The Philippines’ prolonged spell as a lower middle-income country has been a longstanding mystery in economic development. This article argues that the ‘Agricultural Trap’ is a key piece of the puzzle. The agricultural trap is characterized by low levels of transformation of agriculture, as well as slow structural change of the economy. Historically, the Philippine economy has undergone considerable evolution; nonetheless, by some indicators, the Philippine economy and agriculture remain in a relatively backward state. In recent decades, the Philippines has been unusually slow in its ability to increase agricultural output while reallocating workers away from agriculture. This in turn is driven by slow rates of growth of total factor productivity and capital formation, persistent farmholding fragmentation, inability to diversify the structure of agricultural output, and significant producer support for food import substitutes. Escaping the agricultural trap requires the pursuit of a modern agro-industrial policy.
AcemogluD., & GuerrieriV. (2008). Capital deepening and nonbalanced economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 116(3), 467–498.
2.
AdamopoulosT., & RestucciaD. (2020). Land reform and productivity: A quantitative analysis with micro data. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 12(3), 1–39.
3.
Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2024). ADB key indicators. https://kidb.adb.org/
4.
BalisacanA., & HillH. (2003). An introduction to the key issues. In BalisacanA. & HillH. (Eds.), The Philippine economy: Development, policies, and challenges. (pp. 1–28). Oxford University Press.
5.
BrionesR. (2023a). How modern is Philippine agriculture and fisheries? Synthesis. In BrionesR. (Ed.), How modern is Philippine agriculture? The agriculture and fisheries modernization act after a quarter century (Ch. 11, pp. 161–174). Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
6.
BrionesR. (2023b). Market and state in Philippine agricultural policy. In BrionesR. (Ed.), How modern is Philippine agriculture? The agriculture and fisheries modernization act after a quarter century (Ch. 2). PIDS.
7.
BrionesR. (2023c). Enhancing profits and incomes in agriculture and fisheries. In BrionesR. (Ed.), How modern is Philippine agriculture? The agriculture and fisheries modernization act after a quarter century (Ch. 8). PIDS.
8.
ClarkC. (1940). The conditions of economic progress. Macmillan.
9.
CominD., LashkariD., & MestieriM. (2021). Structural change with long-run income and price effects. Econometrica, 89(1), 311–374.
10.
De DiosE., & WilliamsonJ. (2015). Deviant behavior: A century of Philippine industrialization (Ch. 21). In BalisacanA., ChakravortyU., & RavagoM.-L. (Eds.), Sustainable economic development: Resources, environment and institutions. Academic Press.
11.
FelipeJ., EstradaG., & LanzafameM. (2021). The turnaround in Philippine growth: From disappointment to promising success. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 62(1), 327–342.
12.
Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO). (2024). FAOStat. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
LarsonD., & BloodworthK. (2023). Mechanization and the intersectoral migration of agricultural labor. In EstudilloJ., KijimaY., & SonobeT. (Eds.), Agricultural development in Asia and Africa: Essays in honor of Keijiro Otsuka. Springer Nature.
15.
LewisA. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labor. Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 22(2), 139–191.
16.
MartinsP. (2019). Structural change: Pace, patterns and determinants. Review of Development Economics, 23(1), 1–32.
17.
McMillanM., RodrikD., & Verduzco-GalloI. (2014). Globalization, structural change, and productivity growth, with an update on Africa. World Development, 63(1), 11–32.
18.
National Economic Development Authority (NEDA). (1959). Three-year program of economic and social development. NEDA.
19.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2024). OECD data: Agricultural policy. https://data.oecd.org/agriculture.htm#profile-Agricultural%20policy
20.
RanisG., & FeiJ. (1961). A theory of economic development. American Economic Review, 51(4), 533–565.
21.
RestucciaD., & RogersonR. (2017). The causes and costs of misallocation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(3), 151–174.
22.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). (2024). International agricultural productivity. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/international-agricultural-productivity/
23.
UsuiN. (2011). Taking the right road to inclusive growth: Industrial upgrading and diversification in the Philippines. Asian Development Bank.
24.
WarrP. (2022). Beyond Krugman: The importance of agriculture for East Asian growth. In HillH., RavagoM., & RoumassetJ. (Eds.), Pro-poor development policies: Lessons from the Philippines and East Asia. ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.
25.
WeissE., KarA., NashJ., JaffeeS., FornoD., BrionesR., QuinonesM. T., Figueroa-GeronC., & MacandogP. (2021). Realizing scale in smallholder-based agriculture: Policy options for the Philippines (English). World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/741391625758351866/Realizing-Scale-in-Smallholder-Based-Agriculture-Policy-Options-for-the-Philippines
