The study finds a considerable increase in non-statutory (tied) transfers, particularly evident after the abolition of the Planning Commission. Centrally sponsored schemes (CSS) constitute the largest portion of these non-statutory grants. Although the number of CSS has increased over time, the overall financial allocation has fallen during the last few years. A significant structural shift occurred in 2023–2024: the number of CSS schemes was first raised to 75 and then further to 82, while the previous rationalized categorization of ‘Core of Core’ and ‘Core’ schemes was simultaneously discontinued. The state-wise analysis shows that states such as Kerala, Haryana and Punjab receive the lowest per capita CSS compared to other states. The problem is compounded by implementation issues, as evidenced by the significant gap between the budgeted and actual CSS flows to Kerala.
BirdR. M., & SmartM. (2002). Intergovernmental fiscal transfers: International lessons for developing countries. Word Development, 30(6), 899–912.
2.
ChakrabortyL., & ChakrabortyP. (2018). Federalism, fiscal asymmetries and economic convergence: Evidence from Indian States. Asia Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 2, 88–113.
3.
ChakrabortyP., & GuptaM. (2025). Enhanced devolution and fiscal space at the state level is it an expansion or contraction?Economic & Political Weekly, 60(18), 41–49.
4.
ChakrabortyP., (1998). Growing imbalances in federal fiscal relationship. Economic & Political Weekly, 33(7), 250–354.
5.
DarshiniJ. S., & GayithriK. (2024). Indian fiscal federalism and resource gap of state governments: Measurement and analysis,Review of Development and Change, 29(1), 44–66.
6.
DasS., & MitraS. (2013). Restructuring centrally sponsored schemes: A brief note on the recent policy measures. Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability.
7.
Finance Commission. (2019). Fifteenth Finance Commission report. Government of India.
8.
Government of India. (2025–2026). Union budget 2025–26. Ministry of Finance.
9.
Government of India. (n.d.a). Budget at a glance: Union Budget. Ministry of Finance.
10.
Government of India. (n.d.b). Expenditure profile: Union budget. Ministry of Finance.
11.
Government of Kerala. (n.d.). Budget in brief. Finance Department.
12.
GuptaM., MaheshM., & ChaudaryA. (2025). Finance Commission grants, quantum, conditionalities and absorption. Economic & Political Weekly, 60(18), 66–74.
13.
IsaacT. M., ThomasR., & ChackrobortyM. L. (2019). Challenges to Indian fiscal federalism. Economic & Political Weekly, 54(9), 41–47.
14.
JhaA. N., JalukaY., & ChakrabortyP. (2021). Centrally sponsored schemes: Restructuring and rationalisation. National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
15.
JosephK. J., & KakarlapudiK. K. (2025). Prosperity paradox: Devolution conundrum for the Finance Commission. Economic & Political Weekly, 60(18), 43–51.
16.
KelkarV. (2019). Towards India’s new fiscal federalism, Journal of Quantitative Economics, 17, 237–248.
17.
KohliD. (2024). Political determinants of centre-state transfers: An empirical analysis across Indian states. Journal of Government and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jge.2024.100130
18.
KoleyM., & MandalK. (2019). Vertical fiscal imbalances and its impact on fiscal performance: A case for Indian states. In BandyopadhyayS. & DuttaM. (Eds.), Opportunities and challenges in development (pp. 243–282). Springer Nature.
19.
KumarA. (2022). The limits of constitutionality? Centrally Sponsored Schemes in law and practice. Indian Law Review, 6(3), 247–272.
20.
MohanR., & RamakumarR. (2024). Vertical fiscal imbalances and their amelioration a discussion in the Indian context. Economic & Political Weekly, 59(51), 13–15.
21.
MotkuriV., & RevathiE. (2023). Growth of cess and surcharges in India: With special reference to education cess of union government and its utilisation. Indian Journal of Human Development, 17(3), 518–529
22.
NayakC., & SatpathyP. (2021). Discretionary transfers in Indian federal finance: A panel data analysis. Indian Growth and Development Review, 14(1), 35–49.
23.
RamakumarR (2024). Devolution to states from the net proceeds in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 59(28), 25–28.
24.
RangarajanC., & SrivastavaD. K. (2008). Reforming India’s fiscal transfer system: Resolving vertical and horizontal imbalances. Economic & Political Weekly, 43(23), 47–55.
25.
RaoM. G. (2015). Central transfers to states in India: Rewarding performance while ensuring equity. National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
26.
RaoM. G., & SenT. K. (1995). Fiscal federalism in India: Theory and practice. National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
27.
RaoM. G., & SinghN. (1998). An analysis of explicit and implicit intergovernmental transfers in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 33(31), 2050–2058.
28.
RaoM. G., & SinghN. (2004). Asymmetric federalism in India. National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
29.
SarmaJ. V. M. (1997). Federal fiscal relations in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 32(28), 1783–1789.
30.
SaxenaR., AlishaD., & RounakP., (2023). Centrally sponsored schemes and cooperative federalism in India: A case study of Integrated Child Development Scheme. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 69(2), 261–274.
31.
SrivastavaD. K. (2010). Resolving vertical and fiscal imbalances in India: A task for the sixteenth Finance Commission. The Indian Economic Journal, 73(1) 132–152.
32.
VargheseB., & KumarA. (2023). Structural changes in centrally sponsored schemes and its impact on state finance of Kerala. Kerala Economy, 4(4), 34–41.
