Do voters punish political parties for unsatisfactory performance on issues and traits the parties are expected to excel at? Issue and trait ownership theories stipulate that parties establish reputations regarding policy issues and attributes; voters then reward or punish the party depending on how much voter expectations were met. However, reactions to politicians’ performances may vary depending on voters’ moral intuitions and party affiliations. Analyzing survey and news data on the 2021 mayoral byelection in Seoul, South Korea, we find that party reputation and the expectation gap affected votes. Also, as moral foundations theory (MFT) suggests, differing moral priorities of liberal and conservative voters explain variation in responses to ethical violations. Our findings suggest the applicability of the party ownership framework and MFT in a newer, non-Western democracy. This study contributes to our understanding of voting behaviour in South Korea, with an emphasis on reputation, expectation gaps and moral intuitions.
AhnC. (2021, March25). Joo Ho-young, ‘I am confident we will win… Democratic Party should be judged for sex crimes’ (Trans.). The 300, Money Today. https://the300.mt.co.kr/newsView.html?no=2021032511434349040
2.
AnsolabehereS., & IyengarS. (1994). Riding the wave and claiming ownership over issues. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58(3), 335–357.
3.
BaeJ. (2021, April6). Oh Se-hoon ‘The hypocritical government must be judged by votes’ (Trans.). MBC News. https://imnews.imbc.com/replay/2021/nwdesk/article/6141404_34936.html
4.
BaikW. (2021, April6). From single candidacy agreement to pollack soup… The by-election viewed by keyword (Trans.). SBS News. https://news.sbs.co.kr/news/endPage.do?news_id=N1006270421
5.
BBC. (2020, July13). Seoul Mayor Park Won-soon accused of four years of sexual harassment. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-53386165
6.
BudgeI., & FarlieD. (1983). Explaining and predicting elections. Allen & Urwin.
7.
ChoY. (2018). Evaluation on the Moon Jae-in Government’s economic policies. Economy and Society, 12, 134–157. (in Korean)
8.
ChoeS. (2019, October21). Coddling of ‘Gold-Spoon’ children shakes South Korea’s political Elite. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/21/world/asia/south-korea-cho-kuk-gold-spoon-elite.html
9.
ChoeS. (2020, July10). ‘I’m sorry to everyone’: In death, South Korean mayor is tainted by scandal. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/10/world/asia/seoul-mayor-dead.html
10.
ChoeS. (2021a, March23). ‘The den of thieves’: South Koreans are furious over housing scandal. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/23/world/asia/korea-housing-lh-scandal-moon-election.html
11.
ChoeS. (2021b, April7). Election rout signals a shift in South Korea’s political scene. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/07/world/asia/korea-mayor-election-moon-oh-sehoon.html
12.
ChoiH. (2018). Perceptions of issue ownership and party choice: A case of the Korean legislative election, 2016. Legislative Studies, 53(0), 171–202.
13.
ChungE., & YiJ. (2021). Pandemic priorities: The impact of South Korea’s COVID-19 policies on vulnerable populations. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(11–12), 1028–1038. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1922440
14.
CliffordS., IyengarV., CabezaR., & Sinnott-ArmstrongW. (2015). Moral foundations vignettes: A standardized stimulus database of scenarios based on moral foundations theory. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1178–1198.
15.
CollierD. (2011). Understanding process tracing. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(4), 823–830. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001429
16.
ConroyM., MartinD. J., & NalderK. L. (2020). Gender, sex, and the role of stereotypes in evaluations of Hillary Clinton and the 2016 presidential candidates. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 41(2), 194–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2020.1731280
17.
CrasnowS. (2017). Process tracing in political science: What’s the story?Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 62, 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.03.002
18.
DaltonR. J., & WeldonS. (2007). Partisanship and party system institutionalization. Party Politics, 13(2), 179–196.
19.
DittmarK. (2016). Watching election 2016 with a gender lens. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49(4), 807–812. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096516001554
20.
DownsA. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Harper Collins.
21.
EganP. J. (2013). Partisan priorities: How issue ownership drives and distorts American politics. Cambridge University Press.
22.
EnelowJ. M., & HinichM. J. (1984). An introduction to the spatial theory of voting. Cambridge University Press.
