This study examines how institutional effectiveness mediates between economic development and criminal behaviour across jurisdictional boundaries in India’s federal system. Using institutional anomie theory and spatial dynamic panel methods, we analyse five crime categories across 30 states from 2002 to 2021. Our findings reveal striking cross-border spillover effects that conventional analysis misses. Enhanced police capacity in neighbouring states creates asymmetric displacement, reducing murder while increasing crimes against women in adjacent jurisdictions. Correctional policies displace crimes against children and property crimes across boundaries. Educational advantages and unemployment in neighbouring states create vulnerability patterns that increase multiple crime types through strain mechanisms. Economic development generates regional strain effects rather than protective benefits, with neighbouring states’ prosperity substantially increasing murder, crimes against children and property crimes in adjacent jurisdictions. These displacement effects challenge traditional deterrence frameworks, demonstrating that state-level crime control creates unintended consequences that extend across borders. Federal systems require coordinated regional approaches rather than isolated strategies to combat crime effectively.
Al WeswasiE. (2024). Estimating the incapacitation effect among first-time incarcerated offenders. European Journal of Criminology, 21(6), 799–829. https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708241249808
2.
AmirapuA. (2021). Justice delayed is growth denied: The effect of slow courts on relationship-specific industries in India. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 70(1), 415–451. https://doi.org/10.1086/711171
3.
AndersenL. H. (2024). Court delays and criminal recidivism: Results from Danish administrative data and a policy reform. Justice Quarterly, 41(5), 647–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2023.2260451
4.
AndresenM. A. (2015). Unemployment, GDP, and crime: The importance of multiple measurements of the economy. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 57(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.3138/CJCCJ.2013.E37
5.
AndresenM. A., & MallesonN. (2014). Police foot patrol and crime displacement: A local analysis. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 30(2), 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986214525076
BelottiF., HughesG., & MortariA. P. (2017). Spatial panel-data models using stata. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 17(1), 139–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1701700109
8.
BennettP. (2018). The heterogeneous effects of education on crime: Evidence from Danish administrative twin data. Labour Economics, 52, 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2018.02.002
9.
BhattacharjeeA., & Jensen-ButlerC. (2013). Estimation of the spatial weights matrix under structural constraints. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 43(4), 617–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.03.005
10.
BlattmanC., GreenD. P., OrtegaD., & TobónS. (2021). Place-based interventions at scale: The direct and spillover effects of policing and city services on crime. Journal of the European Economic Association, 19(4), 2022–2051. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvab002
11.
BuonannoP., & LeonidaL. (2009). Non-market effects of education on crime: Evidence from Italian regions. Economics of Education Review, 28(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.09.012
12.
CantorD., & LandK. C. (1985). Unemployment and crime rates in the post-world war II United States: A theoretical and empirical analysis. American Sociological Review, 50(3), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095542
13.
Central Statistical Office (CSO). (2011). Report of the committee on crime statistics. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India. https://www.mospi.gov.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/Report_crime_stats_29june11.pdf
14.
ChalfinA., & McCraryJ. (2017). Criminal deterrence: A review of the literature. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(1), 5–48. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20141147
15.
CollazosD., GarcíaE., MejíaD., OrtegaD., & TobónS. (2021). Hot spots policing in a high-crime environment: An experimental evaluation in Medellín. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 17(3), 473–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-019-09390-1
16.
Dalla PellegrinaL. (2008). Court delays and crime deterrence: An application to crimes against property in Italy. European Journal of Law and Economics, 26(3), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-008-9076-4
17.
DalmiaA. (2023). The impact of pending court cases on the efficacy of the judicial system in India: Justice delayed is justice denied. International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research, 08(10), 3086–3104. https://doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2023.v08i10.005
18.
DebnathA., & RoyN. (2013). Linkage between internal migration and crime: Evidence from India. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 41(3), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2013.06.001
19.
DehalA., & PatelM. (2022). Inter-state police cooperation: Challenges, policy framework, and the way forward. Social & Political Research Foundation (SPRF) Issue Brief, 10(22). https://sprf.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ISPC-IB.pdf
20.
De MeloS. N., MatiasL. F., & AndresenM. A. (2015). Crime concentrations and similarities in spatial crime patterns in a Brazilian context. Applied Geography, 62, 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.05.012
21.
