Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Determinants of Vocational Education and Training (VET) Participation in India: Exploring the Role of Education and Gender Using a Multinomial Logit Approach
This study examines the factors influencing participation in Vocational Education and Training (VET) in India, using a multinomial logit model with a focus on interaction effects. Drawing on data from the nationally representative National Sample Survey and Periodic Labour Force Survey, the analysis considers individual characteristics, educational background, household factors and job-related attributes to understand their impact on VET enrolment. Additionally, the study explores how the interaction between education level and gender shapes participation patterns. The findings reveal that multiple factors significantly influence individuals’ decisions to engage in VET programmes, with general education being one of the most critical determinants. Notably, general education also acts as a moderator between gender and VET participation, highlighting the complex interplay between these variables. By identifying key factors associated with VET participation, it provides a scope for designing effective policy interventions.
AgrawalT. (2012). Vocational education and training in India: Challenges, status and labour market outcomes. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 64(4), 453–474.
2.
AgrawalT., & AgrawalA. (2017). Vocational education and training in India: A labour market perspective. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 69(2), 246–265.
3.
AhmedT. (2016a). Labour market outcome for formal vocational education and training in India: Safety net and beyond. IIMB Management Review, 28(2), 98–110.
4.
AhmedT. (2016b). Socio-economic impact of VET: Are students interested in joining vocational education and training in India—in the context of skilling mission in India. In PilzM. (Ed.), India: Preparation for the world of work (pp. 331–344). Springer.
5.
AltinokN. (2012). General versus vocational education: Some new evidence from PISA 2009 [Technical Report No. 2012/ED/EFA/MRT/PI/18]. UNES.
6.
AtewologunD. (2018). Intersectionality theory and practice. InOxford research encyclopedia of business and management. Oxford University Press.
7.
BeckerR. (2019). Economic change and continuous vocational training in the work history: A longitudinal multilevel analysis of the employees’ participation in further training and the effects on their occupational careers in Germany, 1970–2008. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-019-0079-x
8.
BediJ. S., & SinghA. (2022). Consistency in NSSO employment–unemployment estimates using NSS 68th Round and PLFS Data. Economic & Political Weekly, 57(46), 37–44.
9.
BishtN., & PattanaikF. (2020). Youth labour market in India: Education, employment, and sustainable development goals. In AmineS. (Ed.), International perspectives on the youth labor market: Emerging research and opportunities (pp. 172–196). IGI Global.
10.
Cedefop (2011). Vocational education and training at higher levels. Publications Office of the European Union.
11.
ChenoyD. (2016). Skill development in India: A transformation in the making. In India infrastructure report 2012 (1st ed., pp. 237–245). Routledge. https://doi.org/ 10.4324/9781315538914
12.
ChevalierA., HarmonC., WalkerI., & ZhuY. (2004). Does education raise productivity, or just reflect it?The Economic Journal, 114, F499–F517. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00256.x
13.
Government of India. (2015). National Policy for Skill Development and Entrepreneurship 2015. Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship.
14.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
15.
JamalT., & MandalK. (2013). Skill development mission in vocational areas–mapping government initiatives. Current Science, 104(5), 590–595.
16.
KoshyP., WebbS., DockeryA. M., & KnightE. (2020). Bachelor degree participation in vocational institutions: Examining the determinants of participation. International Journal of Training Research, 18(2), 106–120.
17.
KumarR., MandavaS., & GopanapalliV. S. (2019). Vocational training in India: Determinants of participation and effect on wages. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 11(1), 1–17.
18.
LischewskiJ., SeeberS., WuttkeE., & RosemannT. (2020). What influences participation in non-formal and informal modes of continuous vocational education and training? An analysis of individual and institutional influencing factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 534485. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.534485
19.
McGrathS., Alla-MensahJ., & LangthalerM. (2018). Skills for decent work, life and sustainable development: Vocational education and the sustainable development goals. [ÖFSE Briefing Paper No. 18]. Austrian Foundation for Development Research.
20.
MehrotraS., GandhiA., & SahooB. K. (2013). Estimating India’s skill gap: On a realistic basis for 2022. Economic & Political Weekly, 48(13), 102–111.
21.
Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship (MSDE). (2018). Annual Report 2017–2018: Progressing towards and empowered India. https://www.msde.gov.in/static/uploads/2024/02/Annual-Report-2017-2018-English.pdf
22.
MoenjakT., & WorswickC.. (2003). Vocational education in Thailand: A study of choice and returns. Economics of Education Review, 22(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(01)00059- 0
23.
OakesJ. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. Yale University Press.
24.
PilzM., & RegelJ. (2021). Vocational education and training in India: Prospects and challenges from an outside perspective. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 15(1), 101–121.
25.
RagethL., & RenoldU. (2019). The linkage between the education and employment systems: Ideal types of vocational education and training programs. Journal of Education Policy, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1605541
26.
SharmaS., DurandR. M., & Gur-ArieO. (1981). Identification and analysis of moderator variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 291–300.
27.
ThangaveluS. M., HaomingL., CheolsungP., HengA. B., & WongJ. (2011). The determinants of training participation in Singapore. Applied Economics, 43(29), 4641–4649.
28.
TilakJ. B. G. (2003). Vocational education and training in Asia. KeevesJ. P. & WatanabeR. (Ed.), International handbook of educational research in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 673–686). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3368-7_46
29.
VincentA., & RajasekharD. (2021). Who participates in vocational education and training in India? An analysis of socio-economic determinants. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 75(5), 890–909.
30.
Wheebox. (2021). India skills report 2021. https://indiaeducationforum.org/pdf/ISR-2021.pdf
31.
World Bank. (2008). Skill development in India: The vocational education and training system. Human Development Sector, World Bank.
32.
ZedeckS. (1971). Problems with the use of ‘moderator’ variables. Psychological Bulletin, 76(4), 295.
