This study empirically examines the relationship between different forms of sustainable livelihood capital and livelihood outcomes, measured as the income and expenditure capacity of peasant households in China. Overall, the results show that land and human capital are the most important determinants of expenditure-based livelihood outcomes, while other forms of capital play significantly smaller roles. In contrast, for farm income, land and technology play a greater role, highlighting the critical need to improve land productivity and promote technological upgrading. We also observe regional heterogeneity in the impact of livelihood capitals on livelihood outcomes, indicating that these effects are not uniform. Therefore, it is critical for policymakers to consider land reform to create a more efficient land market, prioritize investment in human capital and modernization, and account for regional differences to promote a more balanced development path across regions.
BarrettC. B., Ghezzi-KopelK., HoddinottJ., HomamiN., TennantE., UptonJ., & WuT. (2021). A scoping review of the development resilience literature: Theory, methods and evidence. World Development, 146, 105612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105612
2.
BeamanL., & DillonA. (2018). Diffusion of agricultural information within social networks: Evidence on gender inequalities from Mali. Journal of Development Economics, 133, 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.01.009
3.
BenYishayA., & MobarakA. M. (2019). Social learning and incentives for experimentation and communication. The Review of Economic Studies, 86(3), 976–1009. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdy039
4.
BorrasS. M.Jr, & FrancoJ. C. (2024). Land rush. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2024.2317961
5.
ChambersR., & ConwayG. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st Century. Institute of Development Studies (UK).
6.
ChayaW., & GheewalaS. H. (2022). Sustainable livelihood outcomes, causal mechanisms and indicators self-determined by Thai farmers producing bioethanol feedstocks. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 29, 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.10.030
7.
ConwayS. F., McDonaghJ., FarrellM., & KinsellaA. (2016). Cease agricultural activity forever? Underestimating the importance of symbolic capital. Journal of Rural Studies, 44, 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.01.016
8.
CuiH., WangY., WangW., & LiuC. (2025). Rural households’ livelihood transitions in China: Processes, drivers and outcomes. China Agricultural Economic Review, 17(1), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1108/CAER-11-2023-0346
9.
De HaanL., & ZoomersA. (2005). Exploring the frontier of livelihoods research. Development and Change, 36(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0012-155X.2005.00401.x
10.
EllisF. (2000). The determinants of rural livelihood diversification in developing countries. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51(2), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2000.tb01229.x
11.
FallatahR. H. M., & SyedJ. (2018). A critical review of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. In FallatahR. H. M. & SyedJ. (Eds.), Employee motivation in Saudi Arabia: An investigation into the higher education sector (pp. 19–59). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67741-5_2
12.
FanY., ShiX., LiX., & FengX. (2022). Livelihood resilience of vulnerable groups in the face of climate change: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environmental Development, 44, Article 100777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2022.100777
13.
Food and Agriculture, Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, International Fund for Agricultural Development, United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund, World Food Programme, & Organization, W. H. (2020). In brief to the state of food security and nutrition in the world 2020.
14.
GillerK. E., DelauneT., SilvaJ. V., DescheemaekerK., van de VenG., SchutA. G. T., van WijkM., HammondJ., HochmanZ., TaulyaG., ChikowoR., NarayananS., KishoreA., BrescianiF., TeixeiraH. M., AnderssonJ. A., & van IttersumM. K. (2021). The future of farming: Who will produce our food?Food Security, 13(5), 1073–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-021-01184-6
15.
GollinD., HansenC. W., & WingenderA. M. (2021). Two blades of grass: The impact of the green revolution. Journal of Political Economy, 129(8), 2344–2384. https://doi.org/10.1086/714444
16.
GongB. (2020). Agricultural productivity convergence in China. China Economic Review, 60, 101423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101423
17.
GranovetterM. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
18.
GuoR., ZhangJ., & ZhouM. (2024). The demography of the great migration in China. Journal of Development Economics, 167, 103235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2023.103235
19.
HagedoornJ. (2006). Understanding the cross-level embeddedness of interfirm partnership formation. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 670–680. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.21318924
HerrendorfB., & SchoellmanT. (2018). Wages, human capital, and barriers to structural transformation. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 10(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20160236
22.
HuangJ. (2022). China’s rural transformation and policies: Past experience and future directions. Engineering, 18, 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2022.03.011
23.
HymanH. H., WrightC. R., & ReedJ. S. (1975). The enduring effects of education. University of Chicago Press.
24.
IversenV., KrishnaA., & SenK. (2021). Social mobility in developing countries: Concepts, methods, and determinants. Oxford University Press.
25.
KelleyL. C., PelusoN. L., CarlsonK. M., & AfiffS. (2020). Circular labor migration and land-livelihood dynamics in Southeast Asia’s concession landscapes. Journal of Rural Studies, 73, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.11.019
26.
KimJ., & ChoksawatpaisanS. (2023). The long-run effects of education privatization on labour productivity. In Proceedings of the Erasmus Scientific Days 2022 (ESD 2022) (pp. 51–63). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-036-7_6
27.
KuckertzA., KollmannT., KrellP., & StöckmannC. (2017). Understanding, differentiating, and measuring opportunity recognition and opportunity exploitation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(1), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-12-2015-0290
28.
KumarA., KumarA., KumariS., KumariN., KumariS., & MishraP. (2023). Sustainable livelihoods a foundation for rural development leads to sustainability. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 18(2), 128–140. https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.3951
29.