Di TellaR., & SchargrodskyE. (2004). Do police reduce crime? Estimates using the allocation of police forces after a terrorist attack. American Economic Review, 94(1), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282804322970733
22.
Directorate General of Employment, Ministry of Labour & Employment, GOI. (2002–2021). Employment exchange statistics. Retrieved from www.ncs.gov.in
23.
Economic and Political Weekly Research Foundation. (2002–2021). India time series. https://epwrfits.in/
24.
EdmarkK. (2005). Unemployment and crime: Is there a connection?The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 107(2), 353–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2005.00412.x
25.
ElhorstJ. P. (2010). Applied spatial econometrics: Raising the bar. Spatial Economic Analysis, 5(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421770903541772
26.
ElhorstJ. P. (2014). Spatial econometrics: From cross-sectional data to spatial panels. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40340-8
27.
FondevilaG., VilaltaC., & MassaR. (2022). On the relationship between police force presence and crime in Mexico: A spatial analysis. Police Practice and Research, 23(2), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2021.1915144
28.
FondevilaG., Vilalta-PerdomoC., Galindo PérezM. C., & CafferataF. G. (2021). Crime deterrent effect of police stations. Applied Geography, 134, 102518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102518
29.
FougèreD., PougetJ., & KramarzF. (2009). Youth unemployment and crime in France. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(5), 909–938. JSTOR.
30.
FoxA. M., OgakiM., & PickeringJ. C. (2020). Beyond police boundaries: Network analysis of multi-jurisdictional crime. Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society, 21(2), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.15.2021.2.360-378
31.
GraifC., FreelinB. N., KuoY.-H., WangH., LiZ., & KiferD. (2021). Network spillovers and neighborhood crime: A computational statistics analysis of employment-based networks of neighborhoods. Justice Quarterly, 38(2), 344–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1602160
32.
HaO. K., & AndresenM. A. (2017). Unemployment and the specialization of criminal activity: A neighborhood analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 48, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.11.001
33.
HoogheM., VanhoutteB., HardynsW., & BircanT. (2011). Unemployment, inequality, poverty and crime: Spatial distribution patterns of criminal acts in Belgium, 2001–06. British Journal of Criminology, 51(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azq067
34.
JohanssonS., & HaandrikmanK. (2023). Gendered fear of crime in the urban context: A comparative multilevel study of women’s and men’s fear of crime. Journal of Urban Affairs, 45(7), 1238–1264. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2021.1923372
35.
JohnsonR., & RaphaelS. (2012). How much crime reduction does the marginal prisoner buy?The Journal of Law and Economics, 55(2), 275–310. https://doi.org/10.1086/664073
36.
JohnsonS. D., GueretteR. T., & BowersK. (2014). Crime displacement: What we know, what we don’t know, and what it means for crime reduction. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(4), 549–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9209-4
37.
JuhlS. (2021). The Wald test of common factors in spatial model specification search strategies. Political Analysis, 29(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2020.23
38.
KalfoglouS., & YükseloğluE. H. (2025). Crime knows no borders: The necessity of international police cooperation. Lectio Socialis, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.47478/lectio.1492496
39.
KrohnM. D. (1976). Inequality, unemployment and crime: A cross-national analysis. The Sociological Quarterly, 17(3), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1976.tb00984.x
40.
LamC., & SouzaP. C. L. (2020). Estimation and selection of spatial weight matrix in a spatial lag model. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 38(3), 693–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2019.1569526
41.
LeivaM., Vasquez-LavínF., & Ponce OlivaR. D. (2020). Do immigrants increase crime? Spatial analysis in a middle-income country. World Development, 126, 104728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104728
42.
LemieuxF. (2018, September). Police cooperation across jurisdictions. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.72
43.
LeSageJ. P. (2008). An introduction to spatial econometrics. Revue d’économie Industrielle, 123(3), 19–44. https://doi.org/10.4000/rei.3887
44.
LeSageJ., & PaceR. K. (2009). Introduction to spatial econometrics. Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420064254
45.
LeviM., & MaguireM. (2004). Reducing and preventing organised crime: An evidence-based critique. Crime, Law and Social Change, 41(5), 397–469. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CRIS.0000039600.88691.af
46.