23.
FaircloughG. (2004, April14). Generation Why? The 386ers of Korea question old rules. Wall Street Journal (sec. News). https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB108189445695281806
24.
FerrierK. (2020, July23). President moon hits another hurdle in curbing South Korea’s housing market. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2020/07/president-moon-hits-another-hurdle-in-curbing-south-koreas-housing-market/
25.
FunkC. L. (1996). The impact of scandal on candidate evaluations: An experimental test of the role of candidate traits. Political Behavior, 18(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498658
26.
GrahamJ., HaidtJ., & NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046.
27.
GrahamJ., NosekB. A., HaidtJ., IyerR., KolevaS., & DittoP. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
28.
GogginS. N., & TheodoridisA. G. (2017). Disputed ownership: Parties, issues, and traits in the minds of voters. Political Behavior, 39(3), 675–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9375-3
29.
GungwuW. (2010). Party and nation in Southeast Asia. Millennial Asia, 1(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/097639961000100103
30.
HahmC. (2008). South Korea’s miraculous democracy. Journal of Democracy, 19(3), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.0.0005
31.
HaidtJ. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
32.
HaidtJ., & HershM. A. (2001). Sexual morality: The cultures and emotions of conservatives and liberals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(1), 191–221.
33.
HanK. (2021, April3). Opposition party, ‘The National Election Commission, which shuts people’s mouths, is in effect recognizing that the “democratic party = hypocrisy, incompetence, and negligence”’ (Trans.). Digital Times. www.dt.co.kr/contents.html?article_no=2021040302109958051002
34.
Hankook Research. (2021). The National barometer survey. National Election Survey Deliberation Commission. https://www.nesdc.go.kr/files/result/202105/FILE_202104151121570701.pdf.htm
35.
HayesD. (2005). Candidate qualities through a partisan lens: A theory of trait ownership. American Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 908–923.
36.
HigginsT. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319–340.
37.
HolianD. B. (2004). He’s stealing my issues! Clinton’s crime rhetoric and the dynamics of issue ownership. Political Behavior, 26(2), 95–124. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POBE.0000035959.35567.16
38.
HurS. J. (2014). Life-cycle, generation, and party identification analyzing pooled cross-sectional data 1986~2012. Korean Party Studies Review, 13(1), 65–93.
39.
HyunJ. (2021). The Korean party system after democratization, how will it be viewed?: Evaluation of the level of institutionalization of the party system from the perspective of electoral volatility. Korean Political Science Review, 55(5/6), 5–33.
40.
ImJ. (2021, April20). Victim of Park Won-soon ‘Oh Se-hoon’s apology was a genuine apology from a responsible person.’Hankyoreh. https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/society/women/991841.html
41.
JangS., & HaS. (2022). The nature of party identification of Korean voters: Social identity vs. political interest. Korean Political Science Review, 56(2), 37–58.
42.
JangT.-S., & OhS. (2022, January24). Transition to sustainable growth in South Korea: Investment and trade under uncertainty. Millennial Asia, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/09763996211065139
43.
JeonJ., & ParkM. (2021, April6). Park emphasizes ‘The spirit of candlelight’ at Gwanghwamun Square… Oh says ‘The government should be judged’ at Shinchon (Trans.). Dong-A Ilbo. https://www.donga.com/news/Politics/article/all/20210406/106278569/1
44.
JoD. (2002, Fall). 386, the social movement generation of South Korea. Gyegan sasang (Sahoekwahakwon).
45.
JoH. G. (2000). The myth of moral politics and the politics of private morality. Economy and Society, 48, 107–131.
46.
JonesR. S. (2020, September14). Policies to stabilize housing prices in Korea (blog). Korea Economic Institute of America. https://keia.org/the-peninsula/policies-to-stabilize-housing-prices-in-korea/
47.
KangT. (2021, March13). President Moon’s remarks, ‘we are confident about housing policy, housing speculation cannot make money’, criticized. JoongAng Ilbo. https://news.joins.com/article/24010921
48.
KangW. (2008). How ideology divides generations: The 2002 and 2004 South Korean elections. Canadian Journal of Political Science [Revue Canadienne de Science Politique], 41(2), 461–480.
