 80–106).Boston, MA:Allen & Unwin.
23.
ItoB.TomiuraE.WakasugiR. (2011). Offshore outsourcing and productivity: Evidence from Japanese firm-level data disaggregated by tasks. Review of International Economics, 19(3),555–567.
24.
JabbourL. (2010). Offshoring and firm performance: Evidence from French manufacturing industry. World Economy,33(3),507–524.
25.
KuruvillaS.RanganathanA. (2008). Economic development strategies and macro- and micro-level human resource policies: The case of India’s outsourcing industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review,62(1),39–72.
26.
LópezA. (2014). Outsourcing and firm productivity: A production function approach. Empirical Economicsz,47(3),977–998.
27.
MankiwG.ForbesK.RosenH. (2004 February 10). Testimony before the Joint Economic Committee U.S. Congress: ‘The Economic Report of the President’.Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/cea/economic_report_20040210.html
28.
MarjitS.KarS. (2012). Firm heterogeneity, informal wage and good governance. Review of Development Economics,16(4),527–539.
29.
McCannF. (2011). The heterogeneous effect of international outsourcing on firm productivity. Review of World Economics,147(1),85–108.
30.
MinetakiK.MotohashiK. (2009). Outsourcing structure and productivity in the Japanese software industry. The Review of Socionetwork Strategies,3,51–65.
31.
NagarajR. (1984). Sub-contracting in Indian manufacturing industries analysis, evidence and issues. Economic and Political Weekly,19(31/33),1435–1453.
32.
NeureiterM.NunnenkampP. (2010). Outsourcing motives, location choice and labor market implications:An empirical analysis for European countries. Kyklos,63(2),206–230.
33.
PaulC. J. M.YasarM. (2006). Outsourcing, productivity, and input composition at the plant level. Paper presented at International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium. Retrieved from http://iatrc.software.umn.edu/activities/annualmeetings/themedays/pdfs/2006DecMorrison.pdf
34.
RamaswamyK. V. (1999). The search for flexibility in Indian manufacturing: New evidence on outsourcing activities. Economic and Political Weekly,34(6),363–368.
35.
RileyR.YoungG. (2007). Skill heterogeneity and equilibrium unemployment. Oxford Economic Papers,59(4),702–725.
36.
SatoK. (1967). A two-level constant-elasticity-of-substitution production function. Review of Economic Studies, 34(2),201–218.
37.
ShenL. (2017). Global sourcing and credit constraints. Canadian Journal of Economics,50(3),778–803.
38.
TaymazE.KilicaslanY. (2002). Outsourcing dynamics and economic development: A study on textile and engineering industries (ERC Working Papers in Economics No.01/08).Ankara:Middle East Technical University.
39.
tenRaaT. (2011). Benchmarking and industry performance. Journal of Productivity Analysis,36(3),285–292.
40.
tenraa T.WolffE.N. (2001). Outsourcing of services and the productivity recovery in U.S. manufacturing in the 1980s and 1990s. Journal of Productivity Analysis,16(2),149–165.
41.
TomohikoI.NaomiK. (2016). The effects of Japanese customer firms’ overseas outsourcing on supplier firms’ performance (RIETI Discussion Paper Series 16–E−106).Tokyo:RIETI.
42.
UchikawaS. (2011). Linkage between organised and unorganised sectors in Indian machinery industry. Economic and Political Weekly,46(1),45–54.
