This article analyses the importance of high-technology trade as a channel of economic growth to ease Malaysia out of the middle-income trap. This study also wonders upon the missing absorptive capabilities that validate the likelihoods of dismal gross domestic product (GDP) growth since the 1990s. Using the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach and fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS) estimator as robustness checks, this study identifies the determinants of high-technology trade and the appropriate absorptive capability in enhancing economic growth. The empirical results from quarterly data from 1990 to 2015 proved that foreign direct investment, financial development and infrastructure are vital to develop a successful high-technology trade. Another important finding is that it validates the presence of trade openness (as absorptive capability) in order to magnify the benefits of research and development (R&D). This explains why, despite spending on R&D, these spending do not project to economic growth.
AbramovitzM. (1986). Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind. Journal of Economic History, 46(2), 385–406.
2.
AghionP., BloomN., BlundellR., GriffithR. & HowittP. (2005). Competition and innovation: An inverted U-relationship. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2), 701–728.
3.
AhmedE. M. (2012). Are the FDI inflow spillover effect on Malaysia’s economic growth input driven?Economic Modelling, 29, 1498–1504.
4.
AitkenB., HansonG., & HarrisonA. (1997). Spillovers, foreign investment, and export behavior. Journal of International Economics, 43, 103–132.
5.
AlfaroL., ChandaA., Kalemli-OzcanS., & SayekS. (2004). FDI and economic growth: The role of local financial markets. Journal of International Economics, 64, 89–112.
6.
ArchibugiD., & PietrobelliC. (2003). The globalisation of technology and its implications for developing countries: Windows of opportunity or further burden?Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70, 861–883. 10.1016/S0040-1625(02)00409-2
7.
AthreyeS., & CantwellJ. (2007). Creating competition? Globalisation and the emergence of new technology producers. Research Policy, 36, 209–226.
8.
Azman-SainiW. N. W., BaharumshahA. Z., & LawS. H. (2010). Foreign direct investment, economic freedom and economic growth: International evidence. Economic Modeling, 27, 1079–1089.
9.
Azman-SainiW. N. W., FarhanM. Z. M., TeeC. -L., & TunY. -L. (2018). FDI inflows and R&D activity in developing countries. International Journal of Economics and Management, 12(S2), 509–521.
10.
BattenJ. A., & VoX. V. (2009). An analysis of the relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth. Applied Economics, 41, 1621–1641.
11.
BirkinshawJ., HoodN., & JonssonS. (1998). Building firm-specific advantages in multinational corporations: The role of subsidiary initiative. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 221–241.
12.
BrandtL., Van BiesebroeckJ., WangL. & ZhangY. (2017). WTO accession and performance of Chinese manufacturing firms. American Economic Review, 107(9), 2784–2820.
13.
BorenszteinE., De GregorioJ., & LeeJ. W. (1998). How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth. Journal of International Economics, 45, 115–135.
14.
CarolanT., MoraJ., & SinghN. (2013). Trade dynamics in the East Asian miracle: A time series analysis of US-East Asia commodity trade, 1962–1992. Millennial Asia, 4(1), 87–108.
15.
CantwellJ. (1999). The globalization of technology: What remains of the product life cycle model. In ArchibugiD., HowellsJ., & MichieJ. (Eds.), Innovative policy in a global economy (pp. 225–242). Cambridge University Press.
16.
CarpenterR. E., & PetersenB. C. (2002). Capital market imperfections, high-tech investment, and new equity financing. Economic Journal, 112(477), 54–72.
17.
CherifR., & HasanovF. (2015). The leap of the tiger: How Malaysia can escape the middle-income trap (IMF Working Paper, WP/15/131). International Monetary Fund.
18.
ChongP. W., & KhalifahN. A. (2019). Export expansion and production sharing in Malaysian manufacturing. International Journal of Economics and Management, 13(1), 37–49.
19.
ChorevS., & AndersonA. R. (2006). An aesthetic rural environment: The Tefen model of rural development. The Journal of Rural Enterprise and Management, 3(1), 56–68.
20.
ChuangW. B., & LinH. L. (2010). Interdependence between overseas and domestic R&D activities: Evidence from Taiwanese multinationals. Asian Economic Journal, 24, 305–332.
CohenW. M., & LevinthalD. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.
23.
DeakinsD., & PhilpottT. (1994). Comparative European practices in the finance of new technology entrepreneurs: United Kingdom, Germany and Holland. In OakeyR. P. (Ed.), New technology-based firms in the 1990s. Paul Chapman Publishing.