KumarS., SenguptaK., & GogoiB. J. (2023). Interventions for sustainable livelihoods: A review of evidence and knowledge gaps. International Journal of Social Economics, 50(4), 556–574. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijse-06-2022-0402
30.
LanX., ZhangQ., XueH. L., LiangH. G., WangB. J., & WangW. J. (2021). Linking sustainable livelihoods with sustainable grassland use and conservation: A case study from rural households in a semi-arid grassland area, China. Land Use Policy, 101, Article 105186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105186
31.
LiS.-P., DongY.-Q., ZhangL.-X., & LiuC.-f. (2021). Off-farm employment and poverty alleviation in rural China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 20(4), 943–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(21)63616-X
32.
LiX. D., HanY., LiX. M., LiuS. N., MiQ., & GaoJ. Z. (2022). Review of China’s rural land management system reform: 1949–2019. Environmental Earth Sciences, 81(14), 369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10494-7
33.
LiuJ. (2011). Human capital, migration and rural entrepreneurship in China. Indian Growth and Development Review, 4(2), 100–122. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538251111172023
34.
LiuY. S., GuoY. Z., & ZhouY. (2018). Poverty alleviation in rural China: Policy changes, future challenges and policy implications. China Agricultural Economic Review, 10(2), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1108/CAER-10-2017-0192
35.
LongN. (2001). Development sociology: Actor perspectives (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203398531
36.
MaslowA. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
37.
McLeodS. (2007). Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Simply Psychology, 1(1–18).
38.
NatarajanN., NewshamA., RiggJ., & SuhardimanD. (2022). A sustainable livelihoods framework for the 21st century. World Development, 155, 105898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105898
39.
NyeC. (2021). The farm worker and the ‘drift to the land’. Roots, routes, opportunities and constraints to career pathways in farming. Journal of Rural Studies, 83, 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.11.004
40.
OberlackC., TejadaL., MesserliP., RistS., & GigerM. (2016). Sustainable livelihoods in the global land rush? Archetypes of livelihood vulnerability and sustainability potentials. Global Environmental Change, 41, 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.001
41.
PengK., YangC., & ChenY. (2020). Land transfer in rural China: Incentives, influencing factors and income effects. Applied Economics, 52(50), 5477–5490. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2020.1764484
42.
QuandtA. (2018). Measuring livelihood resilience: The household livelihood resilience approach (HLRA). World Development, 107, 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.02.024
43.
RossiF. (2020). Human capital and macroeconomic development: A review of the evidence. World Bank Research Observer, 35(2), 227–262. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkaa002
44.
SarkerM. N. I., CaoQ., WuM., HossinM. A., AlamG. M. M., & ShouseR. C. (2019). Vulnerability and livelihood resilience in the face of natural disaster: A critical conceptual review. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17(6), 12769–12785. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1706_1276912785
45.
SchultzT. W. (1964). Transforming traditional agriculture. Yale University Press.
46.
ScoonesI. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis. IDS Working Paper (No. 72).
47.
ScoonesI. (2009). Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(1), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150902820503
48.
SenA. (1993). Capability and well-being. In NussbaumM. C. & SenA. (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 30–53). Oxford University Press.
49.
SenA. (1997). Choice, welfare, and measurement. Harvard University Press.
50.
ShikukuK. M. (2019). Information exchange links, knowledge exposure, and adoption of agricultural technologies in northern Uganda. World Development, 115, 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.11.012
51.
SmallL.-A. (2007). The sustainable rural livelihoods approach: A critical review. Canadian Journal of Development Studies-Revue Canadienne D Etudes Du Developpement, 28(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2007.9669186
52.
TambeS. (2022). Evolution of rural livelihood approaches. In TambeS. (Ed.), Teaching and learning rural livelihoods: A guide for educators, students, and practitioners (pp. 3–13). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90491-3_1
53.
TianW., WangZ., & ZhangQ. (2024). Land allocation and industrial agglomeration: Evidence from the 2007 reform in China. Journal of Development Economics, 171, 103351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2024.103351
54.
WangJ., HuY., & XiongJ. (2024). The internet use, social networks, and entrepreneurship: Evidence from China. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 36(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2026317
55.
WangS., BaiX., ZhangX., ReisS., ChenD., XuJ., & GuB. (2021). Urbanization can benefit agricultural production with large-scale farming in China. Nature Food, 2(3), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00228-6
56.
YangF., LiuW., & WenT. (2022). The rural household’s entrepreneurship under the land certification in China. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2091088. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2091088
57.
YaoS., & FuZ. (2023). Can digital transformation promote the improvement of regional food security? Empirical findings from China. Agribusiness, 41(1), 184–216. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21881
58.
ZhangQ. F., & WuM. (2024). The decline and transformation of smallholders in Chinese agriculture: National trends. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2024.2392688
59.
ZhangX., & FanD. (2023). Can agricultural digital transformation help farmers increase income? An empirical study based on thousands of farmers in Hubei Province. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 26(6), 14405–14431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03200-5
60.
ZhangY., TsaiC.-H., & ChungC.-C. (2024). Evolution of land system reforms in China: Dynamics of stakeholders and policy transitions toward sustainable farmland use (2004–2019). Heliyon, 10(17). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37471
61.
ZhouY., LiX., & LiuY. (2020). Rural land system reforms in China: History, issues, measures and prospects. Land Use Policy, 91, 104330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104330