49.
KaurI., & SinghN. (2014). Financial integration and financial development in East Asia. Millennial Asia, 5(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0976399613518854
50.
KimC. (2020, August6). Lost Seoul: South Korean middle-class dreams spoiled by soaring house prices. Reuters (sec. Banks). https://www.reuters.com/article/us-southkorea-economy-middleclass-insigh-idUSKCN2520K8
51.
KimH. (2011). Korean democracy in transition: A rational blueprint for developing societies (Illustrated edition). University Press of Kentucky.
52.
KimH., ChoiJ. Y., & ChoJ. (2008). Changing cleavage structure in new democracies: An empirical analysis of political cleavages in Korea. Electoral Studies, 27(1), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2007.10.004
53.
KimH., & RohJ. (2019). The impact of candidates’ negative traits on vote choice in New Democracies: A test based on presidential elections in South Korea. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 54(2), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909618804273
KimK. R., KangJ. S., & YunS. (2012). Moral intuitions and political orientation: Similarities and differences between South Korea and the United States. Psychological Reports, 111(1), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.2466/17.09.21.PR0.111.4.173-185
56.
KimM. (2021, April4). National Election Commission bans a ‘Naeronambul’ banner… opposition party says ‘ridiculous, but thanks’. Chosun Biz. https://biz.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2021/04/04/2021040400918.html
57.
KimS. (2021, April8). How generational voting patterns have changed. Nocutnews. https://www.nocutnews.co.kr/news/5532100
58.
KimT. (2011). A study on moral failures of 386 politicians of the Roh Moo-hyun administration. Korean Political Science Review, 9, 219–238.
59.
KimT. (2020, April17). South Korean ruling party wins supermajority in legislative election. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2020/04/south-korean-ruling-party-wins-supermajority-in-legislative-election/
60.
KimballD. C., & PattersonS. C. (1997). Living up to expectations: Public attitudes toward congress. Journal of Politics, 59(3), 701–728.
61.
Korea Society Opinion Institute (KSOI). (2021). Korea society opinion institute survey. National Election Survey Deliberation Commission. https://www.nesdc.go.kr/files/result/202107/FILE_202104140138085420.pdf.htm
62.
Korean Social Science Data Center (KSDC). (2012). The 19th Korean National assembly election survey. https://www.ksdcdb.kr/data/dataSearchResView.do?surveyId=2078
63.
Korean Social Science Data Center (KSDC). (2016). The 20th Korean National assembly election survey. https://www.ksdcdb.kr/data/dataSearchResView.do?surveyId=2533
LeeB. J. (2000, April16). Korea’s ‘generation 386.’Newsweek. https://www.newsweek.com/koreas-generation-386-158097
66.
LeeH., & SingerM. M. (2022). The partisan origins of economic perceptions in a weak party system: Evidence from South Korea. Political Behavior, 44, 341–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09622-5
67.
LeeJ. H., & LeemK. H. (2004). The 2004 national assembly election: A critical election?Journal of Korean Politics, 13, 117–141.
68.
LeeJ. (2020). Ideological dimensions of party competition in Korea, 1992~2017. Journal of Contemporary Politics, 13(1), 5–39.
69.
LeeS. (2021, April8). Unique generational voting patterns… Voters in their twenties and those in their forties. Hankookilbo. https://www.hankookilbo.com/News/Read/A2021040818130003659
70.
LeeS. (2002, Fall). Generation gap and changes in ethical consciousness. Gyegan Sasang (Sahoekwahakwon).
71.
LodgeM., & HamillR. (1986). A partisan schema for political information processing. American Political Science Review, 80(2), 505–520.
72.
MahoneyJ. (2015). Process tracing and historical explanation. Security Studies, 24(2), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2015.1036610
73.
Newsweek. (2003, August3). Out with the old. https://www.newsweek.com/out-old-135475
74.
ParkJ. (2020, November22). In the April 15 general election, the conservative party was defeated despite a staggering 80% voting turnout among voters in their 60s. Hankook Ilbo. https://www.hankookilbo.com/News/Read/A2020112016550001682
ParkJ., & ChungE. (2021). Learning from past pandemic governance: Early response and Public-Private Partnerships in testing of COVID-19 in South Korea. World Development, 137, 105198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105198
77.
