A state produces political space and uses this space as a privileged instrument to impose its rationality. A high-modernist state commences ‘prescribing’ and ‘imposing’ to establish a ‘new society’, thus adhering to a tabula rasa (blank slate) approach in policies and planning. It denounces the past as a model to ameliorate the present, disregarding local conditions and knowledge, and perpetuating visual images that promise an alchemised future. In a typical spatial understanding of the state, the standard marker of growth is perceivably developing infrastructure. The article intends to do a spatial and temporal reading of the Colombo Port City (CPC) project, deemed to perceivably transform the Sri Lankan urban economic landscape, as a case study. The article conducted an ethnographic study of the project, locating it in Harvey’s ‘spatial fix’, Scott’s High Modernism and Guy Debord’s concept of spectacle to comprehend the larger spatial politics that an infrastructure project exhibits. Considering Colombo as a case study, the article shall also examine infrastructure’s political affect and how spatial reconfigurations rearrange government institutions as the infrastructure impacts and alters the nature of power. It will critically examine the modality of the investments in infrastructure, its internal politics and its much fetishized economic feasibility.
AsadaR. (2020). Growth with rural development: Sri Lanka’s serendipitous contribution in an age of SDGs [Background Paper for the World Social Report 2021].
2.
BanerjeeB. (2022, 20March). Colombo opening doors for Indian investors. The Pioneer.
3.
CBoSL. (2021). Issue of commemorative coins to mark the 65th anniversary of Sri Lanka–China diplomatic relations and 100th anniversary of communist party of China. Central Bank of Sri Lanka. Retrieved 13February2022: https://www.cbsl.gov.lk/en/news/commemorative-coin-65th-anniversary-sl-china-100th-anniversary-communist-party-china
4.
CBoSL. (2023). Sri Lanka socio-economic data 2022. Statistics Department, Central Bank of Sri Lanka.
5.
China Communications Construction Company (CCCC). (2019). Social responsibility report 2018-2019.
6.
CCCC. (2021). First quarterly report 2021.
7.
CCCC. (2022). Background information. Retrieved,10January2022, from http://en.ccccltd.cn/tzzgx/jbxx/bjxx/201011/t20101111_139213.html
8.
China Daily. (2014). Presidents launch port city project. Retrieved, 4June2022, from https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2014xisco/2014-09/18/content_18617323.htm
9.
CPCC. (2022). Building a world class city for South Asia. Retrieved, 5January2022, from https://www.portcitycolombo.lk/about/
10.
DebordG. (1970). Society of the spectacle, Black and Red.
11.
DelphineP. W., & SpitT. (2019). Megaprojects: An anatomy of perception: Local people’s perceptions of megaprojects: The case of Suramadu, Indonesia. DisP – The Planning Review, 55(2), 63–77.
12.
EthirajanA. (2022). Colombo port city: A new Dubai or a Chinese enclave?BBC. Retrieved, 21January2022, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-59993386
13.
FrancisK. (2022, 30May). Sri Lanka PM invites protesting youth to join governance. The Diplomat.
14.
FanonF. (1963). Wretched of the earth. Grove Press.
15.
GellnerE. (1981). Nationalism. Theory and Society, 10(6), 753–776. http://www.jstor.org/stable/657332
16.
Government of Sri Lanka (GoSL). (2021). Colombo Port City Economic Commission Act, No. 11 of 2021. Parliament of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, Colombo.
17.
Government of Sri Lanka (GoSL). (2022). Budget Estimates-2002.
18.
HarveyD. (1978). The urban process under capitalism: A framework for analysis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2(1–3), 101–131.
19.
HarveyD. (1982). The limits to capital. Blackwell.
20.
HarveyD. (1990). The condition of postmodernity. Blackwell.
21.
HarveyD. (2001). Globalisation and the ‘spatial fix’. Geographische Revue: Zeitschrift Für Literatur und Diskussion, 3(2), 23–30.
22.
HarveyP., & KnoxH. (2015). Roads: An anthropology of infrastructure and expertise. Cornell University Press.
23.