24.
DoucouliagosC., & UlubasogluM. A. (2006). Economic freedom and economic growth: Does specification make a difference?European Journal of Political Economy, 22(1), 68–81.
25.
ErikssonK., & JohansonJ. (1997). Experiential knowledge and cost in the internalisation process. Journal of International Business Studies, 28, 337–360.
26.
FagerbergJ., & GodinhoM. M. (2005). Innovation and catching-up. In FagerbergJ., MoweryD., & NelsonR. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press.
27.
FalkM. (2007). R&D spending in the high-tech sector and economic growth. Research in Economics, 61(3), 140–147.
28.
FalkowskiK. (2018). Competitiveness of the Baltic states in international high-technology goods trade. Comparative Economic Research, 21(1), 25–43.
29.
FotrosM. H., & AhmadN. (2017). Impact of import and export of high technology industries on economic growth of Iran. Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics, 14(2), 1–24.
30.
GamalA. A. M., RambeliN., JalilN. A., & ViswanathanK. K. (2019). A modified currency demand function and the Malaysian shadow economy: Evidence from ARDL bounds testing approach. Economic Analysis and Policy, 64, 266–281.
31.
GrossmanG., & HelpmanE. (1991). Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press.
32.
GuimonJ., ChaminadeC., MaggiC., & Salazar-ElenaJ. C. (2018). Policies to attract R&D-related FDI in small emerging countries: Aligning incentives with local linkages and absorptive capacities in Chile. Journal of International Management, 24, 165–178.
33.
GuoF., BoQ., TongX., & ZhangX. (2020). A paradoxical view of speed and quality on operational outcome: An empirical investigation of innovation in high-tech small and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Production Economics, 229, 107780.
34.
HaddadM., & HarrisonA. (1993). Are there positive spillovers from direct foreign investment? Evidence from panel data for Morocco. Journal of Development Economics, 42, 51–74.
35.
de HannJ., & SiermannC. L. J. (1998). Further evidence on the relationship between economic freedom and economic growth. Public Choice, 95, 363–380.
36.
HarbiS., AmamouM., & AndersonA. R. (2009). Establishing high-tech industry: The Tunisian ICT experience. Technovation, 29, 465–480.
37.
HarrisR., & LiQ. C. (2009). Exporting, R&D, and absorptive capacity in UK establishments. Oxford Economic Papers, 61, 74–103.
38.
Heritage Foundation. (2004). Index of economic freedom. The Heritage Foundation and Dow Jones and Company.
39.
HermesN., & LensinkR. (2003). Foreign direct investment, financial development and economic growth. Journal of Development Studies, 40, 142–163.
40.
HillR. C., GriffithsW. E., & LimG. C. (2012). Principles of econometrics. John Wiley.
41.
HoffmanK., ParejoM., BessantJ., & PerrenL. (1998). Small firms, R&D, technology and innovation in the UK: A literature review. Technovation, 18(1), 39–55.
42.
IslamS. (1996). Economic freedom, per capita income and economic growth. Applied Economics Letter, 3(9), 595–597.
43.
IsmailN. W. (2013). Innovation and high-tech trade in Asian countries. Paper presented at the International Conference on Recent Developments in Asian Trade Policy and Integration. https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/gep/documents/conferences/2013/malaysia-conference/normaz-wana-ismail.pdf
44.
JosephK. J. (2013). Has trade been an engine of inclusive growth? India’s experience under globalization. Millennial Asia, 4(2), 135–157.
45.
KayalvizhiP. N., & ThenmozhiM. (2018). Does quality of innovation, culture and governance drive FDI? Evidence from emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review, 34, 175–191.
46.
KeebleD., & WilkinsonF. (2000). High-technology clusters, networking and collective learning in Europe. Routledge.
47.
KimL. (1980). Stages of development of industrial technology in a developing country: A model. Research Policy, 9, 254–277.
48.
KrollH., & LiefnerL. (2008). Spin-off enterprises as a means of technology commercialisation in a transforming economy, evidence from three universities in China. Technovation, 28, 298–313.
49.
KumarN., & SiddharthanN. S. (1997). Technology, market structure and institutions: Issues and policies for developing countries. United Nations University.
50.
ManiS. (2000). Export of high technology products from developing countries: Is it real or a statistical artifact. In ManiS., & RomijnP. (Eds.), Innovation, learning, and technological dynamism of developing countries (pp. 12–45). United Nations University Press.
51.