ParkM. (2008). Democracy and social change: A history of South Korean student movements, 1980-2000. Peter Lang.
78.
PetrocikJ. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 825–850.
79.
PetrocikJ. R., BenoitW. L., & HansenG. J. (2003). Issue ownership and presidential campaigning, 1952–2000. Political Science Quarterly, 118(4), 599–626.
80.
RahnW. (1993). The role of Partisan stereotypes in information-processing about political candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37(2), 472–496.
81.
RohG. W., & LeeH. W. (2019). Is the Korean party system unstable after democratization? Focusing on the effective number of parties and electoral volatility indexes. Korean Party Studies Review, 18(4), 5–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30992/KPSR.2019.12.18.4.5
82.
SellersP. (1998). Strategy and background in congressional campaigns. American Political Science Review, 92(1), 159–171.
83.
SeoY., & HollingsworthJ. (2020, July16). South Korea’s President says he’s a feminist: Three of his allies have been accused of sex crimes. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2020/07/15/asia/seoul-mayor-accuser-harassment-intl-hnk/index.html
84.
SerM. (2021, April1). Ruling party leaders apologize for rent-raising fiasco. Korea JoongAng Daily. https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/2021/04/01/national/politics/Park-Jumin-rent-control-Democratic-Party/20210401173900386.html
85.
ShawD. R. (1999). The effect of TV ads and candidate appearances on statewide presidential votes, 1988–1996. American Political Science Review, 93(2), 345–361.
86.
ShinH. (2021a, April9). ‘My romance, your adultery’: S. Koreans’ Sarcasm over hypocrisy follows moon into final year. Reuters (sec. Asia Pacific). https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/my-romance-your-adultery-skoreans-sarcasm-over-hypocrisy-follows-moon-into-final-2021-04-09/
87.
ShinM. (2021b). Seoul and busan mayor by-elections spell trouble for president moon. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2021/04/seoul-and-busan-mayor-by-elections-spell-trouble-for-president-moon/
88.
SimonA. F. (2002). The winning message: Candidate behavior, campaign discourse, and democracy. Cambridge University Press.
89.
SonJ. (2021, April2). From the leadership to newly-elected lawmaker born in 1991… the ruling party mobilizes order for all to apologize (Trans.). Seoul Shinmun. https://www.seoul.co.kr/news/newsView.php?id=20210402004048
90.
SongH. K. (2003). Politics, generation, and the making of new leadership in South Korea. Development and Society, 32(1), 103–123.
91.
SongY. (2021a, April6). An election with no winner (translated). Hankook Ilbo. https://www.hankookilbo.com/News/Read/A2021040616220004281
92.
SongY. (2021b, April12). People’s Power is also incompetent, but the ‘naeronambul’ Democratic Party is the worst (Trans.). Hankook Ilbo. https://www.hankookilbo.com/News/Read/A2021041213500001958
93.
van der BrugW. (2004). Issue ownership and party choice. Electoral Studies, 23(2), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(02)00061-6
94.
WalgraveS., TreschA., & LefevereJ. (2015). The conceptualisation and measurement of issue ownership. West European Politics, 38(4), 778–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1039381
95.
WalterA. S., & van der EijkC. (2019). Unintended consequences of negative campaigning: Backlash and second-preference boost effects in a multi-party context. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 21(3), 612–629. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148119842038
96.
WalterA. S., & RedlawskD. P. (2019). Voters’ partisan responses to politicians’ immoral behavior. Political Psychology, 40(5), 1075–1097. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12582
97.
WatermanR. W., Jenkins-SmithH. C., & SilvaC. L. (1999). The expectations gap thesis: Public attitudes toward an incumbent president. Journal of Politics, 61(4), 944–966.
98.
YoonJ. (2007). The metropolitan voting behavior in the 2007 presidential election: Regionalism, ideology and candidate factors. Korean Party Studies Review, 6(2), 65–95.
99.
YTN News. (2021, April2). (News Q) Early voting for re-election and by-election begins… (Trans.). https://www.ytn.co.kr/_ln/0101_202104021706047854