LevittS. D. (1996). The effect of prison population size on crime rates: Evidence from prison overcrowding litigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(2), 319–351. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946681
47.
LinM.-J. (2007). Does democracy increase crime? The evidence from international data. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(3), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2007.06.001
48.
LiuT., & LeeL. (2019). A likelihood ratio test for spatial model selection. Journal of Econometrics, 213(2), 434–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.07.001
49.
LochnerL. (2004). Education, work, and crime: A human capital approach. International Economic Review, 45(3), 811–843. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-6598.2004.00288.x
50.
LochnerL., & MorettiE. (2004). The effect of education on crime: Evidence from prison inmates, arrests, and self-reports. The American Economic Review, 94(1), 155–189.
51.
MachinS., MarieO., & VujićS. (2011). The crime reducing effect of education. The Economic Journal, 121(552), 463–484.
52.
MessnerS. F., & RosenfeldR. (1994). Crime and the American dream. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
53.
MessnerS. F., ThomeH., & RosenfeldR. (2008). Institutions, anomie, and violent crime: Clarifying and elaborating institutional-anomie theory. International Journal of Conflict and Violence (IJCV), 163–181 Pages. https://doi.org/10.4119/IJCV-2763
54.
MukherjeeC., RustagiP., & KrishnajiN. (2001). Crimes against women in India: Analysis of official statistics. Economic & Political Weekly, 36(43), 4070–4080. JSTOR.
55.
MulambaK. C. (2021). A spatial analysis of property crime rates in South Africa. South African Journal of Economics, 89(3), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/saje.12279
56.
National Crime Records Bureau. (2002–2021a). Crime in India statistics. Ministry of Home Affairs, GOI. https://www.ncrb.gov.in/crime-in-india.html
57.
National Crime Records Bureau. (2002–2021b). Prison statistics India. Ministry of Home Affairs, GOI. https://www.ncrb.gov.in/prison-statistics-india.html
58.
PapachristosA. V., & BastomskiS. (2018). Connected in crime: The enduring effect of neighborhood networks on the spatial patterning of violence. American Journal of Sociology, 124(2), 517–568. https://doi.org/10.1086/699217
59.
PizaE. L., WheelerA. P., ConnealyN. T., & FengS. Q. (2020). Crime control effects of a police substation within a business improvement district: A quasi‐experimental synthetic control evaluation. Criminology & Public Policy, 19(2), 653–684. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12488
60.
RajashekaraH. M. (1997). The nature of Indian federalism: A critique. Asian Survey, 37(3), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2645661
61.
RaphaelS., & Winter‐EbmerR. (2001). Identifying the effect of unemployment on crime. The Journal of Law and Economics, 44(1), 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1086/320275
62.
RecherV. (2020). Unemployment and property crime: Evidence from Croatia. Crime, Law and Social Change, 73(3), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-019-09865-2
63.
SaxenaP. K., & SarojV. K. (2022). Delay in criminal justice system in India: The way forward. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(12), 130–136.
64.
SaxenaR. (2012). Is India a case of asymmetrical federalism?Economic & Political Weekly, 47(2), 70–75.
65.
SchneiderS., & HurstC. (2008). Obstacles to an integrated, joint forces approach to organized crime enforcement: A Canadian case study. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 31(3), 359–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510810895759
66.
SinghM. P. (2001). Towards a more federalized parliamentary system in India: Explaining functional change. Pacific Affairs, 74(4), 553. https://doi.org/10.2307/3557806
67.
SorgE. T., HabermanC. P., RatcliffeJ. H., & GroffE. R. (2013). Foot patrol in violent crime hot spots: The longitudinal impact of deterrence and posttreatment effects of displacement. Criminology, 51(1), 65–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00290.x
68.
StakhovychS., & BijmoltT. H. A. (2009). Specification of spatial models: A simulation study on weights matrices. Papers in Regional Science, 88(2), 389–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2008.00213.x
69.
TitaG., & RidgewayG. (2007). The impact of gang formation on local patterns of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44(2), 208–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427806298356
70.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2019). Global study on homicide 2019: Booklet 1 – Killing of men and women by intimate partners or other family members. United Nations. https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/gsh/Booklet1.pdf
71.
VerneyD. V. (1995). Federalism, federative systems, and federations: The United States, Canada, and India. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 25(2), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a038197