MartinA., & BellM. (2006). Technology spillovers from foreign direct investment (FDI): An exploration of the active role of MNC subsidiaries in the case of Argentina in the 1990s. Journal of Development Studies, 42, 678–697.
52.
MasonC., & HarrisonR. (2004). Does investing in technology-based firms involve higher risk? An explanatory study of the performance of technology and non-technology investments by business angels. Venture Capital, 6(4), 313–332.
53.
MoweryD., & OxleyJ. (1995). Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: The role of national innovation systems. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 67–93.
54.
PajooyanJ., & FaghihnasiriM. (2009). The effect of competitively on economic growth towards the endogenous growth pattern (in Persian). Economic Research of Iran, 13(28), 97–132.
55.
PatelP., & PavittK. (1998). National systems of innovation under strain: The internalization of corporate R&D (Electronic Working Paper Series). Science Policy Research Unit.
56.
PesaranM. H., & PesaranB. (1997). Working with Microfit 4.0: Interactive econometric analysis. Oxford University Press.
57.
PesaranM. H., ShinY., & SmithR. J. (2001). Bound testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.
58.
PhilipsP. C. B., & HansenB. E. (1990). Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. The Review of Economic Studies, 57(1), 99–125.
59.
PorterM. (1985). Competitive advantage, creating and sustaining superior performance. The Free Press.
60.
PorterM. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press.
61.
PrakashJ. V., & NauriyalD. K. (2021). Integration and interdependence among equity markets in South Asia: Measuring through ARDL bounds approach. Millennial Asia, 12(2), 229–251.
62.
RomijnH., & AlbaladejoM. (2002). Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England. Research Policy, 31, 1053–1067.
63.
RongS., LiuK., HuangS., & ZhangQ. (2020). FDI, labor market flexibility and employment in China. China Economic Review, 61, 101449.
64.
RootF. (1992). International trade and investment. South-Western.
65.
RoukanasS., & KarakostasE. (2019). Is Japan a pioneer in high technology exports?The Romanian Economic Journal, 22(73), 2–18.
66.
SchneiderP. H. (2005). International trade, economic growth and intellectual property rights: A panel data study of developed and developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 78, 529–547.
67.
SchumpeterJ. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press.
68.
ScullyG. W., & SlottjeD. J. (1991). Ranking economic liberty across countries. Public Choice, 69, 121–152.
69.
SeyoumB. (2004). The role of factor conditions in high-technology exports: An empirical examination. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 15, 145–162.
70.
ShinW., OhS., & RhoS. (2019). Innovation and exports of Korean firms: How do they differ by size and industry?Millennial Asia, 10(2). 10.1177/0976399619879875
71.
SqualliJ., & WilsonK. (2011). A new measure of trade openness. The World Economy, 34(10), 1745–1770.
72.
StoianA., & IorgulescuF. (2020). Fiscal policy and stock market efficiency: An ARDL bounds testing approach. Economic Modeling. 10.1177/0976399619879875
73.
SultanaN., & TurkinaE. (2020). Foreign direct investment, technological advancement, and absorptive capacity: A network analysis. International Business Review, 29, 101668.
74.
TangY., & ZhangK. H. (2016). Absorptive capacity and benefits from FDI: Evidence form Chinese manufactured exports. International Review of Economics and Finance, 42, 423–429.
75.
TeixeiraA. A. C., & FortunaN. (2010). Human capital, R&D, trade, and long-run productivity. Testing the technological absorption hypothesis for the Portuguese economy, 1960–2001. Research Policy, 39, 335–350.
76.
TingvallP., & PohdahlA. (2006). Is there really an inverted U-shaped relation between competition and R&D?Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(2), 101–118.
77.
TrischlerJ., JohnsonM., & KristenssonP. (2020). A service ecosystem perspective on the diffusion of sustainability-oriented user innovations. Journal of Business Research. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.011
78.
VargoS. L., AkakaM. A., & WielandH. (2020). Rethinking the process of diffusion in innovation: A service-ecosystems and institutional perspective. Journal of Business Research. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.038
79.
XuB. (2000). Multinational enterprises, technology diffusion, and host country productivity growth. Journal of Development Economics, 62, 477–493.
80.
XuB., & WangJ. (1999). Capital goods trade and R&D spillovers in the OECD. Canadian Journal of Economics, 32(5), 1258–1274.
81.
ZhuL., & JeonB. (2007). International R&D spillovers: Trade, FDI, and information technology as spillover channels. Review of International Economics, 15(5), 955–976.