HetheringtonK. (2017). Surveying the future perfect: Anthropology, development and the promise of infrastructure. In HarveyP., JensenC. B. & MoritaA. (Eds), Infrastructures and social complexity a companion. Routledge.
24.
Hindustan Times. (2022). ‘Every second you protest, we lose dollars’: Lankan PM’s appeal to citizens. Retrieved, 4June2022, from https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/every-second-you-protest-we-lose-dollars-lankan-pm-mahinda-rajapaksa-appeal-to-citizens-101649686870965.html
25.
Implications of Blue Economy in Sri Lanka, Advisory Opinion. (2020). International Jury Verdict, Independent People’s Tribunal.
26.
KeatingM. (1991). Economic development in the European Community: Theory and practice. Edward Elgar Publishing.
27.
LowS. (2016). Spatialising culture: The ethnography of space and place. Taylor & Francis.
28.
MendisR. (2019). Sri Lanka’s urban-centred development trajectory: Implications for rights-based development policy. Global Campus of Human Rights (European Union).
29.
MooreM. (1984). Categorising space: Urban‐rural or core‐periphery in Sri Lanka. The Journal of Development Studies, 20(3), 102–122.
30.
NambaM. (2017). Becoming a city: Infrastructural fetishism and scattered urbanisation in Vientiane, Laos. In HarveyP., JensenC. B. & MoritaA. (Eds), Infrastructures and social complexity a companion. Routledge.
31.
NewsWire. (2021). China to rectify name board violating SL language policy. Retrieved, 19February2022, from https://www.newswire.lk/2021/05/17/china-to-rectify-name-board-violating-sl-language-policy/
32.
PanchaliR. A. P., & GunawardanaA. (2021). Sri Lanka’s port city economic commission act: A social-legal insight [Working Paper]. Institute of South Asian Studies.
33.
PatrickA. (2016). Revival of Colombo port city project: Implications for India. Retrieved, 15November2020, from https://maritimeindia.org/revival-of-colombo-port-city-project-implications-for-india/
34.
POREG. (2022). China’s Colombo port city in hot waters again. Retrieved, 15March2022, from https://www.poreg.org/chinas-colombo-port-city-in-hot-waters-again/
35.
RadicatiA. (2017). Hub city: Aspiration and dispossession in 21st century Colombo [Doctoral dissertation, London School of Economics].
36.
RadicatiA. (2021). Crisis, conjuncture and concrete politics: Ethnographic notes on the Colombo Port city project. Lecture delivered on 10November2021 at the King’s College.
37.
RamakrishnanT. (2021, 17November). Protests against China-funded Colombo port city project continue. The Hindu.
38.
RasamanickamS. R. (2021). Colombo Port City. Retrieved, 2December2021, from https://twitter.com/ShanakiyanR/status/1394253016803385352
39.
SatishD. (2020). How China beat local Sri Lankan media to break news of PM Rajapaksa’s son’s new assignment. (Online: web) Retrieved, 2October2021, from https://www.news18.com/news/world/how-china-beat-local-sri-lankan-media-to-break-news-of-pm-rajapaksas-sons-new-assignment-2977697.html
40.
ScottJ. C. (1998). Seeing like state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
41.
SivaramK. (2016). Locked-in’ to China: The Colombo port city project. Stanford University.
42.
SrinivasanM. (2021, 22May). Amid Twitter spat, move to replace Mandarin board in Sri Lanka. The Hindu.
43.
The Economic Times. (2015). Chinese firm claims heavy losses after Sri Lanka halts port project. Retrieved, 19June2021, from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/world-news/chinese-firm-claims-heavy-losses-after-sri-lanka-halts-port-project/articleshow/46539400.cms
44.
The Sunday Times. (2021, 27June). Lanka issuing coin to mark Chinese communist party’s centenary.
45.
WeszkalnysG. (2017). Infrastructure as gesture. In HarveyP., JensenC. B. & MoritaA. (Eds.). Infrastructures and social complexity a companion. Routledge.
46.
WignarajaG., CollinsA., & HüttemannA. (2020). Port City SEZ: A catalyst for modern services in Sri Lanka. Lakshman Kadirgamar Institute of International Relations and Strategic Studies.
